www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.announce - layout wiki4d - part 2

reply Matthias Pleh <matthias.pleh gmx.at> writes:
Ok,
as already mentioned in the old thread I have set up a testpage to make 
the suggested (and some other minor) changes.
So we should decide, which layout we should use for the wiki.

a) the old one
b) the current
    http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi
c) the testpage
    http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?MatthiasPleh/TestPage
d) some other layout, anybody want create,


NOTE: the changes, I have made, are public and can changed by every 
wiki-user without registration! So everybody is welcome to improve not 
only the content but also the layout of the wiki!!

greets
Matthias
Jun 06 2010
next sibling parent Robert Clipsham <robert octarineparrot.com> writes:
On 06/06/10 18:14, Matthias Pleh wrote:
 Ok,
 as already mentioned in the old thread I have set up a testpage to make
 the suggested (and some other minor) changes.
 So we should decide, which layout we should use for the wiki.

 a) the old one
 b) the current
 http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi
 c) the testpage
 http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?MatthiasPleh/TestPage
 d) some other layout, anybody want create,


 NOTE: the changes, I have made, are public and can changed by every
 wiki-user without registration! So everybody is welcome to improve not
 only the content but also the layout of the wiki!!

 greets
 Matthias
Both look good, I worry that the test page being similar to the digital mars site will confuse users though... This said, the links on the left hand site are all over the place on digital mars anyway, so maybe not. Robert
Jun 06 2010
prev sibling next sibling parent "Nick Sabalausky" <a a.a> writes:
"Matthias Pleh" <matthias.pleh gmx.at> wrote in message 
news:hugl0q$2bud$1 digitalmars.com...
 Ok,
 as already mentioned in the old thread I have set up a testpage to make 
 the suggested (and some other minor) changes.
 So we should decide, which layout we should use for the wiki.

 a) the old one
 b) the current
    http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi
 c) the testpage
    http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?MatthiasPleh/TestPage
 d) some other layout, anybody want create,


 NOTE: the changes, I have made, are public and can changed by every 
 wiki-user without registration! So everybody is welcome to improve not 
 only the content but also the layout of the wiki!!
I'd be happy with either one. I do really like the nifty colorful left-hand-colors on "b" though. :)
Jun 06 2010
prev sibling next sibling parent "Lars T. Kyllingstad" <public kyllingen.NOSPAMnet> writes:
On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 19:14:01 +0200, Matthias Pleh wrote:

 Ok,
 as already mentioned in the old thread I have set up a testpage to make
 the suggested (and some other minor) changes. So we should decide, which
 layout we should use for the wiki.
 
 a) the old one
 b) the current
     http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi
 c) the testpage
     http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?MatthiasPleh/TestPage
 d) some other layout, anybody want create,
I think both b) and c) look good, but if I had to choose, I'd go with b). I'd use a sans-serif font for the headings, though, like in c). -Lars
Jun 07 2010
prev sibling next sibling parent reply Piotrek <starpit tlen.pl> writes:
W dniu 06.06.2010 19:14, Matthias Pleh pisze:
 Ok,
 as already mentioned in the old thread I have set up a testpage to make
 the suggested (and some other minor) changes.
 So we should decide, which layout we should use for the wiki.

 a) the old one
 b) the current
 http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi
 c) the testpage
 http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?MatthiasPleh/TestPage
 d) some other layout, anybody want create,


 NOTE: the changes, I have made, are public and can changed by every
 wiki-user without registration! So everybody is welcome to improve not
 only the content but also the layout of the wiki!!

 greets
 Matthias
I would go for the layout "b" but with the font definitions from the "c". Cheers Piotrek
Jun 07 2010
parent "Nick Sabalausky" <a a.a> writes:
"Piotrek" <starpit tlen.pl> wrote in message 
news:huj4su$hv0$1 digitalmars.com...
W dniu 06.06.2010 19:14, Matthias Pleh pisze:
 Ok,
 as already mentioned in the old thread I have set up a testpage to make
 the suggested (and some other minor) changes.
 So we should decide, which layout we should use for the wiki.

 a) the old one
 b) the current
 http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi
 c) the testpage
 http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?MatthiasPleh/TestPage
 d) some other layout, anybody want create,


 NOTE: the changes, I have made, are public and can changed by every
 wiki-user without registration! So everybody is welcome to improve not
 only the content but also the layout of the wiki!!

 greets
 Matthias
I would go for the layout "b" but with the font definitions from the "c".
That's a very good idea. I second this. ------------------------------- Not sent from an iPhone.
Jun 07 2010
prev sibling parent reply Matthias Pleh <matthias.pleh gmx.at> writes:
It seems, variant b) is the winner.
I've updated to b) with the font and font-size form c) and some minor 
changes.
I hope you love it.
Enoy

greets
Matthias
Jun 08 2010
parent reply "Lars T. Kyllingstad" <public kyllingen.NOSPAMnet> writes:
On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 22:22:50 +0200, Matthias Pleh wrote:

 It seems, variant b) is the winner.
 I've updated to b) with the font and font-size form c) and some minor
 changes.
 I hope you love it.
 Enoy
 
 greets
 Matthias
Looks good. :) Thanks for taking the time to do it! -Lars
Jun 09 2010
parent Matthias Pleh <matthias.pleh gmx.at> writes:
 Looks good. :)  Thanks for taking the time to do it!

 -Lars
Thanks! :) In the most discussions I had with my coworkers, has been been mentioned, that a community, which even not have a beautiful wiki (besides other issues), can't be a serious project. So I decided to improve this. I hope this small step helps to make D more attractive to new users. greets Matthias
Jun 09 2010