www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.announce - cv2pdb 0.3 released

reply Rainer Schuetze <r.sagitario gmx.de> writes:
Hi,

cv2pdb is a converter of DMD CodeView debug information to PDB debug 
format to make debugging of D applications that were created with the 
Digital Mars compiler, as seamless as possible in current versions of 
Visual Studio.

Major changes since version 0.1:

     * now works on executables compiled by DMC
       (at least works for debugging DMD)
     * removes .debug section from executable
     * new addin to correctly display D style strings
       and derived object type

cv2pdb is available at

     http://www.dsource.org/projects/cv2pdb

Happy debugging,
Rainer Schuetze
Jun 05 2009
next sibling parent reply "Vladimir Panteleev" <thecybershadow gmail.com> writes:
On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:37:38 +0300, Rainer Schuetze <r.sagitario gmx.de>  
wrote:

 Hi,

 cv2pdb is a converter of DMD CodeView debug information to PDB debug  
 format to make debugging of D applications that were created with the  
 Digital Mars compiler, as seamless as possible in current versions of  
 Visual Studio.

 Major changes since version 0.1:

      * now works on executables compiled by DMC
        (at least works for debugging DMD)
      * removes .debug section from executable
      * new addin to correctly display D style strings
        and derived object type

 cv2pdb is available at

      http://www.dsource.org/projects/cv2pdb

 Happy debugging,
 Rainer Schuetze
Hi, did you notice the two tickets I filed yesterday? I haven't tried 0.3 yet, but I couldn't get 0.2 to work at all. -- Best regards, Vladimir mailto:thecybershadow gmail.com
Jun 05 2009
parent Rainer Schuetze <r.sagitario gmx.de> writes:
Hi,

I hadn't checked the tickets (I still have to set it up correctly to be 


We should move discussion about bugs there...

Rainer

Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
 On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:37:38 +0300, Rainer Schuetze <r.sagitario gmx.de> 
 wrote:
 
 Hi,

 cv2pdb is a converter of DMD CodeView debug information to PDB debug 
 format to make debugging of D applications that were created with the 
 Digital Mars compiler, as seamless as possible in current versions of 
 Visual Studio.
Hi, did you notice the two tickets I filed yesterday? I haven't tried 0.3 yet, but I couldn't get 0.2 to work at all.
Jun 05 2009
prev sibling parent reply torhu <no spam.invalid> writes:
On 05.06.2009 09:37, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
 Hi,

 cv2pdb is a converter of DMD CodeView debug information to PDB debug
 format to make debugging of D applications that were created with the
 Digital Mars compiler, as seamless as possible in current versions of
 Visual Studio.
This is great stuff! Maybe the Windows debugger problem is more or less solved with this project. As someone mostly used to msvc 6, I have to say that debugging in msvc 9 is incredibly sluggish in comparison. Most actions in the debugger takes several seconds to complete, while in msvc 6 it's more or less instantaneous. Is that also the case when debugging C++?
Jun 08 2009
next sibling parent reply Rainer Schuetze <r.sagitario gmx.de> writes:
The last time I've been using VC6 is so long ago, I cannot really 
remember... VC7 and VS.NET are maybe a little faster than VS2005/VS2008, 
but to make them stall for seconds is not common neither for C++ nor for D.

The visualizer macros in autoexp.dat are quite complex and can be slow, 
especially if you have associative arrays with a lot of entries. Please 
try it without the autoexp.dat entries.

Rainer

torhu wrote:
 On 05.06.2009 09:37, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
 Hi,

 cv2pdb is a converter of DMD CodeView debug information to PDB debug
 format to make debugging of D applications that were created with the
 Digital Mars compiler, as seamless as possible in current versions of
 Visual Studio.
This is great stuff! Maybe the Windows debugger problem is more or less solved with this project. As someone mostly used to msvc 6, I have to say that debugging in msvc 9 is incredibly sluggish in comparison. Most actions in the debugger takes several seconds to complete, while in msvc 6 it's more or less instantaneous. Is that also the case when debugging C++?
Jun 09 2009
parent torhu <no spam.invalid> writes:
On 09.06.2009 20:44, Rainer Schuetze wrote:

 The visualizer macros in autoexp.dat are quite complex and can be slow,
 especially if you have associative arrays with a lot of entries. Please
 try it without the autoexp.dat entries.
Didn't seem to matter much, but then there were no assoc arrays in the part of the code I debugged.
Jun 11 2009
prev sibling parent reply Bill Baxter <wbaxter gmail.com> writes:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:43 PM, torhu<no spam.invalid> wrote:
 On 05.06.2009 09:37, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
 Hi,

 cv2pdb is a converter of DMD CodeView debug information to PDB debug
 format to make debugging of D applications that were created with the
 Digital Mars compiler, as seamless as possible in current versions of
 Visual Studio.
This is great stuff! =A0Maybe the Windows debugger problem is more or les=
s
 solved with this project.

 As someone mostly used to msvc 6, I have to say that debugging in msvc 9 =
is
 incredibly sluggish in comparison. =A0Most actions in the debugger takes
 several seconds to complete, while in msvc 6 it's more or less
 instantaneous. =A0Is that also the case when debugging C++?
I had an install of msvc 9 that was so incredibly slow that I just couldn't bring myself to use it. But other computers I've used it on are fine. There was nothing particularly slow about that PC where it was running slowly, though. I think it was just a botched install or something. You might try re-installing. --bb
Jun 09 2009
next sibling parent "Nick Sabalausky" <a a.a> writes:
"Bill Baxter" <wbaxter gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:mailman.242.1244575550.13405.digitalmars-d-announce puremagic.com...
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:43 PM, torhu<no spam.invalid> wrote:
 As someone mostly used to msvc 6, I have to say that debugging in msvc 9 
 is
 incredibly sluggish in comparison. Most actions in the debugger takes
 several seconds to complete, while in msvc 6 it's more or less
 instantaneous. Is that also the case when debugging C++?
I had an install of msvc 9 that was so incredibly slow that I just couldn't bring myself to use it. But other computers I've used it on are fine. There was nothing particularly slow about that PC where it was running slowly, though. I think it was just a botched install or something. You might try re-installing.
I used to be a huge user of Visual Studio (starting with about version 4 or 5, IIRC), but I've found that every version of VS starting with the first VS.NET has been noticably slower that the previous (With VS6 of course being the fastest). Because of this, I've been using VS.NET 2008 Express only when
Jun 09 2009
prev sibling parent torhu <no spam.invalid> writes:
On 09.06.2009 21:25, Bill Baxter wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:43 PM, torhu<no spam.invalid>  wrote:
  As someone mostly used to msvc 6, I have to say that debugging in msvc 9 is
  incredibly sluggish in comparison.  Most actions in the debugger takes
  several seconds to complete, while in msvc 6 it's more or less
  instantaneous.  Is that also the case when debugging C++?
I had an install of msvc 9 that was so incredibly slow that I just couldn't bring myself to use it. But other computers I've used it on are fine. There was nothing particularly slow about that PC where it was running slowly, though. I think it was just a botched install or something. You might try re-installing. --bb
I upgraded from msvc 2008 express to 2008 express with service pack 1, and it seems to be a bit faster now. Usable, I think. The installer actually uninstalls the old version first, so I don't know if a reinstall of the same version would have had the same effect.
Jun 11 2009