digitalmars.D.announce - Beta 2.089.0
- Martin Nowak (7/7) Oct 16 2019 Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.089.0 release, ♥ to the 44
- Martin Nowak (2/9) Oct 24 2019
- Vladimir Panteleev (6/13) Oct 24 2019 Martin, DMD has been unbuildable from ZIP files for many releases
- baz (6/9) Oct 27 2019 Hi, I've tested my old stuff and found 2 regs.
- baz (2/13) Oct 27 2019 Only 20328 is valid actually.
- drug (4/20) Oct 27 2019 I confirm the bugs related to Nullable.get (I have another one). I have
- baz (10/32) Oct 27 2019 According to a little investigation the message would be caused
- baz (13/46) Oct 27 2019 BTW you're not allowed to do that
- FeepingCreature (8/57) Oct 28 2019 Yeah that's a non-fix. It's a blind replacement of "a" with
- FeepingCreature (6/16) Oct 28 2019 I take it back. Actually on looking into it deeper, while the
- Martin Nowak (2/9) Oct 27 2019 Release candidate is live now, website should get updated soon.
Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.089.0 release, ♥ to the 44 contributors. http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta http://dlang.org/changelog/2.089.0.html As usual please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org -Martin
Oct 16 2019
Martin Nowak <code dawg.eu> On Thursday, 17 October 2019 at 06:02:33 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.089.0 release, ♥ to the 44 contributors.Second beta is live now.http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta http://dlang.org/changelog/2.089.0.html As usual please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org -Martin
Oct 24 2019
On Thursday, 17 October 2019 at 06:02:33 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.089.0 release, ♥ to the 44 contributors. http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta http://dlang.org/changelog/2.089.0.html As usual please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org -MartinMartin, DMD has been unbuildable from ZIP files for many releases now. This has been reported to Bugzilla a while ago and has been asked about on the forum a few times. Could you please look into it? https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18791
Oct 24 2019
On Thursday, 17 October 2019 at 06:02:33 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:As usual please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org -MartinHi, I've tested my old stuff and found 2 regs. One deprecation in phobos due to Nullable.get and that was not detected and some weird linking errors, maybe due to typeinfo. https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20327 https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20328
Oct 27 2019
On Sunday, 27 October 2019 at 12:59:52 UTC, baz wrote:On Thursday, 17 October 2019 at 06:02:33 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:Only 20328 is valid actually.As usual please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org -MartinHi, I've tested my old stuff and found 2 regs. One deprecation in phobos due to Nullable.get and that was not detected and some weird linking errors, maybe due to typeinfo. https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20327 https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20328
Oct 27 2019
27.10.2019 17:20, baz пишет:On Sunday, 27 October 2019 at 12:59:52 UTC, baz wrote:I confirm the bugs related to Nullable.get (I have another one). I have no the reduced case but there are definitly issues with deprecated Nullable.getOn Thursday, 17 October 2019 at 06:02:33 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:Only 20328 is valid actually.As usual please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org -MartinHi, I've tested my old stuff and found 2 regs. One deprecation in phobos due to Nullable.get and that was not detected and some weird linking errors, maybe due to typeinfo. https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20327 https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20328
Oct 27 2019
On Sunday, 27 October 2019 at 15:04:34 UTC, drug wrote:27.10.2019 17:20, baz пишет:According to a little investigation the message would be caused by this unittest [1]. I would suggest to disable it (using version(none)) or to extract it from the struct to the global scope. It's not recommended to add unittest blocks in templatized types anyway, because when the test is not dependent on the template params, like here, it's always the same that gets executed for each instance. [1]: https://github.com/dlang/phobos/blob/master/std/typecons.d#L2889-L2897On Sunday, 27 October 2019 at 12:59:52 UTC, baz wrote:I confirm the bugs related to Nullable.get (I have another one). I have no the reduced case but there are definitly issues with deprecated Nullable.getOn Thursday, 17 October 2019 at 06:02:33 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:Only 20328 is valid actually.As usual please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org -MartinHi, I've tested my old stuff and found 2 regs. One deprecation in phobos due to Nullable.get and that was not detected and some weird linking errors, maybe due to typeinfo. https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20327 https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20328
