• Jesse Phillips (18/18) Apr 20 2013 The new std.process by Lars Kyllingstad and Steven Schveighoffer
• John Colvin (5/7) Apr 21 2013 Being relatively new to this community, what is the status quo
• Nick Sabalausky (4/7) Apr 21 2013 In Git master, yes. And then it'll be part of the next official DMD
• John Colvin (2/9) Apr 21 2013 Thanks, good to know.

"Jesse Phillips" <Jessekphillips+d gmail.com> writes:

The new std.process by Lars Kyllingstad and Steven Schveighoffer 
has been accepted with a final count

18/0

On a related note, the voting broke of into several discussions 
related to how to bring proposed libraries into Phobos. 
Specifically the issue being that a Phobos module frozen to 
prevent breaking changes yet these are new modules not getting 
the most thorough testing before inclusion.

Several suggested solutions to this were made; exp/std.exp, 
warning the module is exp when importing, and a combination of 
both (place the module in exp without a warning, also place in 
std publicly importing and placing a warning).

I'm not here to change how things are done. It didn't seem there 
was a consensus, but the hybrid seemed to be fairly appealing.

For now I say we continue as before, and work toward this new 
approach.

Voting thread: 
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/mgstnugckomjpvdgpudz forum.dlang.org

"John Colvin" <john.loughran.colvin gmail.com> writes:

On Saturday, 20 April 2013 at 15:55:30 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:

 For now I say we continue as before, and work toward this new 
 approach.

Being relatively new to this community, what is the status quo 
for including new modules / rewrites of old modules? At some 
point in the next few days will std.process just become the new 
version?

Nick Sabalausky <SeeWebsiteToContactMe semitwist.com> writes:

On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 13:23:21 +0200
"John Colvin" <john.loughran.colvin gmail.com> wrote:
 At some 
 point in the next few days will std.process just become the new 
 version?

In Git master, yes. And then it'll be part of the next official DMD
release (2.063) whenever that comes out.

"John Colvin" <john.loughran.colvin gmail.com> writes:

On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 18:55:06 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
 On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 13:23:21 +0200
 "John Colvin" <john.loughran.colvin gmail.com> wrote:
 At some point in the next few days will std.process just 
 become the new version?

 In Git master, yes. And then it'll be part of the next official 
 DMD
 release (2.063) whenever that comes out.

Thanks, good to know.