• Walter (2/2) Jun 16 2005 Bugs fixed.
• Stewart Gordon (7/10) Jun 17 2005 "Fixed D.bugs/4249"
• Sean Kelly (4/10) Jun 17 2005 Perhaps recursive inheritance should not be allowed? I'm kind of confus...
• Walter (4/10) Jun 17 2005 I didn't think it was right or intuitive that A, A.A, A.A.A, A.A.A.A, et...
• Thomas Kuehne (10/22) Jun 18 2005 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
• Walter (5/23) Jun 18 2005 etc.,
• James Dunne (5/31) Jun 29 2005 "Operator Overloading" documentation still has === referred to ;) (just ...

"Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:

Bugs fixed.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

Stewart Gordon <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> writes:

Walter wrote:
 Bugs fixed.
 
 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

"Fixed D.bugs/4249"

In what respect was this a bug?

Stewart.

-- 
My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox.  Please keep replies on 
the 'group where everyone may benefit.

Sean Kelly <sean f4.ca> writes:

In article <d8u3rb$t88$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Stewart Gordon says...
Walter wrote:
 Bugs fixed.
 
 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

"Fixed D.bugs/4249"

In what respect was this a bug?

Perhaps recursive inheritance should not be allowed?  I'm kind of confused by
this one too.


Sean

"Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:

"Stewart Gordon" <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d8u3rb$t88$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Walter wrote:
 Bugs fixed.

 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

 "Fixed D.bugs/4249"

 In what respect was this a bug?

I didn't think it was right or intuitive that A, A.A, A.A.A, A.A.A.A, etc.,
were all the same thing.

Thomas Kuehne <thomas-dloop kuehne.this-is-spam.cn> writes:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Walter schrieb am Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:42:22 -0700:
 "Stewart Gordon" <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> wrote in message
 news:d8u3rb$t88$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Walter wrote:
 Bugs fixed.

 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

 "Fixed D.bugs/4249"

 In what respect was this a bug?

 I didn't think it was right or intuitive that A, A.A, A.A.A, A.A.A.A, etc.,
 were all the same thing.

Is this documented?

Thomas


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFCs8fa3w+/yD4P9tIRAnO+AJ92C15FNeQSk3fER9HGqt3rOkgZcACdF+Bq
HuxgC3fsGDBB3eAymIs7R/g=
=QBOr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

"Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:

"Thomas Kuehne" <thomas-dloop kuehne.this-is-spam.cn> wrote in message
news:qntco2-4k4.ln1 lnews.kuehne.cn...
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
 Hash: SHA1

 Walter schrieb am Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:42:22 -0700:
 "Stewart Gordon" <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> wrote in message
 news:d8u3rb$t88$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Walter wrote:
 Bugs fixed.

 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

 "Fixed D.bugs/4249"

 In what respect was this a bug?

 I didn't think it was right or intuitive that A, A.A, A.A.A, A.A.A.A,


etc.,
 were all the same thing.

 Is this documented?

Not sure, but I think it's implicit that A is not a part of A, and
furthermore, it servers no purpose to support A.A, A.A.A, etc.

James Dunne <james.jdunne gmail.com> writes:

"Operator Overloading" documentation still has === referred to ;) (just past
opCmp stuff)

In article <d91k96$oh9$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...
"Thomas Kuehne" <thomas-dloop kuehne.this-is-spam.cn> wrote in message
news:qntco2-4k4.ln1 lnews.kuehne.cn...
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
 Hash: SHA1

 Walter schrieb am Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:42:22 -0700:
 "Stewart Gordon" <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> wrote in message
 news:d8u3rb$t88$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Walter wrote:
 Bugs fixed.

 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

 "Fixed D.bugs/4249"

 In what respect was this a bug?

 I didn't think it was right or intuitive that A, A.A, A.A.A, A.A.A.A,


etc.,
 were all the same thing.

 Is this documented?

Not sure, but I think it's implicit that A is not a part of A, and
furthermore, it servers no purpose to support A.A, A.A.A, etc.

Regards,
James Dunne