• Mike Parker (14/14) Jun 10 2019 DIP 1013, "The Deprecation Process", has been accepted.
• Mike Parker (4/18) Jun 10 2019 And after just posting about how I had forgotten to push a commit
• Nicholas Wilson (3/6) Jun 12 2019 So what is the "version" in @@@DEPRECATED_[version]@@@ supposed
• Jonathan M Davis (5/11) Jun 12 2019 How is it ambiguous? It says right in the same sentence that
• Nicholas Wilson (3/15) Jun 12 2019 Wow. Note to self, don't read post and sleep all at the same time.

Mike Parker <aldacron gmail.com> writes:

DIP 1013, "The Deprecation Process", has been accepted.

After six months without a response from the DIP author, I 
decided to move this DIP out f Post-Final and into Formal 
Assessment rather than marking it as Abandoned. It's a simple DIP 
and it was the last stage of the process, so it seemed a waste 
not to go forward.

Walter and Andrei were willing to accept the DIP with some 
revisions (details in the review summary at the bottom of the 
DIP). I reached out to Jonathan Davis and he agreed to make the 
revisions. He got the revised document to me just before DConf, 
so by the time I was ready to hand it back to Walter and Andrei 
after DConf, Atila was in the mix. None had any objections and 
here we are.

https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1013.md

Mike Parker <aldacron gmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 10 June 2019 at 13:49:27 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
 DIP 1013, "The Deprecation Process", has been accepted.

 After six months without a response from the DIP author, I 
 decided to move this DIP out f Post-Final and into Formal 
 Assessment rather than marking it as Abandoned. It's a simple 
 DIP and it was the last stage of the process, so it seemed a 
 waste not to go forward.

 Walter and Andrei were willing to accept the DIP with some 
 revisions (details in the review summary at the bottom of the 
 DIP). I reached out to Jonathan Davis and he agreed to make the 
 revisions. He got the revised document to me just before DConf, 
 so by the time I was ready to hand it back to Walter and Andrei 
 after DConf, Atila was in the mix. None had any objections and 
 here we are.

 https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1013.md

And after just posting about how I had forgotten to push a commit 
on another DIP, I forgot to push my final commit to this one. It 
now has a proper summary of the Formal Assessment.

Nicholas Wilson <iamthewilsonator hotmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 10 June 2019 at 13:49:27 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
 DIP 1013, "The Deprecation Process", has been accepted.
 ...
 https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1013.md

So what is the "version" in    DEPRECATED_[version]    supposed 
to be? That still seems to be ambiguous.

Jonathan M Davis <newsgroup.d jmdavisprog.com> writes:

On Wednesday, June 12, 2019 2:47:23 AM MDT Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-
d-announce wrote:
 On Monday, 10 June 2019 at 13:49:27 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
 DIP 1013, "The Deprecation Process", has been accepted.
 ...
 https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1013.md

 So what is the "version" in    DEPRECATED_[version]    supposed
 to be? That still seems to be ambiguous.

How is it ambiguous? It says right in the same sentence that
   DEPRECATED_[version]    is mentioned.

- Jonathan M Davis

Nicholas Wilson <iamthewilsonator hotmail.com> writes:

On Wednesday, 12 June 2019 at 11:40:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
 On Wednesday, June 12, 2019 2:47:23 AM MDT Nicholas Wilson via 
 Digitalmars- d-announce wrote:
 On Monday, 10 June 2019 at 13:49:27 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
 DIP 1013, "The Deprecation Process", has been accepted.
 ...
 https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1013.md

 So what is the "version" in    DEPRECATED_[version]    
 supposed to be? That still seems to be ambiguous.

 How is it ambiguous? It says right in the same sentence that 
    DEPRECATED_[version]    is mentioned.

 - Jonathan M Davis

Wow. Note to self, don't read post and sleep all at the same time.