digitalmars.D.announce - MYPERDATA
- Georg Wrede (33/33) Apr 05 2007 For several separate reasons, I have decided to publish my contact
- Anders Bergh (5/38) Apr 05 2007 I'm on GMail so spam is not an issue for me. Spam bots, I challenge
- Dave (5/59) Apr 06 2007 Hmmm... Is the GMail spam filter that good? If so, awesome. I'd never he...
- Anders Bergh (5/64) Apr 06 2007 Yes, you can use POP3/SMTP. I used to do so, but I really like the web
- Bruno Medeiros (8/11) Apr 07 2007 Indeed, it's much better. The "conversation" features is simply the next...
- Anders Bergh (7/18) Apr 08 2007 Conversion features? Not sure what you are talking about :/
- Bruno Medeiros (6/30) Apr 09 2007 I said 'conversation', not 'conversion'. I'm referring to the feature
- Max Bolingbroke (7/10) Apr 09 2007 Thunderbird has had this feature since v1.0 at least. If you just click
- Daniel Keep (13/25) Apr 09 2007 Not quite the same, since it doesn't include messages that *you* have
- =?UTF-8?B?SmFyaS1NYXR0aSBNw6RrZWzDpA==?= (2/14) Apr 09 2007 It does, but first you have to move your own messages to the same folder...
- Anders Bergh (4/6) Apr 09 2007 --
- Dave (11/89) Apr 08 2007 Thanks - the reason for not using the web interface is because I like ev...
- Max Bolingbroke (6/10) Apr 08 2007 Like its predecessors, Outlook 2007 has no support for newsgroups :).
- Anders Bergh (5/94) Apr 08 2007 Gmail can actually be set up to receive mail from POP3 servers, which
- janderson (5/59) Apr 08 2007 In my experience it does a better job then other programs. But some
For several separate reasons, I have decided to publish my contact xxyxxxx information here. (The x's are just to con robots.) I imagine that publishing it thusly will be obvious to all of you, and still unavailable to trivial robots, so here goes: me: Georg Wrede // name, or my average signature... write: georg.wrede after the funny a, [possibly several parts here] part 1: iki part 0: fi Can't figure it out? Too bad. Then you're either a robot, or not worthy of reading this NG in the first place. <smiley of condescending distaste and aggression> --- I challenge you to reply to this with yours. For all of us, saving these would be appropriate, right. --- Ah, and thinking a bit more on this, let's agree on that whenever we unexpectedly mail each other we'll put the magic letters 'DMD' at the beginning of the Subject! "DMD Wow, I loved your last post about arrays of references to indirect addresses of AAs sorted by bovine dung!" This way the post will pass my junk-mail filter, "and that's not all!" It'll get priority treatment when visually browsing through the new headers. DMD here stands for Digital Mars D language, not for the DMD compiler as opposed to GDC or whatever. (Do I really have to spell this out?) --- At first I had a reasonable heading to this post, but then I got the idea that we'll need to do this every 6 to 12 months anyway, so a stupid but unforgettable heading would be apropriate, so, the first guy after the "6 months" ought to create a new thread with the same heading. (And even forgetting this particular header, simply searching for single-word all-caps headers gets you a long way.)
