digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 11572] New: eager apply for ranges
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (26/26) Nov 21 2013 https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11572
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (16/25) Nov 21 2013 https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11572
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/31) Nov 21 2013 https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11572
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (7/9) Nov 21 2013 https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11572
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Mar 09 2014 https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11572
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11572 Summary: eager apply for ranges Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Phobos AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: code dawg.eu The use-case foreach (c; "foobar".retro()) writeln(c); "foobar".retro.apply!writeln(); This is not a functional component because it's mostly useful for void functions with side effect. Currently one needs to mix foreach and UFCS. Not sure about the name, maybe sink or apply. Or we could modify std.algorithm.reduce to allow void functions. NB: The function is not supposed to produce a result (we have -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Nov 21 2013
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11572 bearophile_hugs eml.cc changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bearophile_hugs eml.ccThe use-case foreach (c; "foobar".retro()) writeln(c); "foobar".retro.apply!writeln();This is a common need, perhaps such request is already in Bugzilla.Not sure about the name, maybe sink or apply."sink" is probably better left for output ranges, etc. "apply" function usually has another meaning: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apply So I suggest names like "forEach", that underlines its imperative nature.Or we could modify std.algorithm.reduce to allow void functions.Reduce has a different meaning. Here you are not "reducing".Currently one needs to mix foreach and UFCS.-- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Nov 21 2013
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11572 Dmitry Olshansky <dmitry.olsh gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dmitry.olsh gmail.com 13:37:11 PST ---Simply each is enough and has precedents in other languages like Groovy and Ruby. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------The use-case foreach (c; "foobar".retro()) writeln(c); "foobar".retro.apply!writeln();This is a common need, perhaps such request is already in Bugzilla.Not sure about the name, maybe sink or apply."sink" is probably better left for output ranges, etc. "apply" function usually has another meaning: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apply So I suggest names like "forEach", that underlines its imperative nature.
Nov 21 2013
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11572Simply each is enough and has precedents in other languages like Groovy and Ruby.Yep, 'each' is good. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Nov 21 2013
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11572 Peter Alexander <peter.alexander.au gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter.alexander.au gmail.co | |m Severity|normal |enhancement -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 09 2014