digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 220] New: ICE with template and mangleof
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (26/26) Jun 23 2006 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=220
- Thomas Kuehne (18/32) Jun 29 2006 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (11/11) Aug 24 2006 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=220
- Thomas Kuehne (13/17) Aug 24 2006 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
- Oskar Linde (5/18) Aug 24 2006 It used to do so. I reported this as issue 243. Not sure anyone
- Brad Roberts (5/27) Aug 24 2006 It does, but only if the message comes from someone with a registered
- Thomas Kuehne (12/29) Aug 24 2006 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
- Brad Roberts (6/43) Aug 24 2006 (subject changed to stop polluting bugzilla with this thread)
- Thomas Kuehne (12/22) Aug 25 2006 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
- Brad Roberts (10/40) Aug 25 2006 Ok.. that'd be because that message came in while the regexp for
- Thomas Kuehne (10/17) Aug 26 2006 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
- Bruno Medeiros (8/37) Aug 25 2006 Hum, I didn't know bugzilla did that. For reference, is it possible for
- Oskar Linde (4/39) Aug 25 2006 As Brad said, if you make sure the subject doesn't match the issue or
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=220 Summary: ICE with template and mangleof Product: D Version: 0.160 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P4 Component: DMD AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com ReportedBy: clugdbug yahoo.com.au Assertion failure: 'deco' on line 536 in file 'mtype.c' Tested with DMD-Windows 0.160 and 0.161. Very easy workaround (just add parentheses). --- template echidna(char[] str) { const int echidna = 1; } // Must be 'typedef', can be any function or delegate typedef int function (int) platypus; // If you uncomment this next line, _both_ asserts will compile! //static assert( echidna!((platypus).mangleof) == 1); static assert( echidna!(platypus.mangleof) == 1); --
Jun 23 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 d-bugmail puremagic.com schrieb am 2006-06-23:http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=220Assertion failure: 'deco' on line 536 in file 'mtype.c' Tested with DMD-Windows 0.160 and 0.161. Very easy workaround (just add parentheses). --- template echidna(char[] str) { const int echidna = 1; } // Must be 'typedef', can be any function or delegate typedef int function (int) platypus; // If you uncomment this next line, _both_ asserts will compile! //static assert( echidna!((platypus).mangleof) == 1); static assert( echidna!(platypus.mangleof) == 1);Added to DStress as http://dstress.kuehne.cn/compile/m/mangelof_16_A.d http://dstress.kuehne.cn/compile/m/mangelof_16_B.d http://dstress.kuehne.cn/compile/m/mangelof_16_C.d http://dstress.kuehne.cn/compile/m/mangelof_16_D.d http://dstress.kuehne.cn/compile/m/mangelof_16_E.d http://dstress.kuehne.cn/compile/m/mangelof_16_F.d http://dstress.kuehne.cn/compile/m/mangelof_16_G.d http://dstress.kuehne.cn/compile/m/mangelof_16_H.d Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFEo7O23w+/yD4P9tIRAjdTAKCx27qp05lOFSHnGXO6bYNdonC8egCgkkn1 ckzfVdtkFU0u03wI6ojkaXE= =XT2l -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Jun 29 2006
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=220 clugdbug yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED This appears to have been sliently fixed - at least in works in DMD 0.165 Windows. Probably should be in DStress, though, in case it reappears. --
Aug 24 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 d-bugmail puremagic.com schrieb am 2006-08-24:http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=220 This appears to have been sliently fixed - at least in works in DMD 0.165 Windows. Probably should be in DStress, though, in case it reappears.Strange, I thougth bugzilla integrated messages posted in the news group? news:0nocn3-d58.ln1 birke.kuehne.cn http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-bugs/2006-June/001392.html Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFE7coaLK5blCcjpWoRArfFAKCjAw6eAAbQhMXjhBmQQHWfapLwtgCaAowx Uw4vIC5eEMEXi4KDHk+wcP4= =k/4G -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Aug 24 2006
Thomas Kuehne wrote:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 d-bugmail puremagic.com schrieb am 2006-08-24:It used to do so. I reported this as issue 243. Not sure anyone responsible noticed though. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=243 /Oskarhttp://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=220 This appears to have been sliently fixed - at least in works in DMD 0.165 Windows. Probably should be in DStress, though, in case it reappears.Strange, I thougth bugzilla integrated messages posted in the news group?
