www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - Bugzilla still down

reply Bill Baxter <wbaxter gmail.com> writes:
The thing is still down.  Anyone have any information?  (Who runs 
"puremagic" anyway?)

Is this some clever plot on Walter's part to prevent any new bugs from 
appearing in the home stretch to 1.0?
"See! look! D must be ready for 1.0 because there were NO NEW BUGS filed 
the ENTIRE TWO WEEKS prior to release!"  :-)

--bb
Dec 16 2006
next sibling parent reply Bill Baxter <wbaxter gmail.com> writes:
Bill Baxter wrote:
 The thing is still down.  Anyone have any information?  (Who runs 
 "puremagic" anyway?)
 
 Is this some clever plot on Walter's part to prevent any new bugs from 
 appearing in the home stretch to 1.0?
 "See! look! D must be ready for 1.0 because there were NO NEW BUGS filed 
 the ENTIRE TWO WEEKS prior to release!"  :-)
 
 --bb
Or maybe it's Brad Roberts' diabolical plan. :-) Brad seems to be the one behind puremagic.com. What's the word, Brad? --bb
Dec 16 2006
next sibling parent Lars Ivar Igesund <larsivar igesund.net> writes:
Bill Baxter wrote:

 Bill Baxter wrote:
 The thing is still down.  Anyone have any information?  (Who runs
 "puremagic" anyway?)
 
 Is this some clever plot on Walter's part to prevent any new bugs from
 appearing in the home stretch to 1.0?
 "See! look! D must be ready for 1.0 because there were NO NEW BUGS filed
 the ENTIRE TWO WEEKS prior to release!"  :-)
 
 --bb
Or maybe it's Brad Roberts' diabolical plan. :-) Brad seems to be the one behind puremagic.com. What's the word, Brad? --bb
Haven't seen Brad on IRC for a couple of days either (I think). -- Lars Ivar Igesund blog at http://larsivi.net DSource & #D: larsivi
Dec 16 2006
prev sibling parent reply "Andrei Alexandrescu (See Website for Email)" <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> writes:
Bill Baxter wrote:
 Bill Baxter wrote:
 The thing is still down.  Anyone have any information?  (Who runs 
 "puremagic" anyway?)

 Is this some clever plot on Walter's part to prevent any new bugs from 
 appearing in the home stretch to 1.0?
 "See! look! D must be ready for 1.0 because there were NO NEW BUGS 
 filed the ENTIRE TWO WEEKS prior to release!"  :-)

 --bb
Or maybe it's Brad Roberts' diabolical plan. :-) Brad seems to be the one behind puremagic.com. What's the word, Brad?
Brad AND Walter have no electricity since the storm of Friday night. Consequently, Brad's server is down, and both of them have no access to the Net. Andrei
Dec 16 2006
parent reply Bill Baxter <wbaxter gmail.com> writes:
Andrei Alexandrescu (See Website for Email) wrote:
 Bill Baxter wrote:
 
 Bill Baxter wrote:

 The thing is still down.  Anyone have any information?  (Who runs 
 "puremagic" anyway?)

 Is this some clever plot on Walter's part to prevent any new bugs 
 from appearing in the home stretch to 1.0?
 "See! look! D must be ready for 1.0 because there were NO NEW BUGS 
 filed the ENTIRE TWO WEEKS prior to release!"  :-)

 --bb
Or maybe it's Brad Roberts' diabolical plan. :-) Brad seems to be the one behind puremagic.com. What's the word, Brad?
Brad AND Walter have no electricity since the storm of Friday night. Consequently, Brad's server is down, and both of them have no access to the Net. Andrei
Zoiks! :-o Thanks for the info. --bb
Dec 16 2006
parent reply Brad Roberts <braddr puremagic.com> writes:
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006, Bill Baxter wrote:

 Andrei Alexandrescu (See Website for Email) wrote:
 Bill Baxter wrote:
 
 Bill Baxter wrote:
 
 The thing is still down.  Anyone have any information?  (Who runs
 "puremagic" anyway?)
 
 Is this some clever plot on Walter's part to prevent any new bugs from
 appearing in the home stretch to 1.0?
 "See! look! D must be ready for 1.0 because there were NO NEW BUGS filed
 the ENTIRE TWO WEEKS prior to release!"  :-)
 
 --bb
Or maybe it's Brad Roberts' diabolical plan. :-) Brad seems to be the one behind puremagic.com. What's the word, Brad?
Brad AND Walter have no electricity since the storm of Friday night. Consequently, Brad's server is down, and both of them have no access to the Net. Andrei
Zoiks! :-o Thanks for the info. --bb
Thanks for letting people know Andrei. I'm still without power, as is Walter more than likely. This was one doosy of a storm and has most of the greater seattle area turned into something of a third world country (ok, maybe second..). They're estimating another week before power is fully restored to everyone. I've moved the box hosting d.puremagic.com to a datacenter that's got power and is warmer (not something you typicaly say about a datacenter) than my house. Once power is restored to my house there will be another down time (measured in hours not days) to move it back. I'll give some advanced notice for that outage. Later, Brad
Dec 16 2006
parent =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jari-Matti_M=E4kel=E4?= <jmjmak utu.fi.invalid> writes:
Brad Roberts wrote:
 On Sun, 17 Dec 2006, Bill Baxter wrote:
 Andrei Alexandrescu (See Website for Email) wrote:
 Brad AND Walter have no electricity since the storm of Friday night.
 Consequently, Brad's server is down, and both of them have no access to the
 Net.
 I'm still without power, as is Walter more than likely.  This was one 
 doosy of a storm and has most of the greater seattle area turned into 
 something of a third world country (ok, maybe second..).  They're 
 estimating another week before power is fully restored to everyone.
Hopefully this does not push a lot of pressure on Walter to stay on the release schedule. He has worked very hard lately and now he might be without electricity. :(
Dec 16 2006
prev sibling parent Stewart Gordon <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> writes:
Bill Baxter wrote:
 The thing is still down.  Anyone have any information?  (Who runs 
 "puremagic" anyway?)
See for yourself: http://domains.dan.info/cgi-bin/gtwhois/proxy.cgi?query=puremagic.com&targetnic=auto
 Is this some clever plot on Walter's part to prevent any new bugs from 
 appearing in the home stretch to 1.0?
 "See! look! D must be ready for 1.0 because there were NO NEW BUGS filed 
 the ENTIRE TWO WEEKS prior to release!"  :-)
If Walter were behind the Bugzilla installation, I doubt it would have that peculiar domain name. Stewart.
Dec 16 2006