digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 10556] New: mixin template fails overload resolution
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (51/51) Jul 06 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10556
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (13/13) Jul 06 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10556
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10556
Summary: mixin template fails overload resolution
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
ReportedBy: monarchdodra gmail.com
--------mixin template fooImpl(T)
{
static void foo(T t)
{}
}
struct S{}
mixin fooImpl!S;
mixin fooImpl!int;
mixin fooImpl!long;
void main()
{
S s;
int a;
foo(s);
foo(a); //17
}
--------
hello.d
17
Error: hello.fooImpl!(int).foo at hello.d:3 conflicts with
hello.fooImpl!(long).foo at hello.d:3
--------
Here, I'm using mixin template fooImpl to create a finite set of non-template
functions. In particular, I'm generating the functions "foo(int)" and
"foo(long)".
Yet, when making the call to "foo" with an int, the compiler complains of
finding multiple matches, failing to "see" that there is an exact match.
Apparently, I think the compiler sees "foo" as template functions
"fooImpl!long.foo(long)", so they all equally match. I think this is wrong
behavior.
The specs state that "If two different mixins are put in the same scope, and
each define a declaration with the same name, there is an ambiguity error when
the declaration is referenced", however this is clearly not the case, since
"foo(s)" is correctly resolved. foo(int) and foo(long) should also correctly
resolve just as well.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 06 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10556
monarchdodra gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |http://d.puremagic.com/issu
| |es/show_bug.cgi?id=8074
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8074
8074 is related, although it deals with "strictly non-ambiguous overloads". In
this example, there are multiple matches, but one is "exact".
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 06 2013








d-bugmail puremagic.com