digitalmars.D.announce - Digital Mars Website
- Trevor Parscal (18/18) Jun 06 2005 So anyhoo, I have offered before, but here it is again.
- Walter (3/8) Jun 06 2005 Why not take the D front page and do a mockup?
- Trevor Parscal (7/10) Jun 06 2005 Will do Walter!
- Trevor Parscal (20/34) Jun 08 2005 OK, I spent a bit of time on this, but there is more that could be done.
- Dave (5/39) Jun 08 2005 That is outstanding!!
- clayasaurus (2/43) Jun 08 2005
- Pablo Aguilar (3/22) Jun 08 2005 Looks great!
- Walter (6/20) Jun 08 2005 I think you've done a great job with this.
- Nod (6/31) Jun 08 2005 I think he means the PHP I used to create my mockup at
- Unknown W. Brackets (3/9) Jun 08 2005 Looks to me like the idea is to only show the table of contents when the...
- Nod (11/19) Jun 08 2005 Here you go, I have made it semi-understandable now, up from incomprehen...
- Trevor Parscal (9/14) Jun 08 2005 I am definately going to keep any css that is usefull.
- Hasan Aljudy (17/55) Jun 08 2005 Dude that is awesome! I love it!
- Trevor Parscal (20/26) Jun 08 2005 Agreed. I guess we should let walter reword it. I don't feel like I am
- Dejan Lekic (10/10) Jun 10 2005 Again, You're surprising me with Your design skills Trevor... :)
- Trevor Parscal (12/12) Jun 10 2005 Dejan!!!!
- Andrew Fedoniouk (6/24) Jun 06 2005 I did attempt sometime ago.
- David L. Davis (7/36) Jun 06 2005 Looks Nice! Very clean and modern looking, and good use of color.
- John Reimer (3/8) Jun 06 2005 Nice, Andrew. I like it.
- Andrew Fedoniouk (15/22) Jun 06 2005 Thanks, guys, it was just a quick scetch made at rest
- Walter (3/6) Jun 07 2005 I think you've got some good ideas there.
- Andrew Fedoniouk (4/10) Jun 07 2005 I hope you are speaking about the content of code block :)))
- Nod (4/22) Jun 06 2005 Hey, really nice work. I have already begun working on this though. Woul...
- Trevor Parscal (7/9) Jun 07 2005 Well, what have you got so far?
- Nod (14/18) Jun 07 2005 Yeah, that *would* be valuable info, wouldn't it :)
- Lars Ivar Igesund (10/36) Jun 07 2005 I think your design is nice, but now I noticed what I think is a problem
- J C Calvarese (13/38) Jun 07 2005 I agree, but we might need to do one thing at a time. ;)
- J C Calvarese (7/22) Jun 07 2005 Right, I looked at it in IE and the "Test of Boxes" didn't look quite th...
- Nod (10/14) Jun 07 2005 Thanks to both of you!
- Nod (6/12) Jun 07 2005 Yes, IE can be fixed, but it is nontrivial, so I won't spend time on it ...
- J C Calvarese (4/17) Jun 07 2005 Yes, I'd wait for some interest from Walter, too.
- Thomas Kuehne (10/22) Jun 06 2005 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
So anyhoo, I have offered before, but here it is again. Maybe D's site could use a little bit of graphical help. I would love to help out (for free of course), if Walter wants some help, otherwise, it's all good, just an offer. And if my crap sucks, than there would be no obligation to use it. Some sites I have done recently (as a consultant) www.house.gov/bean www.house.gov/costa www.techpaths.com and some for free (not professionally) www.clanillogic.com www.ey3dea.com So yeah, Walter, if you ever need a hand, let me know. -- Thanks, Trevor Parscal www.trevorparscal.com trevorparscal hotmail.com
Jun 06 2005
"Trevor Parscal" <trevorparscal hotmail.com> wrote in message news:d829rh$sd8$1 digitaldaemon.com...So anyhoo, I have offered before, but here it is again. Maybe D's site could use a little bit of graphical help. I would love to help out (for free of course), if Walter wants some help, otherwise, it's all good, just an offer. And if my crap sucks, than there would be no obligation to use it.Why not take the D front page and do a mockup?
