digitalmars.D.bugs - [OT] wanted: Makefile porter for DStress->Windows

Thomas Kuehne (9/9) Oct 24 2004 Hi everyone,

J C Calvarese (11/24) Nov 16 2004 Are you still looking for help towards this goal?

Thomas Kuehne (14/28) Nov 16 2004 This would be sweet ;) You can find the up-to-date Makefile at:

J C Calvarese (27/50) Nov 21 2004 Okay, I think it's close enough to let you try my program.

Thomas Kuehne (47/83) Nov 22 2004 As std.recls is on strike ... I can't test it :{

J C Calvarese (12/29) Nov 22 2004 I wonder if std.recls is compiled into the Linux version of Phobos. I

Thomas Kuehne (11/18) Nov 23 2004 I played around with recls(1.5.2) and stlsoft-libs(1.7.1) but couldn't

"Thomas Kuehne" <thomas-dloop kuehne.cn> writes:

Hi everyone,

I am looking for someone willing to port a GNUMakefile (7.229 Bytes/239 lines)
to a make
format supported by the make.exe distributed with dmd.
(For the beginning all lines containing "complex" can be ignored as well as all
"complex.mak" files.)

It would be realy nice to be able to compare regression & bug tests results
from Linux and
Windows.

http://dmd.kuehne.cn/dstress.html

Thomas Kuehne

Oct 24 2004

J C Calvarese <jcc7 cox.net> writes:

Thomas Kuehne wrote:
 Hi everyone,
 
 I am looking for someone willing to port a GNUMakefile (7.229 Bytes/239 lines)
to a make
 format supported by the make.exe distributed with dmd.
 (For the beginning all lines containing "complex" can be ignored as well as all
 "complex.mak" files.)
 
 It would be realy nice to be able to compare regression & bug tests results
from Linux and
 Windows.

Are you still looking for help towards this goal?

I'm no expert with makefiles, but I think I could rig-up a program to 
generate a batch file to output parallel results for Windows (based on 
the contents of a directory).

What does the resulting file look like? I don't have Linux set up on my 
machine, so I can't just run it and find out what the produced file 
looks like.

 
 http://dmd.kuehne.cn/dstress.html
 
 Thomas Kuehne  


-- 
Justin (a/k/a jcc7)
http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/

Nov 16 2004

Thomas Kuehne <thomas-dloop kuehne.thisisspam.cn> writes:

J C Calvarese schrieb am Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:22:08 -0600:
 I am looking for someone willing to port a GNUMakefile (7.229 Bytes/239 lines)
to a make
 format supported by the make.exe distributed with dmd.
 (For the beginning all lines containing "complex" can be ignored as well as all
 "complex.mak" files.)
 
 It would be realy nice to be able to compare regression & bug tests results
from Linux and
 Windows.

 Are you still looking for help towards this goal?

Yes.

 I'm no expert with makefiles, but I think I could rig-up a program to 
 generate a batch file to output parallel results for Windows (based on 
 the contents of a directory).

This would be sweet ;) You can find the up-to-date Makefile at:
http://svn.kuehne.cn/dstress/

For every test case the file is scanned for "__DSTRESS_DFLAGS__", and 
- if found - anything following it till the next line break is used
as additional compiler flags. For those additional flags you probably
have to replace "/" with "\\". See run/constructor_04.d for a sample.

 What does the resulting file look like? I don't have Linux set up on my 
 machine, so I can't just run it and find out what the produced file 
 looks like.

A bunch of raw result files:
http://svn.kuehne.cn/dstress/raw_results/

In addition any other output - e.g. compiler errors, wrong assertions, 
etc. - gets appended to the "log.txt" file.

Thanks for your interest.

Thomas

Nov 16 2004

J C Calvarese <jcc7 cox.net> writes:

Thomas Kuehne wrote:
 J C Calvarese schrieb am Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:22:08 -0600:
 
I am looking for someone willing to port a GNUMakefile (7.229 Bytes/239 lines)
to a make
format supported by the make.exe distributed with dmd.
(For the beginning all lines containing "complex" can be ignored as well as all
"complex.mak" files.)

It would be realy nice to be able to compare regression & bug tests results
from Linux and
Windows.

Are you still looking for help towards this goal?

 
 
 Yes.
 
 
I'm no expert with makefiles, but I think I could rig-up a program to 
generate a batch file to output parallel results for Windows (based on 
the contents of a directory).

