• Marcio Faustino (6/6) Jan 27 2006 Hi all,
• Roberto Mariottini (6/10) Jan 27 2006 IIRC, from a long discussion in the D newsgroup, it was later decided th...
• Marcio Faustino (4/16) Jan 27 2006 Sorry I didn't know that, but still func2() should cause a compile error...
• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jari-Matti_M=E4kel=E4?= (7/24) Feb 16 2006 Confirmed with dmd 0.147 on linux. func2() should produce an error, but

Marcio Faustino <Marcio_member pathlink.com> writes:

Hi all,

The examples func2() and func3() from
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/statement.html compile without any warning, where
it should be an error.

--
Marcio Faustino

Roberto Mariottini <Roberto_member pathlink.com> writes:

In article <drcmmp$kuh$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Marcio Faustino says...
Hi all,

The examples func2() and func3() from
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/statement.html compile without any warning, where
it should be an error.

IIRC, from a long discussion in the D newsgroup, it was later decided that func3
should be legal code, while func2 and func4 should issue an error.

Ciao
---
http://www.mariottini.net/roberto/

Marcio Faustino <Marcio_member pathlink.com> writes:

In article <drcpts$o9s$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Roberto Mariottini says...
In article <drcmmp$kuh$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Marcio Faustino says...
Hi all,

The examples func2() and func3() from
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/statement.html compile without any warning, where
it should be an error.

IIRC, from a long discussion in the D newsgroup, it was later decided that func3
should be legal code, while func2 and func4 should issue an error.

Ciao
---
http://www.mariottini.net/roberto/

Sorry I didn't know that, but still func2() should cause a compile error.

--
Marcio Faustino

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jari-Matti_M=E4kel=E4?= <jmjmak utu.fi.invalid> writes:

Marcio Faustino wrote:
 In article <drcpts$o9s$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Roberto Mariottini says...
 In article <drcmmp$kuh$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Marcio Faustino says...
 Hi all,

 The examples func2() and func3() from
 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/statement.html compile without any warning, where
 it should be an error.

 IIRC, from a long discussion in the D newsgroup, it was later decided that
func3
 should be legal code, while func2 and func4 should issue an error.

 Ciao
 ---
 http://www.mariottini.net/roberto/

 
 Sorry I didn't know that, but still func2() should cause a compile error.

Confirmed with dmd 0.147 on linux. func2() should produce an error, but
it doesn't.

There's also an error in the docs - func3() should be legal, because
previous x is introduced in it's own scope inside the first block.

-- 
Jari-Matti