Jun 06 2005
Walter wrote:Why not take the D front page and do a mockup?Will do Walter! -- Thanks, Trevor Parscal www.trevorparscal.com trevorparscal hotmail.com
Jun 06 2005
Walter wrote:"Trevor Parscal" <trevorparscal hotmail.com> wrote in message news:d829rh$sd8$1 digitaldaemon.com...OK, I spent a bit of time on this, but there is more that could be done. I showed the site as having an actual "home" page, which would be a slight change from how it is now. Also I intend on keeping the frames for the language documentation and comparison pages, but other stuff would be on normal site pages. (or so the concept goes).. You could keep it all in frames, but I really think frames have their place, and a download page isn't one of them. There is so much I could do to help lay the site's actual content out in an easier to use, more accessible, and more aesthetic manner. You can start to see what I mean by this image I hope. Anyhoo, I would love to work with the PHP that is already in existence for this effort. Hope you guys like it, and if you don't let me know what you dislike in as detailed manner as possible. -- Thanks, Trevor Parscal www.trevorparscal.com trevorparscal hotmail.comSo anyhoo, I have offered before, but here it is again. Maybe D's site could use a little bit of graphical help. I would love to help out (for free of course), if Walter wants some help, otherwise, it's all good, just an offer. And if my crap sucks, than there would be no obligation to use it.Why not take the D front page and do a mockup?
Jun 08 2005
That is outstanding!! - Dave "Trevor Parscal" <trevorparscal hotmail.com> wrote in message news:d86s7d$1qnd$1 digitaldaemon.com...Walter wrote:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------"Trevor Parscal" <trevorparscal hotmail.com> wrote in message news:d829rh$sd8$1 digitaldaemon.com...OK, I spent a bit of time on this, but there is more that could be done. I showed the site as having an actual "home" page, which would be a slight change from how it is now. Also I intend on keeping the frames for the language documentation and comparison pages, but other stuff would be on normal site pages. (or so the concept goes).. You could keep it all in frames, but I really think frames have their place, and a download page isn't one of them. There is so much I could do to help lay the site's actual content out in an easier to use, more accessible, and more aesthetic manner. You can start to see what I mean by this image I hope. Anyhoo, I would love to work with the PHP that is already in existence for this effort. Hope you guys like it, and if you don't let me know what you dislike in as detailed manner as possible. -- Thanks, Trevor Parscal www.trevorparscal.com trevorparscal hotmail.comSo anyhoo, I have offered before, but here it is again. Maybe D's site could use a little bit of graphical help. I would love to help out (for free of course), if Walter wants some help, otherwise, it's all good, just an offer. And if my crap sucks, than there would be no obligation to use it.Why not take the D front page and do a mockup?
Jun 08 2005
I like it. Very clean and professional looking. Trevor Parscal wrote:Walter wrote:"Trevor Parscal" <trevorparscal hotmail.com> wrote in message news:d829rh$sd8$1 digitaldaemon.com...OK, I spent a bit of time on this, but there is more that could be done. I showed the site as having an actual "home" page, which would be a slight change from how it is now. Also I intend on keeping the frames for the language documentation and comparison pages, but other stuff would be on normal site pages. (or so the concept goes).. You could keep it all in frames, but I really think frames have their place, and a download page isn't one of them. There is so much I could do to help lay the site's actual content out in an easier to use, more accessible, and more aesthetic manner. You can start to see what I mean by this image I hope. Anyhoo, I would love to work with the PHP that is already in existence for this effort. Hope you guys like it, and if you don't let me know what you dislike in as detailed manner as possible. ------------------------------------------------------------------------So anyhoo, I have offered before, but here it is again. Maybe D's site could use a little bit of graphical help. I would love to help out (for free of course), if Walter wants some help, otherwise, it's all good, just an offer. And if my crap sucks, than there would be no obligation to use it.Why not take the D front page and do a mockup?