Apr 05 2007
I'm on GMail so spam is not an issue for me. Spam bots, I challenge you: anders1 gmail.com. On 4/6/07, Georg Wrede <georg nospam.org> wrote:For several separate reasons, I have decided to publish my contact xxyxxxx information here. (The x's are just to con robots.) I imagine that publishing it thusly will be obvious to all of you, and still unavailable to trivial robots, so here goes: me: Georg Wrede // name, or my average signature... write: georg.wrede after the funny a, [possibly several parts here] part 1: iki part 0: fi Can't figure it out? Too bad. Then you're either a robot, or not worthy of reading this NG in the first place. <smiley of condescending distaste and aggression> --- I challenge you to reply to this with yours. For all of us, saving these would be appropriate, right. --- Ah, and thinking a bit more on this, let's agree on that whenever we unexpectedly mail each other we'll put the magic letters 'DMD' at the beginning of the Subject! "DMD Wow, I loved your last post about arrays of references to indirect addresses of AAs sorted by bovine dung!" This way the post will pass my junk-mail filter, "and that's not all!" It'll get priority treatment when visually browsing through the new headers. DMD here stands for Digital Mars D language, not for the DMD compiler as opposed to GDC or whatever. (Do I really have to spell this out?) --- At first I had a reasonable heading to this post, but then I got the idea that we'll need to do this every 6 to 12 months anyway, so a stupid but unforgettable heading would be apropriate, so, the first guy after the "6 months" ought to create a new thread with the same heading. (And even forgetting this particular header, simply searching for single-word all-caps headers gets you a long way.)-- Anders
Apr 05 2007
Hmmm... Is the GMail spam filter that good? If so, awesome. I'd never heard of that prior to this. BTW - Can I use GMail with my favorite 'fat' email client? Thanks, - Dave Anders Bergh wrote:I'm on GMail so spam is not an issue for me. Spam bots, I challenge you: anders1 gmail.com. On 4/6/07, Georg Wrede <georg nospam.org> wrote:For several separate reasons, I have decided to publish my contact xxyxxxx information here. (The x's are just to con robots.) I imagine that publishing it thusly will be obvious to all of you, and still unavailable to trivial robots, so here goes: me: Georg Wrede // name, or my average signature... write: georg.wrede after the funny a, [possibly several parts here] part 1: iki part 0: fi Can't figure it out? Too bad. Then you're either a robot, or not worthy of reading this NG in the first place. <smiley of condescending distaste and aggression> --- I challenge you to reply to this with yours. For all of us, saving these would be appropriate, right. --- Ah, and thinking a bit more on this, let's agree on that whenever we unexpectedly mail each other we'll put the magic letters 'DMD' at the beginning of the Subject! "DMD Wow, I loved your last post about arrays of references to indirect addresses of AAs sorted by bovine dung!" This way the post will pass my junk-mail filter, "and that's not all!" It'll get priority treatment when visually browsing through the new headers. DMD here stands for Digital Mars D language, not for the DMD compiler as opposed to GDC or whatever. (Do I really have to spell this out?) --- At first I had a reasonable heading to this post, but then I got the idea that we'll need to do this every 6 to 12 months anyway, so a stupid but unforgettable heading would be apropriate, so, the first guy after the "6 months" ought to create a new thread with the same heading. (And even forgetting this particular header, simply searching for single-word all-caps headers gets you a long way.)
Apr 06 2007
Yes, you can use POP3/SMTP. I used to do so, but I really like the web interface :-) On 4/6/07, Dave <Dave_member pathlink.com> wrote:Hmmm... Is the GMail spam filter that good? If so, awesome. I'd never heard of that prior to this. BTW - Can I use GMail with my favorite 'fat' email client? Thanks, - Dave Anders Bergh wrote:-- AndersI'm on GMail so spam is not an issue for me. Spam bots, I challenge you: anders1 gmail.com. On 4/6/07, Georg Wrede <georg nospam.org> wrote:For several separate reasons, I have decided to publish my contact xxyxxxx information here. (The x's are just to con robots.) I imagine that publishing it thusly will be obvious to all of you, and still unavailable to trivial robots, so here goes: me: Georg Wrede // name, or my average signature... write: georg.wrede after the funny a, [possibly several parts here] part 1: iki part 0: fi Can't figure it out? Too bad. Then you're either a robot, or not worthy of reading this NG in the first place. <smiley of condescending distaste and aggression> --- I challenge you to reply to this with yours. For all of us, saving these would be appropriate, right. --- Ah, and thinking a bit more on this, let's agree on that whenever we unexpectedly mail each other we'll put the magic letters 'DMD' at the beginning of the Subject! "DMD Wow, I loved your last post about arrays of references to indirect addresses of AAs sorted by bovine dung!" This way the post will pass my junk-mail filter, "and that's not all!" It'll get priority treatment when visually browsing through the new headers. DMD here stands for Digital Mars D language, not for the DMD compiler as opposed to GDC or whatever. (Do I really have to spell this out?) --- At first I had a reasonable heading to this post, but then I got the idea that we'll need to do this every 6 to 12 months anyway, so a stupid but unforgettable heading would be apropriate, so, the first guy after the "6 months" ought to create a new thread with the same heading. (And even forgetting this particular header, simply searching for single-word all-caps headers gets you a long way.)
