• D. Trebbien (10/10) May 30 2005 Is this a bug?
• Stewart Gordon (9/21) May 31 2005 Several syntaxes have been proposed for array literals. Including

D. Trebbien <D._member pathlink.com> writes:

Is this a bug?

int[] getStuff()
{
return new int[];
}

If not, maybe it should be added to the spec? This would also be nice:

int[] getStuff()
{
return new int[] [3,2,1,-4];
}

Stewart Gordon <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> writes:

D. Trebbien wrote:
 Is this a bug?
 
 int[] getStuff()
 {
 return new int[];
 }

Where did you find that code?  What do you think it should be instead?

 If not, maybe it should be added to the spec? This would also be nice:
 
 int[] getStuff()
 {
 return new int[] [3,2,1,-4];
 }

Several syntaxes have been proposed for array literals.  Including 
yours, which is syntactically ambiguous.

http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?digitalmars.D/4065

Stewart.

-- 
My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox.  Please keep replies on 
the 'group where everyone may benefit.