Jun 08 2005
Looks great! "Trevor Parscal" <trevorparscal hotmail.com> wrote in message news:d86s7d$1qnd$1 digitaldaemon.com...OK, I spent a bit of time on this, but there is more that could be done. I showed the site as having an actual "home" page, which would be a slight change from how it is now. Also I intend on keeping the frames for the language documentation and comparison pages, but other stuff would be on normal site pages. (or so the concept goes).. You could keep it all in frames, but I really think frames have their place, and a download page isn't one of them. There is so much I could do to help lay the site's actual content out in an easier to use, more accessible, and more aesthetic manner. You can start to see what I mean by this image I hope. Anyhoo, I would love to work with the PHP that is already in existence for this effort. Hope you guys like it, and if you don't let me know what you dislike in as detailed manner as possible. -- Thanks, Trevor Parscal www.trevorparscal.com trevorparscal hotmail.com
Jun 08 2005
"Trevor Parscal" <trevorparscal hotmail.com> wrote in message news:d86s7d$1qnd$1 digitaldaemon.com...OK, I spent a bit of time on this, but there is more that could be done. I showed the site as having an actual "home" page, which would be a slight change from how it is now. Also I intend on keeping the frames for the language documentation and comparison pages, but other stuff would be on normal site pages. (or so the concept goes).. You could keep it all in frames, but I really think frames have their place, and a download page isn't one of them. There is so much I could do to help lay the site's actual content out in an easier to use, more accessible, and more aesthetic manner. You can start to see what I mean by this image I hope. Anyhoo, I would love to work with the PHP that is already in existence for this effort. Hope you guys like it, and if you don't let me know what you dislike in as detailed manner as possible.I think you've done a great job with this. I agree with abandoning the use of frames, but I'd still like to see the Table of Contents on the left for each page, including the 'home' page. What is the PHP already in existence? The D web site doesn't use PHP.
Jun 08 2005
In article <d87fs1$2dv3$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says..."Trevor Parscal" <trevorparscal hotmail.com> wrote in message news:d86s7d$1qnd$1 digitaldaemon.com...I think he means the PHP I used to create my mockup at http://nod.yi.org/d And of course, Trevor, you'll have it. Let me just nicen it up a little.. Maybe add a comment or two. And nice work! -Nod-OK, I spent a bit of time on this, but there is more that could be done. I showed the site as having an actual "home" page, which would be a slight change from how it is now. Also I intend on keeping the frames for the language documentation and comparison pages, but other stuff would be on normal site pages. (or so the concept goes).. You could keep it all in frames, but I really think frames have their place, and a download page isn't one of them. There is so much I could do to help lay the site's actual content out in an easier to use, more accessible, and more aesthetic manner. You can start to see what I mean by this image I hope. Anyhoo, I would love to work with the PHP that is already in existence for this effort. Hope you guys like it, and if you don't let me know what you dislike in as detailed manner as possible.I think you've done a great job with this. I agree with abandoning the use of frames, but I'd still like to see the Table of Contents on the left for each page, including the 'home' page. What is the PHP already in existence? The D web site doesn't use PHP.
Jun 08 2005
Looks to me like the idea is to only show the table of contents when the "language" item is selected (but I'm just guessing.) -[Unknown]I think you've done a great job with this. I agree with abandoning the use of frames, but I'd still like to see the Table of Contents on the left for each page, including the 'home' page. What is the PHP already in existence? The D web site doesn't use PHP.
Jun 08 2005
In article <d86s7d$1qnd$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Trevor Parscal says...Here you go, I have made it semi-understandable now, up from incomprehensible :) http://nod.yi.org/d/d.tar.bz2 The script fetch5.pl is what I used to pull the pages a while back, It should still work, if Walter has not changed too much in the toc.<snip>Anyhoo, I would love to work with the PHP that is already in existence for this effort.Hope you guys like it, and if you don't let me know what you dislike in as detailed manner as possible.I like it very much, only a minor thing: The language reference is a very large part of the site, so I think it should have a bit more prominent place on the frontpage. Oh, and do you think it is possible to use some of the graphics / css from my design for the reference? I'm kinda proud of some of the boxes...-- Thanks, Trevor Parscalz-Nod-
Jun 08 2005
