digitalmars.D.bugs - DMD-0.121 regressions
- Thomas Kuehne (16/16) Apr 17 2005 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
- Derek Parnell (16/39) Apr 18 2005 I've update the graphs at
- =?iso-8859-1?Q?Robert_M=2E_M=FCnch?= (7/16) Apr 21 2005 Thanks for this management summary, that's the info I like :-))
- Stewart Gordon (15/31) Apr 19 2005 Success rate up from 84.0% to 89.7% (we're nearly at the 90% mark, but
- Thomas Kuehne (11/16) Apr 19 2005 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 XFAIL -> ERROR http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/class_07.d PASS -> ERROR http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/typeid_13.d Open issues: http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/dstress.html Complete results: (~1.4 MB) http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/results.html Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFCY1WE3w+/yD4P9tIRAoR3AKCRa6nIwgSORweCx0iHOuHEzYW9nACgrz8m Ql3EwR1UVEN4fcwhw676aAg= =oW1W -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Apr 17 2005
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 08:36:53 +0200, Thomas Kuehne wrote:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 XFAIL -> ERROR http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/class_07.d PASS -> ERROR http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/typeid_13.d Open issues: http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/dstress.html Complete results: (~1.4 MB) http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/results.html Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFCY1WE3w+/yD4P9tIRAoR3AKCRa6nIwgSORweCx0iHOuHEzYW9nACgrz8m Ql3EwR1UVEN4fcwhw676aAg= =oW1W -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----I've update the graphs at http://www.users.bigpond.com/ddparnell/dstress_results.html The salient points are : ** 89.7% pass rate (from 84.0%) ** Good to Bad ratio is now 8.74 (from 5.24). That is, for each failure there are 8.74 successes. ** We had 76 more expected passes. ** We had 21 more expected failures. ** We had 7 fewer unexpected passes. ** We had 74 fewer unexpected failures. ** We had 16 fewer compiler crashes. -- Derek Melbourne, Australia 18/04/2005 5:05:18 PM
Apr 18 2005
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:20:46 +0200, Derek Parnell <derek psych.ward> wrote:The salient points are : ** 89.7% pass rate (from 84.0%) ** Good to Bad ratio is now 8.74 (from 5.24). That is, for each failure there are 8.74 successes. ** We had 76 more expected passes. ** We had 21 more expected failures. ** We had 7 fewer unexpected passes. ** We had 74 fewer unexpected failures. ** We had 16 fewer compiler crashes.Thanks for this management summary, that's the info I like :-)) -- Robert M. Münch Management & IT Freelancer http://www.robertmuench.de
Apr 21 2005
Thomas Kuehne wrote:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 XFAIL -> ERROR http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/class_07.d PASS -> ERROR http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/typeid_13.d Open issues: http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/dstress.html Complete results: (~1.4 MB) http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/results.html ThomasSuccess rate up from 84.0% to 89.7% (we're nearly at the 90% mark, but will we be for long?) Stability rate up from 98.5% to 99.5% (crossed the 99% mark, that must be a milestone!) http://smjg.port5.com/pr/d/dstress.xls BTW I noticed these: 1. Are you sure abstract_08 should error at line 20? It's either this or line 15. The spec doesn't clarify if abstract with a body should be allowed, or what it should mean if it is. 2. You've used the name destructor_04 twice, one in run and one in norun. Stewart. -- My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox. Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit.
Apr 19 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stewart Gordon schrieb am Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:06:23 +0100:BTW I noticed these: 1. Are you sure abstract_08 should error at line 20? It's either this or line 15. The spec doesn't clarify if abstract with a body should be allowed, or what it should mean if it is.Split into abstract_08 and 13.2. You've used the name destructor_04 twice, one in run and one in norun.Thanks, fixed Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFCZO493w+/yD4P9tIRAkuRAJ0UgBCm7akpVCTTZsCFu+yTnOzyrwCgkIjb Y6JUHvpRFT3Odgv1jfQOZ2E= =raW9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Apr 19 2005