• Derek Parnell (15/15) Feb 14 2005 The following compiles ...
• zwang (4/23) Feb 14 2005 Notice that the 3rd plus should be binded with the 4th slash.
• Derek Parnell (7/22) Feb 14 2005 Thanks...it often only takes another pair of eyes to see the blatantly

Derek Parnell <derek psych.ward> writes:

The following compiles ... 

/+  /+ // +/  +/
void main() {}

But this does not ...

/+  /+ //+/  +/
void main() {}


The only difference is a space after the '//'.
I think that both should compile.

Note that this compiles fine ... 

/+  /+ /*+/  +/
void main() {}

-- 
Derek
Melbourne, Australia
15/02/2005 12:50:47 PM

zwang <nehzgnaw gmail.com> writes:

Derek Parnell wrote:
 The following compiles ... 
 
 /+  /+ // +/  +/
 void main() {}
 
 But this does not ...
 
 /+  /+ //+/  +/
 void main() {}

Notice that the 3rd plus should be binded with the 4th slash.
The code is as uncompilable as the following example:
   /+../+../+...+/

 
 
 The only difference is a space after the '//'.
 I think that both should compile.
 
 Note that this compiles fine ... 
 
 /+  /+ /*+/  +/
 void main() {}
 

Derek Parnell <derek psych.ward> writes:

On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:30:52 +0800, zwang wrote:

 Derek Parnell wrote:
 The following compiles ... 
 
 /+  /+ // +/  +/
 void main() {}
 
 But this does not ...
 
 /+  /+ //+/  +/
 void main() {}

 
 Notice that the 3rd plus should be binded with the 4th slash.
 The code is as uncompilable as the following example:
    /+../+../+...+/
 

Thanks...it often only takes another pair of eyes to see the blatantly
obvious ;-)

-- 
Derek
Melbourne, Australia
15/02/2005 1:51:23 PM