Nod wrote:*snipt * Here you go, I have made it semi-understandable now, up from incomprehensible :) http://nod.yi.org/d/d.tar.bz2Thanks, that should help me out timewise, ALLOT!Oh, and do you think it is possible to use some of the graphics / css from my design for the reference? I'm kinda proud of some of the boxes...I am definately going to keep any css that is usefull. Why reinvent the wheel when you can make the wheel rounder instead? -- Thanks, Trevor Parscal www.trevorparscal.com trevorparscal hotmail.com
Jun 08 2005
Dude that is awesome! I love it! Where/How did you learn this stuff? as for crits: 1- This one is not about your design, but rather about the content (text). The site looks professional now, it kinda feels weird when the text says "I did .. I was told .. I .. I .." etc. You know what I mean? It's also not very cear who "I" refers to. 2- As Nod pointed out, the main purpos of the site was the language reference. ".. so I think it should have a bit more prominent place on the frontpage." I'm thinking the table of content for the language should always be there, or atleast the "Home" section should be the "Language Reference" section .. or something like that. But then again, who am I telling you how to design the site, I suck at this stuff. Anyway, you've done a good job. Trevor Parscal wrote:Walter wrote:"Trevor Parscal" <trevorparscal hotmail.com> wrote in message news:d829rh$sd8$1 digitaldaemon.com...OK, I spent a bit of time on this, but there is more that could be done. I showed the site as having an actual "home" page, which would be a slight change from how it is now. Also I intend on keeping the frames for the language documentation and comparison pages, but other stuff would be on normal site pages. (or so the concept goes).. You could keep it all in frames, but I really think frames have their place, and a download page isn't one of them. There is so much I could do to help lay the site's actual content out in an easier to use, more accessible, and more aesthetic manner. You can start to see what I mean by this image I hope. Anyhoo, I would love to work with the PHP that is already in existence for this effort. Hope you guys like it, and if you don't let me know what you dislike in as detailed manner as possible.So anyhoo, I have offered before, but here it is again. Maybe D's site could use a little bit of graphical help. I would love to help out (for free of course), if Walter wants some help, otherwise, it's all good, just an offer. And if my crap sucks, than there would be no obligation to use it.Why not take the D front page and do a mockup?
Jun 08 2005
Hasan Aljudy wrote:*snip* it kinda feels weird when the text says "I did .. I was told .. I .. I .." etc. You know what I mean? It's also not very cear who "I" refers to.Agreed. I guess we should let walter reword it. I don't feel like I am in the place, personally, to put words in walter's mouth, so I just left the text as is for the example.*snip* I think it should have a bit more prominent place on the frontpage."Agreed, I diddn't really think about that when I first made it, but than again, while the language refrence is the most important part of the site, other things in the site are a little too burried in my opinion. For instance, downloading the compiler, news about what's up with the latest version, and links to D related sites. These are all important for people who are a little newer. Eventually I would love to build Walter a language refrence system that is better than MSDN, but I will take one step at a time.Anyway, you've done a good job.Thanks man, I appriciate all the compliments from all of you. I love this comunity because they are really supportive, but still offer good ideas when they have them. -- Thanks, Trevor Parscal www.trevorparscal.com trevorparscal hotmail.com
Jun 08 2005
Again, You're surprising me with Your design skills Trevor... :) This is awesome! - I think Walter should immediately use this design for DigitalMars. In fact I think he should let you do the job for whole DM website if You wish... Walter? -- ........... Dejan Lekic http://dejan.lekic.org
Jun 10 2005
Dejan!!!! Good to hear from you. Made me want to get back on IRC.. See you there.. And.. If walter wants me to do more, I would suspect he knows my email address... | \ / v -- Thanks, Trevor Parscal www.trevorparscal.com trevorparscal hotmail.com
Jun 10 2005
I did attempt sometime ago. http://terrainformatica.com/harmonia/screenshots/dm.htm just as possible color gamma solution and probably composition. Andrew. "Trevor Parscal" <trevorparscal hotmail.com> wrote in message news:d829rh$sd8$1 digitaldaemon.com...So anyhoo, I have offered before, but here it is again. Maybe D's site could use a little bit of graphical help. I would love to help out (for free of course), if Walter wants some help, otherwise, it's all good, just an offer. And if my crap sucks, than there would be no obligation to use it. Some sites I have done recently (as a consultant) www.house.gov/bean www.house.gov/costa www.techpaths.com and some for free (not professionally) www.clanillogic.com www.ey3dea.com So yeah, Walter, if you ever need a hand, let me know. -- Thanks, Trevor Parscal www.trevorparscal.com trevorparscal hotmail.com
