• Dicebot (12/12) Nov 17 2016 protected-headers="v1"
• Andrei Alexandrescu (2/6) Nov 17 2016 "does nor argue" -> "does not argue" -- Andrei
• Andrei Alexandrescu (3/7) Nov 17 2016 "to be include" -> "to include" (my bad, also propagated by copypasta in...

Dicebot <public dicebot.lv> writes:

 protected-headers="v1"
From: Dicebot <public dicebot.lv>
Newsgroups: d,i,g,i,t,a,l,m,a,r,s,.,D,.,a,n,n,o,u,n,c,e
Subject: Formal review of DIP1001

--EWWJXDi6vpsB1GeHJfNkhNBGMgLkTcUqC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Disposition: REJECT. A proposal for a similar or identical feature would
need to be include qualitatively new motivation/evidence of usefulness.

Please follow the link for the full review text / rationale:
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1001.md#review


--EWWJXDi6vpsB1GeHJfNkhNBGMgLkTcUqC--

Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> writes:

On 11/17/2016 06:35 AM, Dicebot wrote:
 Disposition: REJECT. A proposal for a similar or identical feature would
 need to be include qualitatively new motivation/evidence of usefulness.

 Please follow the link for the full review text / rationale:
 https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1001.md#review

"does nor argue" -> "does not argue" -- Andrei

Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> writes:

On 11/17/2016 06:35 AM, Dicebot wrote:
 Disposition: REJECT. A proposal for a similar or identical feature would
 need to be include qualitatively new motivation/evidence of usefulness.

 Please follow the link for the full review text / rationale:
 https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1001.md#review

"to be include" -> "to include" (my bad, also propagated by copypasta in 
both responses). -- Andrei