• clayasaurus (5/5) Aug 10 2004 Here are 2 very obvious issues std.loader has in linux that can be easil...
• Matthew (2/7) Aug 26 2004 Looks like this'll be raised from ashes in the guise of Phoenix. ;)
• Arcane Jill (9/10) Aug 26 2004 Hey, can we put a replacement version of "object.d" in Phoenix?
• Matthew (7/17) Aug 26 2004 I think would just cause compile and/or link problems, as dmd would be e...

clayasaurus <clayasaurus_member pathlink.com> writes:

Here are 2 very obvious issues std.loader has in linux that can be easily fixed.


'version(linux)'


adding the loader.o rules to linux.mak. 

"Matthew" <admin.hat stlsoft.dot.org> writes:

"clayasaurus" <clayasaurus_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:cfagl5$21a9$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Here are 2 very obvious issues std.loader has in linux that can be easily
fixed.


 'version(linux)'


 adding the loader.o rules to linux.mak.

Looks like this'll be raised from ashes in the guise of Phoenix. ;)

Arcane Jill <Arcane_member pathlink.com> writes:

In article <cgkf7e$6dk$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Matthew says...

Looks like this'll be raised from ashes in the guise of Phoenix. ;)

Hey, can we put a replacement version of "object.d" in Phoenix?

If so, we can
(1) get rid of Object.opCmp();
(2) have Object.opEquals() return bool instead of int
(3) have Object.toString() return wchar[] instead of char[]
(4) get rid of "alias bit bool;" and replace it with "alias void* bool";

Arcane Jill
(probably posting in the wrong newsgroup, but what the hell?)

"Matthew" <admin.hat stlsoft.dot.org> writes:

"Arcane Jill" <Arcane_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:cgkgbu$6tb$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 In article <cgkf7e$6dk$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Matthew says...

Looks like this'll be raised from ashes in the guise of Phoenix. ;)

 Hey, can we put a replacement version of "object.d" in Phoenix?

 If so, we can
 (1) get rid of Object.opCmp();

I think would just cause compile and/or link problems, as dmd would be
expecting it here and there. (It may work if we
eschew use of array.sort and AAs, but I have no firm idea.)

 (2) have Object.opEquals() return bool instead of int

Doubtful

 (3) have Object.toString() return wchar[] instead of char[]

Very doubtful

 (4) get rid of "alias bit bool;" and replace it with "alias void* bool";

Probably

 Arcane Jill
 (probably posting in the wrong newsgroup, but what the hell?)

Stinky Pete