Aug 24 2006
Oskar Linde wrote:Thomas Kuehne wrote:It does, but only if the message comes from someone with a registered email address. If the address doesn't exist, the msg isn't captured. Later, Brad-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 d-bugmail puremagic.com schrieb am 2006-08-24:It used to do so. I reported this as issue 243. Not sure anyone responsible noticed though. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=243 /Oskarhttp://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=220 This appears to have been sliently fixed - at least in works in DMD 0.165 Windows. Probably should be in DStress, though, in case it reappears.Strange, I thougth bugzilla integrated messages posted in the news group?
Aug 24 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brad Roberts schrieb am 2006-08-24:Oskar Linde wrote:Thomas Kuehne wrote:Strange, I thougth bugzilla integrated messages posted in the news group?It used to do so. I reported this as issue 243. Not sure anyone responsible noticed though. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=243It does, but only if the message comes from someone with a registered email address. If the address doesn't exist, the msg isn't captured.Header extract from the message under investigation:Message-ID: <0nocn3-d58.ln1 birke.kuehne.cn> From: Thomas Kuehne <thomas-dloop kuehne.cn> Newsgroups: digitalmars.D.bugs Subject: Re: [Issue 220] New: ICE with template and mangleof References: <bug-220-3 http.d.puremagic.com/issues/>When I file a new bug report, buzilla uses the same address as above for the "ReportedBy" field. Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFE7hxSLK5blCcjpWoRAjQ6AJ4q2EwOFLMGKhtNgdhWFHSXA04QgwCffcFv /xddd+Ji6PeX8Vngz6LM9O8= =s4K4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Aug 24 2006
Thomas Kuehne wrote:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brad Roberts schrieb am 2006-08-24:(subject changed to stop polluting bugzilla with this thread) It's definitely working. What am I missing? Later, BradOskar Linde wrote:Thomas Kuehne wrote:Strange, I thougth bugzilla integrated messages posted in the news group?It used to do so. I reported this as issue 243. Not sure anyone responsible noticed though. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=243It does, but only if the message comes from someone with a registered email address. If the address doesn't exist, the msg isn't captured.Header extract from the message under investigation:Message-ID: <0nocn3-d58.ln1 birke.kuehne.cn> From: Thomas Kuehne <thomas-dloop kuehne.cn> Newsgroups: digitalmars.D.bugs Subject: Re: [Issue 220] New: ICE with template and mangleof References: <bug-220-3 http.d.puremagic.com/issues/>When I file a new bug report, buzilla uses the same address as above for the "ReportedBy" field. Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFE7hxSLK5blCcjpWoRAjQ6AJ4q2EwOFLMGKhtNgdhWFHSXA04QgwCffcFv /xddd+Ji6PeX8Vngz6LM9O8= =s4K4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Aug 24 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brad Roberts schrieb am 2006-08-25:Thomas Kuehne wrote:Header extract from the message under investigation:Message-ID: <0nocn3-d58.ln1 birke.kuehne.cn> From: Thomas Kuehne <thomas-dloop kuehne.cn> Newsgroups: digitalmars.D.bugs Subject: Re: [Issue 220] New: ICE with template and mangleof References: <bug-220-3 http.d.puremagic.com/issues/>It's definitely working. What am I missing?I don't see the text of 0nocn3-d58.ln1 birke.kuehne.cn (see above) in bugzilla. A copy of the message was received by puremagic.com: http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-bugs/2006-June/001392.html Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFE7rmfLK5blCcjpWoRAheiAJ9Tn1Wca5nxfKdT/QBuaKVBCGmeiACfZyvR TE1XiMzE4fRKyL3snuWdwko= =5qIH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Aug 25 2006