Jun 06 2005
In article <d835q4$1h9u$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Andrew Fedoniouk says...I did attempt sometime ago. http://terrainformatica.com/harmonia/screenshots/dm.htm just as possible color gamma solution and probably composition. Andrew. "Trevor Parscal" <trevorparscal hotmail.com> wrote in message news:d829rh$sd8$1 digitaldaemon.com...Looks Nice! Very clean and modern looking, and good use of color. David L. ------------------------------------------------------------------- "Dare to reach for the Stars...Dare to Dream, Build, and Achieve!" ------------------------------------------------------------------- MKoD: http://spottedtiger.tripod.com/D_Language/D_Main_XP.htmlSo anyhoo, I have offered before, but here it is again. Maybe D's site could use a little bit of graphical help. I would love to help out (for free of course), if Walter wants some help, otherwise, it's all good, just an offer. And if my crap sucks, than there would be no obligation to use it. Some sites I have done recently (as a consultant) www.house.gov/bean www.house.gov/costa www.techpaths.com and some for free (not professionally) www.clanillogic.com www.ey3dea.com So yeah, Walter, if you ever need a hand, let me know. -- Thanks, Trevor Parscal www.trevorparscal.com trevorparscal hotmail.com
Jun 06 2005
Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:I did attempt sometime ago. http://terrainformatica.com/harmonia/screenshots/dm.htm just as possible color gamma solution and probably composition. Andrew.Nice, Andrew. I like it. -JJR
Jun 06 2005
"John Reimer" <brk_6502 yahoo.com> wrote in message news:d83926$1kb7$1 digitaldaemon.com...Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:Thanks, guys, it was just a quick scetch made at rest time. I am not a professional designer but I do have art education. And this cannot be considered as something finished. Just visual thoughts. I think that Trevor will do this way better and more professionally than me. (I am using tenth rule of management here :-) For programmers who are looking for color combinations for their sites I would recommend this link: http://www.colormatch.dk/ Tool is not perfect but allows to select harmonised (of course!) colors - thus to avoid "christmas tree style". Andrew.I did attempt sometime ago. http://terrainformatica.com/harmonia/screenshots/dm.htm just as possible color gamma solution and probably composition. Andrew.Nice, Andrew. I like it.
Jun 06 2005
"Andrew Fedoniouk" <news terrainformatica.com> wrote in message news:d835q4$1h9u$1 digitaldaemon.com...I did attempt sometime ago. http://terrainformatica.com/harmonia/screenshots/dm.htm just as possible color gamma solution and probably composition.I think you've got some good ideas there.
Jun 07 2005
"Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:d83o15$211p$1 digitaldaemon.com..."Andrew Fedoniouk" <news terrainformatica.com> wrote in message news:d835q4$1h9u$1 digitaldaemon.com...I hope you are speaking about the content of code block :))) Andrew.I did attempt sometime ago. http://terrainformatica.com/harmonia/screenshots/dm.htm just as possible color gamma solution and probably composition.I think you've got some good ideas there.
Jun 07 2005
In article <d829rh$sd8$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Trevor Parscal says...So anyhoo, I have offered before, but here it is again. Maybe D's site could use a little bit of graphical help. I would love to help out (for free of course), if Walter wants some help, otherwise, it's all good, just an offer. And if my crap sucks, than there would be no obligation to use it. Some sites I have done recently (as a consultant) www.house.gov/bean www.house.gov/costa www.techpaths.com and some for free (not professionally) www.clanillogic.com www.ey3dea.com So yeah, Walter, if you ever need a hand, let me know. -- Thanks, Trevor Parscal www.trevorparscal.com trevorparscal hotmail.comHey, really nice work. I have already begun working on this though. Would you like to team up to avoid duplication of effort? -Nod-
Jun 06 2005
Nod wrote:Hey, really nice work. I have already begun working on this though. Would you like to team up to avoid duplication of effort?Well, what have you got so far? -- Thanks, Trevor Parscal www.trevorparscal.com trevorparscal hotmail.com
Jun 07 2005
In article <d83pol$2220$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Trevor Parscal says...Nod wrote:Yeah, that *would* be valuable info, wouldn't it :) Heh sorry, I was going to follow up with that earlier, but ran into some apache/php issues. I think I got it sorted now though. Check out -> http://nod.yi.org/d/ Some notes: * I have only tested it in the latest Firefox/Opera on Linux; hence it most probably won't look right in IE. * It's driven by php, so most links in the toc works. None of the in-page links work though. * Some pages are badly borked; notably compiler/phobos pages. Their html needs fixing. * Search doesn't work. -Nod-Hey, really nice work. I have already begun working on this though. Would you like to team up to avoid duplication of effort?Well, what have you got so far?
