digitalmars.D.announce - Beta D 2.075.1
- Martin Nowak (10/10) Aug 08 2017 First beta for the 2.075.1 point release.
- Vladimir Panteleev (2/4) Aug 08 2017 What's the problem with dman?
- Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d-announce (3/7) Aug 08 2017 https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17731
- Vladimir Panteleev (2/3) Aug 08 2017 Thanks. I've submitted a fix.
- Martin Nowak (6/9) Aug 08 2017 Thanks, considering
- Seb (5/15) Aug 09 2017 How about putting dman on DUB instead then? Acquiring the
- Ulrich =?UTF-8?B?S8O8dHRsZXI=?= (2/6) Aug 09 2017 dman is awesome! I did not use it because I did not know!
- Martin Nowak (13/19) Aug 10 2017 I guessed that would happen, doesn't resolve the name conflicts
- Vladimir Panteleev (6/9) Aug 10 2017 That would be a bug. It extends to the generated CHM's index as
- Walter Bright (7/10) Aug 10 2017 I use it all the time, because it gets me where I want to go from the co...
- Vladimir Panteleev (3/5) Aug 10 2017 This should be the case as of a few years. Is there anything
- Walter Bright (2/9) Aug 10 2017 No. Guess I haven't been keeping up!
- Walter Bright (2/11) Aug 10 2017 Just rename it to dmanual.
- aberba (3/16) Aug 11 2017 I've been wondering what dman was. I though it literally D Man.
First beta for the 2.075.1 point release. This version resolves a few regressions and bugs in the 2.075.0 release. This release does not ship with the dman tool due to an unresolved issue. Let us know whether and how you use that tool, so we can evaluate whether it's worth fixing. http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta http://dlang.org/changelog/2.075.1.html Please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org -Martin
Aug 08 2017
On Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 08:41:15 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:This release does not ship with the dman tool due to an unresolved issue.What's the problem with dman?
Aug 08 2017
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17731 On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce puremagic.com> wrote:On Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 08:41:15 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:This release does not ship with the dman tool due to an unresolved issue.What's the problem with dman?
Aug 08 2017
On Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 14:57:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17731Thanks. I've submitted a fix.
Aug 08 2017
On Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 15:45:45 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:On Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 14:57:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:Thanks, considering https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17569 I'd still say we should evaluate whether we want to continue maintaining and shipping a tool with unclear usefulness and userbase.https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17731Thanks. I've submitted a fix.
Aug 08 2017
On Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 20:32:34 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:On Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 15:45:45 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:How about putting dman on DUB instead then? Acquiring the d-man.json could be tricky, but if not done already, we could build it by default on dlang.org and then simply fetch it in the preBuildStepsOn Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 14:57:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:Thanks, considering https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17569 I'd still say we should evaluate whether we want to continue maintaining and shipping a tool with unclear usefulness and userbase.https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17731Thanks. I've submitted a fix.
Aug 09 2017
On Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 20:32:34 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:Thanks, considering https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17569 I'd still say we should evaluate whether we want to continue maintaining and shipping a tool with unclear usefulness and userbase.dman is awesome! I did not use it because I did not know!
Aug 09 2017
On Wednesday, 9 August 2017 at 15:35:12 UTC, Ulrich Küttler wrote:On Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 20:32:34 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:I guessed that would happen, doesn't resolve the name conflicts though. Does it provide enough value over the website search? Try dman 2.074.0, opens Also not a good replacement for DCD like docs-in-IDE integration. What about dman as dub package? For sure we could upload d.tag/d-tags.json to the website. While I personally find the tool nice, I never ended up using it much, because it requires you to know what you're searching for. No fuzzy search, no overview, etc. So in the end the search bar works much better for me.Thanks, considering https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17569 I'd still say we should evaluate whether we want to continue maintaining and shipping a tool with unclear usefulness and userbase.dman is awesome! I did not use it because I did not know!
Aug 10 2017
On Thursday, 10 August 2017 at 17:24:41 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:Try dman 2.074.0, opensThat would be a bug. It extends to the generated CHM's index as well, so we should fix it.So in the end the search bar works much better for me.If dman doesn't find the exact thing you're looking for, it falls back to a Google search, which is what the website search uses as well.
Aug 10 2017
On 8/10/2017 10:24 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:Does it provide enough value over the website search?I use it all the time, because it gets me where I want to go from the command line. Opening a browser, browsing to dlang.org, clickety-clicking around takes much longer. Worse, the site search rarely gets me where I want to go.While I personally find the tool nice, I never ended up using it much, because it requires you to know what you're searching for.It could use all of the runtime library functions added to the index, instead of just a smattering.
Aug 10 2017
On Thursday, 10 August 2017 at 20:15:12 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:It could use all of the runtime library functions added to the index, instead of just a smattering.This should be the case as of a few years. Is there anything missing specifically that you can point out?
Aug 10 2017
On 8/10/2017 6:03 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:On Thursday, 10 August 2017 at 20:15:12 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:No. Guess I haven't been keeping up!It could use all of the runtime library functions added to the index, instead of just a smattering.This should be the case as of a few years. Is there anything missing specifically that you can point out?
Aug 10 2017
On 8/8/2017 1:32 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:On Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 15:45:45 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:Just rename it to dmanual.On Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 14:57:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:Thanks, considering https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17569 I'd still say we should evaluate whether we want to continue maintaining and shipping a tool with unclear usefulness and userbase.https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17731Thanks. I've submitted a fix.
Aug 10 2017
On Thursday, 10 August 2017 at 20:18:50 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:On 8/8/2017 1:32 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:I've been wondering what dman was. I though it literally D Man. dmanual is the obvious name it should have.On Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 15:45:45 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:Just rename it to dmanual.On Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 14:57:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:Thanks, considering https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17569 I'd still say we should evaluate whether we want to continue maintaining and shipping a tool with unclear usefulness and userbase.https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17731Thanks. I've submitted a fix.
Aug 11 2017