digitalmars.D.announce - cv2pdb 0.3 released
- Rainer Schuetze (15/15) Jun 05 2009 Hi,
- Vladimir Panteleev (7/22) Jun 05 2009 Hi, did you notice the two tickets I filed yesterday? I haven't tried 0....
- Rainer Schuetze (6/20) Jun 05 2009 Hi,
- torhu (7/12) Jun 08 2009 This is great stuff! Maybe the Windows debugger problem is more or less...
- Rainer Schuetze (8/24) Jun 09 2009 The last time I've been using VC6 is so long ago, I cannot really
- torhu (3/6) Jun 11 2009 Didn't seem to matter much, but then there were no assoc arrays in the
- Bill Baxter (9/24) Jun 09 2009 is
-
Nick Sabalausky
(8/19)
Jun 09 2009
"Bill Baxter"
wrote in message - torhu (5/16) Jun 11 2009 I upgraded from msvc 2008 express to 2008 express with service pack 1,
Hi, cv2pdb is a converter of DMD CodeView debug information to PDB debug format to make debugging of D applications that were created with the Digital Mars compiler, as seamless as possible in current versions of Visual Studio. Major changes since version 0.1: * now works on executables compiled by DMC (at least works for debugging DMD) * removes .debug section from executable * new addin to correctly display D style strings and derived object type cv2pdb is available at http://www.dsource.org/projects/cv2pdb Happy debugging, Rainer Schuetze
Jun 05 2009
On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:37:38 +0300, Rainer Schuetze <r.sagitario gmx.de> wrote:Hi, cv2pdb is a converter of DMD CodeView debug information to PDB debug format to make debugging of D applications that were created with the Digital Mars compiler, as seamless as possible in current versions of Visual Studio. Major changes since version 0.1: * now works on executables compiled by DMC (at least works for debugging DMD) * removes .debug section from executable * new addin to correctly display D style strings and derived object type cv2pdb is available at http://www.dsource.org/projects/cv2pdb Happy debugging, Rainer SchuetzeHi, did you notice the two tickets I filed yesterday? I haven't tried 0.3 yet, but I couldn't get 0.2 to work at all. -- Best regards, Vladimir mailto:thecybershadow gmail.com
Jun 05 2009
Hi, I hadn't checked the tickets (I still have to set it up correctly to be We should move discussion about bugs there... Rainer Vladimir Panteleev wrote:On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:37:38 +0300, Rainer Schuetze <r.sagitario gmx.de> wrote:Hi, cv2pdb is a converter of DMD CodeView debug information to PDB debug format to make debugging of D applications that were created with the Digital Mars compiler, as seamless as possible in current versions of Visual Studio.Hi, did you notice the two tickets I filed yesterday? I haven't tried 0.3 yet, but I couldn't get 0.2 to work at all.
Jun 05 2009
On 05.06.2009 09:37, Rainer Schuetze wrote:Hi, cv2pdb is a converter of DMD CodeView debug information to PDB debug format to make debugging of D applications that were created with the Digital Mars compiler, as seamless as possible in current versions of Visual Studio.This is great stuff! Maybe the Windows debugger problem is more or less solved with this project. As someone mostly used to msvc 6, I have to say that debugging in msvc 9 is incredibly sluggish in comparison. Most actions in the debugger takes several seconds to complete, while in msvc 6 it's more or less instantaneous. Is that also the case when debugging C++?
Jun 08 2009
The last time I've been using VC6 is so long ago, I cannot really remember... VC7 and VS.NET are maybe a little faster than VS2005/VS2008, but to make them stall for seconds is not common neither for C++ nor for D. The visualizer macros in autoexp.dat are quite complex and can be slow, especially if you have associative arrays with a lot of entries. Please try it without the autoexp.dat entries. Rainer torhu wrote:On 05.06.2009 09:37, Rainer Schuetze wrote:Hi, cv2pdb is a converter of DMD CodeView debug information to PDB debug format to make debugging of D applications that were created with the Digital Mars compiler, as seamless as possible in current versions of Visual Studio.This is great stuff! Maybe the Windows debugger problem is more or less solved with this project. As someone mostly used to msvc 6, I have to say that debugging in msvc 9 is incredibly sluggish in comparison. Most actions in the debugger takes several seconds to complete, while in msvc 6 it's more or less instantaneous. Is that also the case when debugging C++?
Jun 09 2009
On 09.06.2009 20:44, Rainer Schuetze wrote:The visualizer macros in autoexp.dat are quite complex and can be slow, especially if you have associative arrays with a lot of entries. Please try it without the autoexp.dat entries.Didn't seem to matter much, but then there were no assoc arrays in the part of the code I debugged.
Jun 11 2009
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:43 PM, torhu<no spam.invalid> wrote:On 05.06.2009 09:37, Rainer Schuetze wrote:sHi, cv2pdb is a converter of DMD CodeView debug information to PDB debug format to make debugging of D applications that were created with the Digital Mars compiler, as seamless as possible in current versions of Visual Studio.This is great stuff! =A0Maybe the Windows debugger problem is more or les=solved with this project. As someone mostly used to msvc 6, I have to say that debugging in msvc 9 =isincredibly sluggish in comparison. =A0Most actions in the debugger takes several seconds to complete, while in msvc 6 it's more or less instantaneous. =A0Is that also the case when debugging C++?I had an install of msvc 9 that was so incredibly slow that I just couldn't bring myself to use it. But other computers I've used it on are fine. There was nothing particularly slow about that PC where it was running slowly, though. I think it was just a botched install or something. You might try re-installing. --bb
Jun 09 2009
"Bill Baxter" <wbaxter gmail.com> wrote in message news:mailman.242.1244575550.13405.digitalmars-d-announce puremagic.com... On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:43 PM, torhu<no spam.invalid> wrote:I used to be a huge user of Visual Studio (starting with about version 4 or 5, IIRC), but I've found that every version of VS starting with the first VS.NET has been noticably slower that the previous (With VS6 of course being the fastest). Because of this, I've been using VS.NET 2008 Express only whenAs someone mostly used to msvc 6, I have to say that debugging in msvc 9 is incredibly sluggish in comparison. Most actions in the debugger takes several seconds to complete, while in msvc 6 it's more or less instantaneous. Is that also the case when debugging C++?I had an install of msvc 9 that was so incredibly slow that I just couldn't bring myself to use it. But other computers I've used it on are fine. There was nothing particularly slow about that PC where it was running slowly, though. I think it was just a botched install or something. You might try re-installing.
Jun 09 2009
On 09.06.2009 21:25, Bill Baxter wrote:On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:43 PM, torhu<no spam.invalid> wrote:I upgraded from msvc 2008 express to 2008 express with service pack 1, and it seems to be a bit faster now. Usable, I think. The installer actually uninstalls the old version first, so I don't know if a reinstall of the same version would have had the same effect.As someone mostly used to msvc 6, I have to say that debugging in msvc 9 is incredibly sluggish in comparison. Most actions in the debugger takes several seconds to complete, while in msvc 6 it's more or less instantaneous. Is that also the case when debugging C++?I had an install of msvc 9 that was so incredibly slow that I just couldn't bring myself to use it. But other computers I've used it on are fine. There was nothing particularly slow about that PC where it was running slowly, though. I think it was just a botched install or something. You might try re-installing. --bb
Jun 11 2009