• Thomas Kuehne (21/21) Apr 06 2005 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
• Stewart Gordon (8/15) Apr 07 2005
• Thomas Kuehne (11/22) Apr 07 2005 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Thomas Kuehne <thomas-dloop kuehne.thisisspam.cn> writes:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

http://digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html#new0120





Both lines should compile.





The conversion real->complex is still allowed.

Added to DStress as 
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/creal_21.d

Thomas


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFCVEn03w+/yD4P9tIRAtSGAKCQQqJoC97Ee+/Et9Y4gHDoSGxKnACePccE
LRlcSyZSO1XBqYAxSNd5Krg=
=GSCW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Stewart Gordon <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> writes:

Thomas Kuehne wrote:
<snip>
 Both lines should compile.




 
 The conversion real->complex is still allowed.

<snip>

Did you test imaginary->complex as well?

Stewart.


-- 
My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox.  Please keep replies on 
the 'group where everyone may benefit.

Thomas Kuehne <thomas-dloop kuehne.thisisspam.cn> writes:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stewart Gordon schrieb am Thu, 07 Apr 2005 13:29:27 +0100:
 Thomas Kuehne wrote:
<snip>
 Both lines should compile.




 
 The conversion real->complex is still allowed.

<snip>

 Did you test imaginary->complex as well?

Doesn't work either
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/creal_22.d

Thomas


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFCVTj33w+/yD4P9tIRAslIAJ42ISxNbqVDTDTnqAzgOg68w3B46QCgiGIH
TBfoUkOBCarq0JZZMps4rrw=
=17Ln
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----