• Derek Parnell (10/10) Apr 05 2005 [file: test.d]
• zwang (2/9) Apr 06 2005 There's nothing wrong with the code. I would be surprised if it didn't c...
• Regan Heath (5/13) Apr 06 2005 True. IIRC one of the goals of D was to make meaningless code illegal.

Derek Parnell <derek psych.ward> writes:

[file: test.d]
class Foo {}
void main() { new Foo; }


[CMD: dmd -w test.d ]

-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
http://www.dsource.org/projects/build/ v1.19 released 04/Apr/2005
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?FrontPage
6/04/2005 2:41:24 PM

zwang <nehzgnaw gmail.com> writes:

Derek Parnell wrote:
 [file: test.d]
 class Foo {}
 void main() { new Foo; }
 
 
 [CMD: dmd -w test.d ]
 

There's nothing wrong with the code. I would be surprised if it didn't compile.

"Regan Heath" <regan netwin.co.nz> writes:

On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 00:46:05 +0800, zwang <nehzgnaw gmail.com> wrote:
 Derek Parnell wrote:
 [file: test.d]
 class Foo {}
 void main() { new Foo; }
   [CMD: dmd -w test.d ]

 There's nothing wrong with the code. I would be surprised if it didn't  
 compile.

True. IIRC one of the goals of D was to make meaningless code illegal.  
Maybe that is limited to where it commonly causes a bug eg.

a == b; //programmer meant a = b;

Regan