digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 282] New: Bizarre circular import nested name invisibility issue
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (53/53) Aug 10 2006 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282
- Derek Parnell (12/16) Aug 10 2006 It depends on the order that you compile the modules.
- Jarrett Billingsley (8/13) Aug 11 2006 Okay, here's something frustrating. That works, and I'm very happy abou...
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (9/9) Aug 11 2006 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (5/7) Aug 11 2006 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Sep 18 2009 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Dec 29 2009 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Dec 29 2009 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (7/8) Dec 29 2009 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (11/11) Dec 31 2009 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282
Summary: Bizarre circular import nested name invisibility issue
Product: D
Version: 0.163
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com
ReportedBy: jarrett.billingsley gmail.com
I really don't know what else to call this, and it's a bit tedious to get to
happen. So here's the general idea:
------ [modules/test1.d] --------
module modules.test1;
import modules.test2;
struct A
{
enum B
{
One,
Two
}
}
void bar()
{
foo();
}
--------- [modules/test2.d] ---------
module modules.test2;
import modules.test1;
A.B foobar; // error, no property B for type A?!
void foo()
{
int x;
if(x == A.B.One) // but this is OK
x = 1;
}
---------------------------------
Some interesting facts:
- This only seems to happen if the modules are in a package. If they're two
top-level modules, it works fine.
- Notice I can't use A.B as a type, but I can in fact access A.B's members.
- Using static imports/aliased imports does not help.
I don't know how to get it to not work the way it does in MiniD - that is, I
can't even use A.B in the same module that A.B is defined!
This is, for me, something of a showstopper.. I'll probably be using 0.162 for
a bit, which is sad, considering how cool the 0.163 features are! I don't know
if I should change the priority of this bug, but this is something that can't
be worked around easily, so I'd put it pretty high up there.
--
Aug 10 2006
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 03:43:18 +0000 (UTC), d-bugmail puremagic.com wrote:This is, for me, something of a showstopper.. I'll probably be using 0.162 for a bit, which is sad, considering how cool the 0.163 features are! I don't know if I should change the priority of this bug, but this is something that can't be worked around easily, so I'd put it pretty high up there.It depends on the order that you compile the modules. This works... dmd -c modules\test2 modules\test1 This doesn't ... dmd -c modules\test1 modules\test2 -- Derek (skype: derek.j.parnell) Melbourne, Australia "Down with mediocrity!" 11/08/2006 3:02:17 PM
Aug 10 2006
"Jarrett Billingsley" <kb3ctd2 yahoo.com> "Derek Parnell" <derek nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message news:17moo13ephs7r.19lhtzygw8iie$.dlg 40tude.net...It depends on the order that you compile the modules. This works... dmd -c modules\test2 modules\test1 This doesn't ... dmd -c modules\test1 modules\test2Okay, here's something frustrating. That works, and I'm very happy about that. But if you include other modules on the commandline before the conflicting modules, such as: dmd -c modules\test3 modules\test2 modules\test1 It no longer works. But put that other module at the end, and it does. Tedious, but hopefully Walter will fix this. Very soon.
Aug 11 2006
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282
dawid.ciezarkiewicz gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dawid.ciezarkiewicz gmail.co
| |m
--
Aug 11 2006
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=455) ensure semantic run when searching struct for members When searching members of a class that is not yet semantically analyzed, the analysis is run on it. This is not done for structs or unions, which is probably an omission. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Sep 18 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282
Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bugzilla digitalmars.com
03:07:49 PST ---
Changeset 318
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Dec 29 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282
Leandro Lucarella <llucax gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |llucax gmail.com
PST ---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Dec 29 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282 PST ---http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282Damn! http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/318 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Dec 29 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282
Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
11:09:22 PST ---
Fixed dmd 1.054 and 2.038
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Dec 31 2009