• Mike Parker (8/18) May 27 2021 The authors of DIP 1036, "String Interpolation Tuple Literals",
• M.M. (9/27) May 27 2021 I believe that the discussions around the DIP1036 were fruitful
• Adam D. Ruppe (4/6) May 27 2021 Yeah, there's a few small tweaks I'd make (I opened an issue on

Mike Parker <aldacron gmail.com> writes:

The authors of DIP 1036, "String Interpolation Tuple Literals", 
have chosen to withdraw it from consideration in deference to an 
alternative proposal currently being drafted here:

https://github.com/John-Colvin/YAIDIP

 From the DIP review process documentation:

 Unlike Abandoned DIPs, a Withdrawn DIP cannot be revived 
 without the DIP manager's approval. A DIP author will have a 
 specific reason for withdrawing from the process, and that 
 reason might preclude further consideration of the DIP. For 
 example, a DIP that was withdrawn because it received an 
 overwhelmingly negative response should be rewritten and 
 submitted as a new proposal rather than revived in its original 
 form. If the DIP manager does allow a Withdrawn DIP to be 
 revived, it must begin the review process anew from the first 
 round of Community Review.

https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/docs/process-reviews.md#withdrawn-and-superseded-dips

The DIP's new home is here:

https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/other/DIP1036.md

M.M. <matus email.cz> writes:

On Thursday, 27 May 2021 at 12:14:25 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
 The authors of DIP 1036, "String Interpolation Tuple Literals", 
 have chosen to withdraw it from consideration in deference to 
 an alternative proposal currently being drafted here:

 https://github.com/John-Colvin/YAIDIP

 From the DIP review process documentation:

 Unlike Abandoned DIPs, a Withdrawn DIP cannot be revived 
 without the DIP manager's approval. A DIP author will have a 
 specific reason for withdrawing from the process, and that 
 reason might preclude further consideration of the DIP. For 
 example, a DIP that was withdrawn because it received an 
 overwhelmingly negative response should be rewritten and 
 submitted as a new proposal rather than revived in its 
 original form. If the DIP manager does allow a Withdrawn DIP 
 to be revived, it must begin the review process anew from the 
 first round of Community Review.

 https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/docs/process-reviews.md#withdrawn-and-superseded-dips

 The DIP's new home is here:

 https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/other/DIP1036.md

I believe that the discussions around the DIP1036 were fruitful 
and will contribute to a very good solution for dlang (be it the 
new DIP or another one).

Thank you, Adam and Steven, for drafting the DIP, listening to 
the comments, answering all the questions, and making the second 
and improved version of it.

I assume that you, Adam and Steven, hold the new (YAI)DIP in high 
regards. Is that right?

Adam D. Ruppe <destructionator gmail.com> writes:

On Thursday, 27 May 2021 at 20:42:11 UTC, M.M. wrote:
 I assume that you, Adam and Steven, hold the new (YAI)DIP in 
 high regards. Is that right?

Yeah, there's a few small tweaks I'd make (I opened an issue on 
the repo with them), but I'm pretty happy with it and simplifying 
the goals like it does helps a lot.