Apr 06 2007
Anders Bergh wrote:Yes, you can use POP3/SMTP. I used to do so, but I really like the web interface :-)Indeed, it's much better. The "conversation" features is simply the next paradigm. I wonder why it's taking so long for offline clients to pick that up. I'm hopping that Thunderbird 2 will have it. (haven't yet checked if that's the case) -- Bruno Medeiros - MSc in CS/E student http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D
Apr 07 2007
Conversion features? Not sure what you are talking about :/ What I like about Gmail is that it's a lot like the rest of Google - you search through your mail. I love labels, and the search feature is great. On 4/7/07, Bruno Medeiros <brunodomedeiros+spam com.gmail> wrote:Anders Bergh wrote:-- AndersYes, you can use POP3/SMTP. I used to do so, but I really like the web interface :-)Indeed, it's much better. The "conversation" features is simply the next paradigm. I wonder why it's taking so long for offline clients to pick that up. I'm hopping that Thunderbird 2 will have it. (haven't yet checked if that's the case) -- Bruno Medeiros - MSc in CS/E student http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D
Apr 08 2007
Anders Bergh wrote:Conversion features? Not sure what you are talking about :/ What I like about Gmail is that it's a lot like the rest of Google - you search through your mail. I love labels, and the search feature is great. On 4/7/07, Bruno Medeiros <brunodomedeiros+spam com.gmail> wrote:I said 'conversation', not 'conversion'. I'm referring to the feature that groups related email messages as a thread. -- Bruno Medeiros - MSc in CS/E student http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#DAnders Bergh wrote:Yes, you can use POP3/SMTP. I used to do so, but I really like the web interface :-)Indeed, it's much better. The "conversation" features is simply the next paradigm. I wonder why it's taking so long for offline clients to pick that up. I'm hopping that Thunderbird 2 will have it. (haven't yet checked if that's the case) -- Bruno Medeiros - MSc in CS/E student http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D
Apr 09 2007
Bruno Medeiros wrote:I said 'conversation', not 'conversion'. I'm referring to the feature that groups related email messages as a thread.Thunderbird has had this feature since v1.0 at least. If you just click the column heading in the top left it will group messages into navigable tree structures that indicate exactly the reply order. Outlook has the same option called, IIRC, "Conversation View". HTH Max
Apr 09 2007
Max Bolingbroke wrote:Bruno Medeiros wrote:Not quite the same, since it doesn't include messages that *you* have sent (at least, not for mail; it obviously does for newsgroups). -- Daniel -- int getRandomNumber() { return 4; // chosen by fair dice roll. // guaranteed to be random. } http://xkcd.com/ v2sw5+8Yhw5ln4+5pr6OFPma8u6+7Lw4Tm6+7l6+7D i28a2Xs3MSr2e4/6+7t4TNSMb6HTOp5en5g6RAHCP http://hackerkey.com/I said 'conversation', not 'conversion'. I'm referring to the feature that groups related email messages as a thread.Thunderbird has had this feature since v1.0 at least. If you just click the column heading in the top left it will group messages into navigable tree structures that indicate exactly the reply order. Outlook has the same option called, IIRC, "Conversation View". HTH Max
Apr 09 2007
=?UTF-8?B?SmFyaS1NYXR0aSBNw6RrZWzDpA==?= <jmjmak utu.fi.invalid> Daniel Keep wrote:Max Bolingbroke wrote:Bruno Medeiros wrote:I said 'conversation', not 'conversion'. I'm referring to the feature that groups related email messages as a thread.Thunderbird has had this feature since v1.0 at least. If you just click the column heading in the top left it will group messages into navigable tree structures that indicate exactly the reply order. Outlook has the same option called, IIRC, "Conversation View".Not quite the same, since it doesn't include messages that *you* have sent (at least, not for mail; it obviously does for newsgroups).It does, but first you have to move your own messages to the same folder.