 
 
 This would be sweet ;) You can find the up-to-date Makefile at:
 http://svn.kuehne.cn/dstress/

Okay, I think it's close enough to let you try my program.

You might want to change the name of the output files and where my 
program is located (and I can help you with that if you want).

I've attached dstresstest.d and create_test.bat. All the other files 
should be created by running create_test.bat and then running test.bat.

All of these files are located in \dstress on my system. They can be 
placed elsewhere, but it'll require changing some code.

dstresstest.d    source code
create_test.bat  compiles dstresstest and creates test.bat
dstresstest.exe  produced by running create_test.bat
test.bat         produced by dstresstest.exe
win32_log.txt    produced by test.bat (logFile)
win32_dmd.txt    produced by test.bat (resultFile)

How does it look? I'm sure I could've done some things in the code 
differently, but I think the concept is valid and it works.

In the process of writing this program, I think I might have found a bug 
in DMD, but I found a work-around. Line 198 shouldn't be necessary (and 
it slows down the program), but the program doesn't work without it. I 
wonder if the problem is the string gets too long, but printing it 
"fixes" the problem.

I guess I'll try to nail down why the work-around is required, but it 
strikes me as a compiler bug and I always have a hard time producing a 
sufficiently short bug report.

-- 
Justin (a/k/a jcc7)
http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/

Nov 21 2004

Thomas Kuehne <thomas-dloop kuehne.thisisspam.cn> writes:

J C Calvarese schrieb am Sun, 21 Nov 2004 18:46:45 -0600:
I am looking for someone willing to port a GNUMakefile (7.229 Bytes/239 lines)
to a make
format supported by the make.exe distributed with dmd.
(For the beginning all lines containing "complex" can be ignored as well as all
"complex.mak" files.)

It would be realy nice to be able to compare regression & bug tests results
from Linux and
Windows.

Are you still looking for help towards this goal?

 
 
 Yes.
 
 
I'm no expert with makefiles, but I think I could rig-up a program to 
generate a batch file to output parallel results for Windows (based on 
the contents of a directory).

 
 
 This would be sweet ;) You can find the up-to-date Makefile at:
 http://svn.kuehne.cn/dstress/

 Okay, I think it's close enough to let you try my program.

 You might want to change the name of the output files and where my 
 program is located (and I can help you with that if you want).

 I've attached dstresstest.d and create_test.bat. All the other files 
 should be created by running create_test.bat and then running test.bat.

 All of these files are located in \dstress on my system. They can be 
 placed elsewhere, but it'll require changing some code.

 dstresstest.d    source code
 create_test.bat  compiles dstresstest and creates test.bat
 dstresstest.exe  produced by running create_test.bat
 test.bat         produced by dstresstest.exe
 win32_log.txt    produced by test.bat (logFile)
 win32_dmd.txt    produced by test.bat (resultFile)

 How does it look? I'm sure I could've done some things in the code 
 differently, but I think the concept is valid and it works.

As std.recls is on strike ... I can't test it :{

I've done some 'blind' editing.

1) Started to change ":", "\\", "\r\n" to OS independent pathSep,
dirSep and lineSep.

2) The files in benchmark partly depend on eachother, thus trying
to compile them as stand-alone files doesn't make sense.

3) The files in "complex" are special - no way to write a generic test
code for them.

4) added shouldRun/shouldntRun as todo targets

Hope I can get hold of a Windows box in order to try your code.

Thomas

begin 644 dstresstest.d.diff.gz
M'XL(`)XJHD$"`]5845.C2!!^/GY%'P]W82$(,6J"Y9:[FKC6I<HMX]UME5H6


M;$G-XV/`><-N HZWA 7'QPKXTRB,&23,,[E1=WH(.Y] %,;0]0,"GW;*(CX=

MP1_"EJ*[ >\FN:3))SP_[I/H<&TN4^3W2 '^CPOPNQ``!0B=3>$J?KP*3\)I
MA/YV<$"!A0+\\D+*_J#AW

MY+AI&0> -_?Q/\_P` VG+B*ZEV0XBQ/_7Q(\ NMY"1!W.(%P!&Q" *<I`9^*


M3%U50`QG`7M)QYMZ%3J#V4CF-85X
M"A-\-5\SM=,,W>_(Q9IF .JHFL1A$W%)8>U0*6K`:!8$7"2-<*ERC;9T&TP3

MLP?Q(C0A_'H6Y:6F<<=?!$<*&X(<KZ"2RZ7\*(/ACVI"^`CJMB;UY%I"%&3D
M)9WEO`A`5+7L/=>6::*56^$[AZ!]P"&PK=T2'4H._"H<6)]>K`])Y/N(?+;`


