digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 11833] New: std.process: ddoc warnings
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (28/28) Dec 27 2013 https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11833
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (16/16) Feb 11 2014 https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11833
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11833 Summary: std.process: ddoc warnings Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: andrei erdani.com PST --- std/process.d(1591): Warning: Ddoc: function declaration has no parameter 'program' std/process.d(1591): Warning: Ddoc: function declaration has no parameter 'command' std/process.d(1591): Warning: Ddoc: parameter count mismatch std/process.d(1925): Warning: Ddoc: function declaration has no parameter 'program' std/process.d(1925): Warning: Ddoc: function declaration has no parameter 'command' std/process.d(1925): Warning: Ddoc: parameter count mismatch produced by running make -f posix.mak html -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Dec 27 2013
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11833 Vladimir Panteleev <thecybershadow gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thecybershadow gmail.com 03:00:23 EET --- These are caused by, arguably, a compiler deficiency: the compiler does not consider all of a function's overloads, documented together with "/// ditto", when generating these warnings. So, it is complaining about arguments that do not exist in the first overload (the one immediately below the DDoc in question), but do exist in its ditto-annotated overloads. This can probably be closed as a duplicate of whichever issue documents said compiler deficiency. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 11 2014