Oct 27 2019
On Sunday, 27 October 2019 at 16:38:30 UTC, baz wrote:On Sunday, 27 October 2019 at 15:04:34 UTC, drug wrote:BTW you're not allowed to do that // Issue 19799 safe unittest { import std.format : format; const Nullable!string a = const(Nullable!string)(); format!"%s"(a.get); // added .get here } because the Nullable is in a null state, .get call crash the program in assert mode. Maybe you should revert the whole stuff ? What does the author of the deprecation think about this case ("feep" IIRC ) ?27.10.2019 17:20, baz пишет:According to a little investigation the message would be caused by this unittest [1]. I would suggest to disable it (using version(none)) or to extract it from the struct to the global scope. It's not recommended to add unittest blocks in templatized types anyway, because when the test is not dependent on the template params, like here, it's always the same that gets executed for each instance. [1]: https://github.com/dlang/phobos/blob/master/std/typecons.d#L2889-L2897On Sunday, 27 October 2019 at 12:59:52 UTC, baz wrote:I confirm the bugs related to Nullable.get (I have another one). I have no the reduced case but there are definitly issues with deprecated Nullable.getOn Thursday, 17 October 2019 at 06:02:33 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:Only 20328 is valid actually.As usual please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org -MartinHi, I've tested my old stuff and found 2 regs. One deprecation in phobos due to Nullable.get and that was not detected and some weird linking errors, maybe due to typeinfo. https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20327 https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20328
Oct 27 2019
On Sunday, 27 October 2019 at 16:50:00 UTC, baz wrote:On Sunday, 27 October 2019 at 16:38:30 UTC, baz wrote:Yeah that's a non-fix. It's a blind replacement of "a" with "a.get" that ignores the fact that Nullable!string has its own toString, ie. this is one of the cases where the `a.get` is actually not triggered at runtime. The fact that the deprecation still triggers is an issue with traits that has no clear and obvious solution. (I advocate Adam's approach of just disabling deprecations in traits outright.)On Sunday, 27 October 2019 at 15:04:34 UTC, drug wrote:BTW you're not allowed to do that // Issue 19799 safe unittest { import std.format : format; const Nullable!string a = const(Nullable!string)(); format!"%s"(a.get); // added .get here } because the Nullable is in a null state, .get call crash the program in assert mode. Maybe you should revert the whole stuff ? What does the author of the deprecation think about this case ("feep" IIRC ) ?27.10.2019 17:20, baz пишет:According to a little investigation the message would be caused by this unittest [1]. I would suggest to disable it (using version(none)) or to extract it from the struct to the global scope. It's not recommended to add unittest blocks in templatized types anyway, because when the test is not dependent on the template params, like here, it's always the same that gets executed for each instance. [1]: https://github.com/dlang/phobos/blob/master/std/typecons.d#L2889-L2897On Sunday, 27 October 2019 at 12:59:52 UTC, baz wrote:I confirm the bugs related to Nullable.get (I have another one). I have no the reduced case but there are definitly issues with deprecated Nullable.getOn Thursday, 17 October 2019 at 06:02:33 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:Only 20328 is valid actually.As usual please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org -MartinHi, I've tested my old stuff and found 2 regs. One deprecation in phobos due to Nullable.get and that was not detected and some weird linking errors, maybe due to typeinfo. https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20327 https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20328
Oct 28 2019
On Tuesday, 29 October 2019 at 06:06:56 UTC, FeepingCreature wrote:On Sunday, 27 October 2019 at 16:50:00 UTC, baz wrote:I take it back. Actually on looking into it deeper, while the general issue is gnarly, the solution to the *specific issue* in the bug report is very simple, lol. PR up: https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/7257What does the author of the deprecation think about this case ("feep" IIRC ) ?Yeah that's a non-fix. It's a blind replacement of "a" with "a.get" that ignores the fact that Nullable!string has its own toString, ie. this is one of the cases where the `a.get` is actually not triggered at runtime. The fact that the deprecation still triggers is an issue with traits that has no clear and obvious solution. (I advocate Adam's approach of just disabling deprecations in traits outright.)
Oct 28 2019
On Thursday, 17 October 2019 at 06:02:33 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.089.0 release, ♥ to the 44 contributors. http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta http://dlang.org/changelog/2.089.0.html As usual please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org -MartinRelease candidate is live now, website should get updated soon.
Oct 27 2019