Apr 09 2007
Oops, my mistake. I should have re-read before posting! On 4/9/07, Bruno Medeiros <brunodomedeiros+spam com.gmail> wrote:I said 'conversation', not 'conversion'. I'm referring to the feature that groups related email messages as a thread.-- Anders
Apr 09 2007
Anders Bergh wrote:Yes, you can use POP3/SMTP. I used to do so, but I really like the web interface :-)Thanks - the reason for not using the web interface is because I like everything in one 'instance'. I have 4 email addresses for various things right now, a bunch of newsgroups, plus I need a calendar application and some sort of unified contact manager. Otherwise I end up have a bunch of browser tabs open, all using a different web client, and a newsreader, and a calendar application, and a separate address book, etc. BTW - Anyone know how well Outlook 2007 handles newsgroups? The Outlook 2000 (which I have) doesn't do newsgroups intrinsically (I know, it's MS but I can justify the cost in about 1 week of normal usage - pretty good ROI). Thanks, - DaveOn 4/6/07, Dave <Dave_member pathlink.com> wrote:Hmmm... Is the GMail spam filter that good? If so, awesome. I'd never heard of that prior to this. BTW - Can I use GMail with my favorite 'fat' email client? Thanks, - Dave Anders Bergh wrote:I'm on GMail so spam is not an issue for me. Spam bots, I challenge you: anders1 gmail.com. On 4/6/07, Georg Wrede <georg nospam.org> wrote:worthyFor several separate reasons, I have decided to publish my contact xxyxxxx information here. (The x's are just to con robots.) I imagine that publishing it thusly will be obvious to all of you, and still unavailable to trivial robots, so here goes: me: Georg Wrede // name, or my average signature... write: georg.wrede after the funny a, [possibly several parts here] part 1: iki part 0: fi Can't figure it out? Too bad. Then you're either a robot, or notindirectof reading this NG in the first place. <smiley of condescending distaste and aggression> --- I challenge you to reply to this with yours. For all of us, saving these would be appropriate, right. --- Ah, and thinking a bit more on this, let's agree on that whenever we unexpectedly mail each other we'll put the magic letters 'DMD' at the beginning of the Subject! "DMD Wow, I loved your last post about arrays of references tocompiler asaddresses of AAs sorted by bovine dung!" This way the post will pass my junk-mail filter, "and that's not all!" It'll get priority treatment when visually browsing through the new headers. DMD here stands for Digital Mars D language, not for the DMDstupidopposed to GDC or whatever. (Do I really have to spell this out?) --- At first I had a reasonable heading to this post, but then I got the idea that we'll need to do this every 6 to 12 months anyway, so a(Andbut unforgettable heading would be apropriate, so, the first guy after the "6 months" ought to create a new thread with the same heading.single-wordeven forgetting this particular header, simply searching forall-caps headers gets you a long way.)