Thomas Kuehne wrote:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brad Roberts schrieb am 2006-08-25:Ok.. that'd be because that message came in while the regexp for matching subjects was still looking only at \[Bug \d+\] instead of \[(Bug|Issue) \d+\]. The regexp was fixed on July 12th and had been broken since approx June 11th. I did not attempt to re-capture messages from that span of time. Yours are arguably of high enough value to want to try to do that, or at least do that for the dstress additions. I'll add that to my todo list for this weekend. Later, BradThomas Kuehne wrote:Header extract from the message under investigation:Message-ID: <0nocn3-d58.ln1 birke.kuehne.cn> From: Thomas Kuehne <thomas-dloop kuehne.cn> Newsgroups: digitalmars.D.bugs Subject: Re: [Issue 220] New: ICE with template and mangleof References: <bug-220-3 http.d.puremagic.com/issues/>It's definitely working. What am I missing?I don't see the text of 0nocn3-d58.ln1 birke.kuehne.cn (see above) in bugzilla. A copy of the message was received by puremagic.com: http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-bugs/2006-June/001392.html Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFE7rmfLK5blCcjpWoRAheiAJ9Tn1Wca5nxfKdT/QBuaKVBCGmeiACfZyvR TE1XiMzE4fRKyL3snuWdwko= =5qIH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Aug 25 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brad Roberts schrieb am 2006-08-25:Ok.. that'd be because that message came in while the regexp for matching subjects was still looking only at \[Bug \d+\] instead of \[(Bug|Issue) \d+\]. The regexp was fixed on July 12th and had been broken since approx June 11th. I did not attempt to re-capture messages from that span of time. Yours are arguably of high enough value to want to try to do that, or at least do that for the dstress additions. I'll add that to my todo list for this weekend.Thanks, Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFE8DnHLK5blCcjpWoRArPeAJ0btnJHfcEX7mwSVtCJj6mClZwe3wCaA5gi lpCV3+FvwnGa2H4hHFayesk= =VYwY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Aug 26 2006
Brad Roberts wrote:Oskar Linde wrote:Hum, I didn't know bugzilla did that. For reference, is it possible for one to use the same email address in a NG post, but prevent bugzilla from integrating the message? If so how? (I think it's good to have the ability to have "out-of-band" bug discussions) -- Bruno Medeiros - MSc in CS/E student http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#DThomas Kuehne wrote:It does, but only if the message comes from someone with a registered email address. If the address doesn't exist, the msg isn't captured. Later, Brad-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 d-bugmail puremagic.com schrieb am 2006-08-24:It used to do so. I reported this as issue 243. Not sure anyone responsible noticed though. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=243 /Oskarhttp://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=220 This appears to have been sliently fixed - at least in works in DMD 0.165 Windows. Probably should be in DStress, though, in case it reappears.Strange, I thougth bugzilla integrated messages posted in the news group?
Aug 25 2006
Bruno Medeiros wrote:Brad Roberts wrote:As Brad said, if you make sure the subject doesn't match the issue or bug regexp, it will not go into the bugzilla. /OskarOskar Linde wrote:Hum, I didn't know bugzilla did that. For reference, is it possible for one to use the same email address in a NG post, but prevent bugzilla from integrating the message? If so how? (I think it's good to have the ability to have "out-of-band" bug discussions)Thomas Kuehne wrote:It does, but only if the message comes from someone with a registered email address. If the address doesn't exist, the msg isn't captured. Later, Brad-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 d-bugmail puremagic.com schrieb am 2006-08-24:It used to do so. I reported this as issue 243. Not sure anyone responsible noticed though. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=243 /Oskarhttp://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=220 This appears to have been sliently fixed - at least in works in DMD 0.165 Windows. Probably should be in DStress, though, in case it reappears.Strange, I thougth bugzilla integrated messages posted in the news group?
Aug 25 2006