digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 10556] New: mixin template fails overload resolution
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (51/51) Jul 06 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10556
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (13/13) Jul 06 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10556
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10556 Summary: mixin template fails overload resolution Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: monarchdodra gmail.com --------mixin template fooImpl(T) { static void foo(T t) {} } struct S{} mixin fooImpl!S; mixin fooImpl!int; mixin fooImpl!long; void main() { S s; int a; foo(s); foo(a); //17 } -------- hello.d 17 Error: hello.fooImpl!(int).foo at hello.d:3 conflicts with hello.fooImpl!(long).foo at hello.d:3 -------- Here, I'm using mixin template fooImpl to create a finite set of non-template functions. In particular, I'm generating the functions "foo(int)" and "foo(long)". Yet, when making the call to "foo" with an int, the compiler complains of finding multiple matches, failing to "see" that there is an exact match. Apparently, I think the compiler sees "foo" as template functions "fooImpl!long.foo(long)", so they all equally match. I think this is wrong behavior. The specs state that "If two different mixins are put in the same scope, and each define a declaration with the same name, there is an ambiguity error when the declaration is referenced", however this is clearly not the case, since "foo(s)" is correctly resolved. foo(int) and foo(long) should also correctly resolve just as well. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 06 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10556 monarchdodra gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |http://d.puremagic.com/issu | |es/show_bug.cgi?id=8074 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8074 8074 is related, although it deals with "strictly non-ambiguous overloads". In this example, there are multiple matches, but one is "exact". -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 06 2013