• Ben Hinkle (8/8) Sep 08 2005 In order to make phobos development more organized I've made a wiki page...
• Ben Hinkle (8/17) Sep 09 2005 I noticed Doug Clugston added a todo for std.math. huzzah!
• Walter Bright (11/28) Sep 10 2005 mind
• Ben Hinkle (2/7) Sep 10 2005 Hmm. I thought the DocComments were for comments about the documentation...
• Walter Bright (7/14) Sep 10 2005 With

"Ben Hinkle" <bhinkle mathworks.com> writes:

In order to make phobos development more organized I've made a wiki page for 
phobos bugs and tasks and added a few initial items that came to mind
http://www.wikiservice.at/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?PhobosToDo
I'm posting here to see if other people have any interest in using wiki for 
this purpose (or in general if orginaizing phobos development is a good idea 
at all). Personally I'd still like to hear anything from Walter about what 
he thinks of any attempts to organize phobos development. It seems like a 
pity to see the same bugs sitting around for release after release. 

"Ben Hinkle" <bhinkle mathworks.com> writes:

"Ben Hinkle" <bhinkle mathworks.com> wrote in message 
news:dfplh3$2utf$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 In order to make phobos development more organized I've made a wiki page 
 for phobos bugs and tasks and added a few initial items that came to mind
 http://www.wikiservice.at/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?PhobosToDo
 I'm posting here to see if other people have any interest in using wiki 
 for this purpose (or in general if orginaizing phobos development is a 
 good idea at all). Personally I'd still like to hear anything from Walter 
 about what he thinks of any attempts to organize phobos development. It 
 seems like a pity to see the same bugs sitting around for release after 
 release.

I noticed Doug Clugston added a todo for std.math. huzzah!
Since the PhobosToDo wiki page is not the right place for full details about 
a task I added individual wiki pages for specifics (with back links to 
PhobosToDo). Now there are two more phobos pages PhobosNonUSDate and 
PhobosMath2toMath waiting for more details about what the task is. Currently 
they just have links to the newsgroup discussions about the issues. 

"Walter Bright" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:

"Ben Hinkle" <bhinkle mathworks.com> wrote in message
news:dfs9bh$24tr$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 "Ben Hinkle" <bhinkle mathworks.com> wrote in message
 news:dfplh3$2utf$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 In order to make phobos development more organized I've made a wiki page
 for phobos bugs and tasks and added a few initial items that came to


mind
 http://www.wikiservice.at/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?PhobosToDo
 I'm posting here to see if other people have any interest in using wiki
 for this purpose (or in general if orginaizing phobos development is a
 good idea at all). Personally I'd still like to hear anything from


Walter
 about what he thinks of any attempts to organize phobos development. It
 seems like a pity to see the same bugs sitting around for release after
 release.

 I noticed Doug Clugston added a todo for std.math. huzzah!
 Since the PhobosToDo wiki page is not the right place for full details

about
 a task I added individual wiki pages for specifics (with back links to
 PhobosToDo). Now there are two more phobos pages PhobosNonUSDate and
 PhobosMath2toMath waiting for more details about what the task is.

Currently
 they just have links to the newsgroup discussions about the issues.

I think using a wiki for this purpose is probably the best approach. With
the latest documentation, each web page has a link to a wiki page for
comments, suggestions, bugs, etc. How about just using the
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?DocComments/Phobos, which is linked
to from the Phobos main page, for the todo list?

"Ben Hinkle" <ben.hinkle gmail.com> writes:

 I think using a wiki for this purpose is probably the best approach. With
 the latest documentation, each web page has a link to a wiki page for
 comments, suggestions, bugs, etc. How about just using the
 http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?DocComments/Phobos, which is linked
 to from the Phobos main page, for the todo list?

Hmm. I thought the DocComments were for comments about the documentation 
only. I'll check it out, though. 

"Walter Bright" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:

"Ben Hinkle" <ben.hinkle gmail.com> wrote in message
news:dfvi03$n9i$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 I think using a wiki for this purpose is probably the best approach.


With
 the latest documentation, each web page has a link to a wiki page for
 comments, suggestions, bugs, etc. How about just using the
 http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?DocComments/Phobos, which is


linked
 to from the Phobos main page, for the todo list?

 Hmm. I thought the DocComments were for comments about the documentation
 only. I'll check it out, though.

At the moment, I don't see much point in trying to divide up the two, as
there isn't enough traffic to justify it, and because most issues will have
a foot in both departments.