digitalmars.D.bugs - access control bug
- Andrew Fedoniouk (35/35) May 01 2005 three files:
- Derek Parnell (8/51) May 01 2005 int i = Foo.foos(); // compiles fine
- Thomas Kuehne (12/47) May 03 2005 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
- Andrew Fedoniouk (5/60) May 03 2005 Thanks, Thomas,
three files:
/main.d
/test/test.d
/test/sub/subtest.d
---- main.d -----
import test.test;
import test.sub.subtest;
int main(char[][] args)
{
return(test.sub.subtest.bar()) ;
}
----/test/test.d -----
module test.test;
import test.sub.subtest;
class Foo
{
package int foo() { return 5; }
static package int foos() { return 5; }
}
----/test/sub/subtest.d ------
module test.sub.subtest;
import test.test;
int bar()
{
int i = Foo.foos(); // compiles fine
Foo f = new Foo();
int j = f.foo(); // BUG: DMD compiler reports an error: [1]
return 4;
}
-----------------
[1] .\test\sub\subtest.d(9): class test.test.Foo member foo is not
accessible
It is strange as both Foo.foos() and Foo.foo() are methods
of the same class. One is static and other is not.
Correlation of static attribute with access control attribute?
May 01 2005
Derek Parnell <derek psych.ward>
On Sun, 1 May 2005 23:36:02 -0700, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
three files:
/main.d
/test/test.d
/test/sub/subtest.d
---- main.d -----
import test.test;
import test.sub.subtest;
int main(char[][] args)
{
return(test.sub.subtest.bar()) ;
}
----/test/test.d -----
module test.test;
import test.sub.subtest;
class Foo
{
package int foo() { return 5; }
static package int foos() { return 5; }
}
----/test/sub/subtest.d ------
module test.sub.subtest;
import test.test;
int bar()
{
int i = Foo.foos(); // compiles fine
Foo f = new Foo();
int j = f.foo(); // BUG: DMD compiler reports an error: [1]
return 4;
}
-----------------
[1] .\test\sub\subtest.d(9): class test.test.Foo member foo is not
accessible
It is strange as both Foo.foos() and Foo.foo() are methods
of the same class. One is static and other is not.
Correlation of static attribute with access control attribute?
int i = Foo.foos(); // compiles fine
int k = f.foos(); // Fails.
"class test.test.Foo member foos is not accessible"
--
Derek
Melbourne, Australia
2/05/2005 4:52:27 PM
May 01 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Fedoniouk schrieb am Sun, 1 May 2005 23:36:02 -0700:
three files:
/main.d
/test/test.d
/test/sub/subtest.d
---- main.d -----
import test.test;
import test.sub.subtest;
int main(char[][] args)
{
return(test.sub.subtest.bar()) ;
}
----/test/test.d -----
module test.test;
import test.sub.subtest;
class Foo
{
package int foo() { return 5; }
static package int foos() { return 5; }
}
----/test/sub/subtest.d ------
module test.sub.subtest;
import test.test;
int bar()
{
int i = Foo.foos(); // compiles fine
Foo f = new Foo();
int j = f.foo(); // BUG: DMD compiler reports an error: [1]
return 4;
}
-----------------
[1] .\test\sub\subtest.d(9): class test.test.Foo member foo is not
accessible
It is strange as both Foo.foos() and Foo.foo() are methods
of the same class. One is static and other is not.
Correlation of static attribute with access control attribute?
Known problem:
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/package_01.d
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/package_02.d
Thomas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFCd81S3w+/yD4P9tIRAomuAJ9LVObpLB8x++yviP5WN+8KXM8f8gCgyGLO
SvTOZ4Ll1tyM9xxeka51bEE=
=U9Cd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
May 03 2005
Thanks, Thomas, and sorry for increasing entropy. Andrew. "Thomas Kuehne" <thomas-dloop kuehne.thisisspam.cn> wrote in message news:i3vkk2-jm3.ln1 lnews.kuehne.cn...-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Fedoniouk schrieb am Sun, 1 May 2005 23:36:02 -0700:three files: /main.d /test/test.d /test/sub/subtest.d ---- main.d ----- import test.test; import test.sub.subtest; int main(char[][] args) { return(test.sub.subtest.bar()) ; } ----/test/test.d ----- module test.test; import test.sub.subtest; class Foo { package int foo() { return 5; } static package int foos() { return 5; } } ----/test/sub/subtest.d ------ module test.sub.subtest; import test.test; int bar() { int i = Foo.foos(); // compiles fine Foo f = new Foo(); int j = f.foo(); // BUG: DMD compiler reports an error: [1] return 4; } ----------------- [1] .\test\sub\subtest.d(9): class test.test.Foo member foo is not accessible It is strange as both Foo.foos() and Foo.foo() are methods of the same class. One is static and other is not. Correlation of static attribute with access control attribute?Known problem: http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/package_01.d http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/package_02.d Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFCd81S3w+/yD4P9tIRAomuAJ9LVObpLB8x++yviP5WN+8KXM8f8gCgyGLO SvTOZ4Ll1tyM9xxeka51bEE= =U9Cd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
May 03 2005