Apr 08 2007
Dave wrote:BTW - Anyone know how well Outlook 2007 handles newsgroups? The Outlook 2000 (which I have) doesn't do newsgroups intrinsically (I know, it's MS but I can justify the cost in about 1 week of normal usage - pretty good ROI).Like its predecessors, Outlook 2007 has no support for newsgroups :). When I have to use Outlook, I add newsgroup support with http://www.mapilab.com/outlook/nntp/, but it dosent have anything like the polish of a true newsgroup reader, unfortunately... Max
Apr 08 2007
Gmail can actually be set up to receive mail from POP3 servers, which is pretty useful :) On 4/8/07, Dave <Dave_member pathlink.com> wrote:Anders Bergh wrote:-- AndersYes, you can use POP3/SMTP. I used to do so, but I really like the web interface :-)Thanks - the reason for not using the web interface is because I like everything in one 'instance'. I have 4 email addresses for various things right now, a bunch of newsgroups, plus I need a calendar application and some sort of unified contact manager. Otherwise I end up have a bunch of browser tabs open, all using a different web client, and a newsreader, and a calendar application, and a separate address book, etc. BTW - Anyone know how well Outlook 2007 handles newsgroups? The Outlook 2000 (which I have) doesn't do newsgroups intrinsically (I know, it's MS but I can justify the cost in about 1 week of normal usage - pretty good ROI). Thanks, - DaveOn 4/6/07, Dave <Dave_member pathlink.com> wrote:Hmmm... Is the GMail spam filter that good? If so, awesome. I'd never heard of that prior to this. BTW - Can I use GMail with my favorite 'fat' email client? Thanks, - Dave Anders Bergh wrote:I'm on GMail so spam is not an issue for me. Spam bots, I challenge you: anders1 gmail.com. On 4/6/07, Georg Wrede <georg nospam.org> wrote:worthyFor several separate reasons, I have decided to publish my contact xxyxxxx information here. (The x's are just to con robots.) I imagine that publishing it thusly will be obvious to all of you, and still unavailable to trivial robots, so here goes: me: Georg Wrede // name, or my average signature... write: georg.wrede after the funny a, [possibly several parts here] part 1: iki part 0: fi Can't figure it out? Too bad. Then you're either a robot, or notindirectof reading this NG in the first place. <smiley of condescending distaste and aggression> --- I challenge you to reply to this with yours. For all of us, saving these would be appropriate, right. --- Ah, and thinking a bit more on this, let's agree on that whenever we unexpectedly mail each other we'll put the magic letters 'DMD' at the beginning of the Subject! "DMD Wow, I loved your last post about arrays of references tocompiler asaddresses of AAs sorted by bovine dung!" This way the post will pass my junk-mail filter, "and that's not all!" It'll get priority treatment when visually browsing through the new headers. DMD here stands for Digital Mars D language, not for the DMDstupidopposed to GDC or whatever. (Do I really have to spell this out?) --- At first I had a reasonable heading to this post, but then I got the idea that we'll need to do this every 6 to 12 months anyway, so a(Andbut unforgettable heading would be apropriate, so, the first guy after the "6 months" ought to create a new thread with the same heading.single-wordeven forgetting this particular header, simply searching forall-caps headers gets you a long way.)
Apr 08 2007
Anders Bergh wrote:I'm on GMail so spam is not an issue for me. Spam bots, I challenge you: anders1 gmail.com.In my experience it does a better job then other programs. But some spam messages still get though. It also sometimes spamifies messages that are legit. Particularly if you write something like "Hay Jim, we haven't spoken for a while. What have u been up to?".On 4/6/07, Georg Wrede <georg nospam.org> wrote:For several separate reasons, I have decided to publish my contact xxyxxxx information here. (The x's are just to con robots.) I imagine that publishing it thusly will be obvious to all of you, and still unavailable to trivial robots, so here goes: me: Georg Wrede // name, or my average signature... write: georg.wrede after the funny a, [possibly several parts here] part 1: iki part 0: fi Can't figure it out? Too bad. Then you're either a robot, or not worthy of reading this NG in the first place. <smiley of condescending distaste and aggression> --- I challenge you to reply to this with yours. For all of us, saving these would be appropriate, right. --- Ah, and thinking a bit more on this, let's agree on that whenever we unexpectedly mail each other we'll put the magic letters 'DMD' at the beginning of the Subject! "DMD Wow, I loved your last post about arrays of references to indirect addresses of AAs sorted by bovine dung!" This way the post will pass my junk-mail filter, "and that's not all!" It'll get priority treatment when visually browsing through the new headers. DMD here stands for Digital Mars D language, not for the DMD compiler as opposed to GDC or whatever. (Do I really have to spell this out?) --- At first I had a reasonable heading to this post, but then I got the idea that we'll need to do this every 6 to 12 months anyway, so a stupid but unforgettable heading would be apropriate, so, the first guy after the "6 months" ought to create a new thread with the same heading. (And even forgetting this particular header, simply searching for single-word all-caps headers gets you a long way.)
Apr 08 2007