digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 12046] New: Rebindable supports arrays
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (20/20) Jan 31 2014 https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (8/8) Jan 31 2014 https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (11/11) Feb 03 2014 https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (7/8) Feb 03 2014 https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (11/11) Feb 15 2014 https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/12) Feb 15 2014 https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (9/9) Feb 15 2014 https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/12) Feb 15 2014 https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (11/11) Feb 15 2014 https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/18) Feb 15 2014 https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046 Summary: Rebindable supports arrays Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: tools AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: monarchdodra gmail.com Which makes no sense (IMO) for types other than classes and interfaces. But for types such as dynamic arrays, where you can strip head-qualifiers, there's no point in having Rebindable work with it. It *might* make sense with associative arrays though... Not sure. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 31 2014
d-bugmail puremagic.com https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046 To add to that, the documentation clearly states: However, Rebindable!(T) does not compile if T is a non-class type. The fact it ever worked at all with dynamic arrays may have been an error. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 31 2014
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046 Vladimir Panteleev <thecybershadow gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thecybershadow gmail.com Component|tools |Phobos 00:07:15 EET --- Why was the component set to "tools"? -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 03 2014
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046Why was the component set to "tools"?I accidentally the wrong in the drop down menu. Sorry :/ -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 03 2014
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046 Peter Alexander <peter.alexander.au gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter.alexander.au gmail.co | |m 11:53:05 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1943 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 15 2014
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046 Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/f8aa638c5a78401006784b2b9f7ad456bca1b3dc Fix Issue 12046 - Disallow Rebindable!(T[N]) https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/ae4678e2bb6baa61d5529d447ce4b5eca37ad7b4 Fix Issue 12046 - Disallow Rebindable!(T[N]) -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 15 2014
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046 Peter Alexander <peter.alexander.au gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 15 2014
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046 monarchdodra gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | 1943 fixed the *static* array issue (which was a bug, plain and simple). It still supports dynamic arrays, which I think it shouldn't. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 15 2014
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046 15:34:38 PST --- Sorry for closing, should have read the bug more carefully. However, I'm not sure what you expect to happen here. Rebindable has supported arrays for several years now. We can't just remove it. Removing it would making Rebindable a little more simple, and allows us to remove a few lines of code, but are there any other benefits? Is it worth potentially breaking someone's code, or introducing a slow deprecation process? -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 15 2014
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046However, I'm not sure what you expect to happen here. Rebindable has supported arrays for several years now. We can't just remove it. Removing it would making Rebindable a little more simple, and allows us to remove a few lines of code, but are there any other benefits? Is it worth potentially breaking someone's code, or introducing a slow deprecation process?I don't know what I expect to happen, nor what the best solution is, but there *is* something odd here, and that's why I filed the issue. As I said, it goes against what documentation says. I also find it *very* inconsistent that arrays are accepted, but not pointers nor AA's. Especially pointers, which are the closest things to classes. *I*'d introduce a "slow" deprecation process. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 15 2014