• Nick (23/23) Nov 30 2004 The following code fails. I think it worked in 106.
• Ben Hinkle (6/29) Nov 30 2004 you are right - it worked in 106. I'm on WinXP and my output is
• Walter (1/1) Dec 01 2004 It never did work right. It's fixed now. Thanks.
• Nick (3/4) Dec 02 2004 I should rather be thanking you :-)

Nick <Nick_member pathlink.com> writes:

The following code fails. I think it worked in 106.























Nick

"Ben Hinkle" <ben.hinkle gmail.com> writes:

"Nick" <Nick_member pathlink.com> wrote in message 
news:coi83g$1s76$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 The following code fails. I think it worked in 106.























 Nick

you are right - it worked in 106. I'm on WinXP and my output is
0+0i
0+-8i
0+0i

"Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:

It never did work right. It's fixed now. Thanks.

Nick <Nick_member pathlink.com> writes:

In article <cok3ec$1kim$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...
It never did work right. It's fixed now. Thanks.

I should rather be thanking you :-)

Nick