MG'9#U:KW/\D,VO:^2"'VQ>H4\FN`9>U^;8$(?' )40>$#B=3-[Y7G>H4I>7]
M/&L1B&.YX9 KG>6%;&Q 1G::P^T"D3AC&`*;1E- LVM]`!MN,B`/_W=D:%C"

MG\\S3/93MNRWC%8E)LMM!CSC#N_D%'A]RYOY,]S$-_2PK*6LE;1ZJ?NL1?D6
M6MHJ6 EN;(:3LAEM4<)4Q/NZ84<IMS[EC8;0%^I9[4_KN``3-QXV'HKLEF6T

MJORKG5Z_(VU]_]+O._"V+37+Y)L^<[,F6A$FY48WT]5?(N(J&U:X0(*$K(XL
M8'U]O8LQ>=W1WL&&7,G9>#M4Q0KZ.ULEANSFK?V4&FT\YNZ^7'TVX4=*C^WY
M4>;(CY0D'^'(1WE2X(I>W Z])X58$IUW*%2(PZ+"NXK0X"KTP )FIFEFL"VC
M71[W89.54;$Z\A6R25!R(^%L+,R_'U0`L&EZH7_O1Y%/QV_A4,&:)RB]UR,C
M%]GF;(I_?QC[$8.O?YYMFX42M9X*=?])6=F+-^RV83=`;^"F"N_IH9(W-7D6
M7YYKY$""E2>?R\\ERTD),C]/B3XF/F^((VGAXT9"(C=V\2?4=K3<.7Z AX$[
MO$\"-YE`[483WZ?0`2^<)X5XEI\X8L)F,<T^C=42/+WNJ*M'V!=$EJ=7\>U'
*^0_;;)N`(!0`````
`
end

Nov 22 2004

J C Calvarese <jcc7 cox.net> writes:

Thomas Kuehne wrote:
 As std.recls is on strike ... I can't test it :{

I wonder if std.recls is compiled into the Linux version of Phobos. I 
vaguely remember that there used to be a problem where it was left out 
of the make routine for the Linux version or something like that.

 I've done some 'blind' editing.
 
 1) Started to change ":", "\\", "\r\n" to OS independent pathSep,
 dirSep and lineSep.
 
 2) The files in benchmark partly depend on eachother, thus trying
 to compile them as stand-alone files doesn't make sense.
 
 3) The files in "complex" are special - no way to write a generic test
 code for them.
 
 4) added shouldRun/shouldntRun as todo targets

Well, it still runs after I patched your changes, so I don't see 
anything wrong with them.

I'm attaching the latest results in case you want to examine them.

 
 Hope I can get hold of a Windows box in order to try your code.

Oh, I didn't realize you didn't have access to a Windows machine. I just 
thought you prefered Linux.

 
 Thomas


-- 
Justin (a/k/a jcc7)
http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/

Nov 22 2004

Thomas Kuehne <thomas-dloop kuehne.thisisspam.cn> writes:

J C Calvarese schrieb am Dienstag, 23. November 2004 02:18:
 As std.recls is on strike ... I can't test it :{

 
 I wonder if std.recls is compiled into the Linux version of Phobos. I
 vaguely remember that there used to be a problem where it was left out
 of the make routine for the Linux version or something like that.

I played around with recls(1.5.2) and stlsoft-libs(1.7.1) but couldn't
compile them - neither with gcc-3.4.3 nor gcc-3.3.2 ...

 Well, it still runs after I patched your changes, so I don't see
 anything wrong with them.

Thanks for the results - As it turns out there were some issues. :D

1) I forgot a break statement
2) XFAIL and FAIL were mixed up
3) Stripped of the file ending in order to ease the table generation
    (*.html and *.htm are also valid source files)

I have added your files to DStress:
http://svn.kuehne.cn/dstress/beta/

Thomas

Nov 23 2004

D Programming

C/C++ Programming

Other

digitalmars.D.bugs - [OT] wanted: Makefile porter for DStress->Windows