Jun 07 2005
Nod wrote:In article <d83pol$2220$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Trevor Parscal says...I think your design is nice, but now I noticed what I think is a problem with the original design: All the first links down the left are language reference stuff. This should be collected into one section of the site. Thus examples, comparisons, community (very important!) and other sections could get more attention/profilation. In my browser, none of these other sections are on the visible top part of the page. If I didn't scroll, I would never know that there is more to the page than the language reference. Lars Ivar IgesundNod wrote:Yeah, that *would* be valuable info, wouldn't it :) Heh sorry, I was going to follow up with that earlier, but ran into some apache/php issues. I think I got it sorted now though. Check out -> http://nod.yi.org/d/ Some notes: * I have only tested it in the latest Firefox/Opera on Linux; hence it most probably won't look right in IE. * It's driven by php, so most links in the toc works. None of the in-page links work though. * Some pages are badly borked; notably compiler/phobos pages. Their html needs fixing. * Search doesn't work. -Nod-Hey, really nice work. I have already begun working on this though. Would you like to team up to avoid duplication of effort?Well, what have you got so far?
Jun 07 2005
In article <d845mv$2c7b$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Lars Ivar Igesund says...Nod wrote:..In article <d83pol$2220$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Trevor Parscal says...Nod wrote:Yeah, that *would* be valuable info, wouldn't it :) Heh sorry, I was going to follow up with that earlier, but ran into some apache/php issues. I think I got it sorted now though. Check out -> http://nod.yi.org/d/Hey, really nice work. I have already begun working on this though. Would you like to team up to avoid duplication of effort?Well, what have you got so far?I think your design is nice, but now I noticed what I think is a problem with the original design: All the first links down the left are language reference stuff. This should be collected into one section of the site.I agree, but we might need to do one thing at a time. ;) I think he's trying to concentrate on solving the problem of the current webpage's understated style (which I think Nod's design does nicely). If someone can find some nice CSS that Walter will apply to the docs, that'd be a great improvement.Thus examples, comparisons, community (very important!) and other sections could get more attention/profilation. In my browser, none of these other sections are on the visible top part of the page. If I didn't scroll, I would never know that there is more to the page than the language reference. Lars Ivar IgesundI've thought the same thing. Maybe if one of us does a mock-up showing how we can add in a lead-in page to the frames or redesign it so that the frames are removed, we might be able to get such a change implemented. (I've been looking into doing something like this myself, but I haven't put too much time into it yet, and I haven't be satisfied with my results yet.) jcc7
Jun 07 2005
In article <d843q6$2amm$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Nod says...In article <d83pol$2220$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Trevor Parscal says...Cool! I like it.Nod wrote:Yeah, that *would* be valuable info, wouldn't it :) Heh sorry, I was going to follow up with that earlier, but ran into some apache/php issues. I think I got it sorted now though. Check out -> http://nod.yi.org/d/Hey, really nice work. I have already begun working on this though. Would you like to team up to avoid duplication of effort?Well, what have you got so far?Some notes: * I have only tested it in the latest Firefox/Opera on Linux; hence it most probably won't look right in IE.Right, I looked at it in IE and the "Test of Boxes" didn't look quite the same. Also the "DMD D Compiler" page, didn't work right in IE either (the graphics started overlapping some of the test). But I'm sure some .css can be developed that works well enough in all of the major browsers. jcc7
Jun 07 2005
In article <d845mv$2c7b$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Lars Ivar Igesund says...In article <d84ch1$2i83$1 digitaldaemon.com>, J C Calvarese says...<snip>I think your design is nice [...]Thanks to both of you! And it is correct that I am trying to focus style rather than content. The current pages actually have very clean html, so other than swapping the headers and footers using php, all that is really added is a css file and some graphics. The original content is almost totally unchanged. I must give Walter praise for this; I rarely see so nice html, even if it is not entirely validated - I don't care :) -Nod-<snip>Cool! I like it.
Jun 07 2005
In article <d84ch1$2i83$1 digitaldaemon.com>, J C Calvarese says...Yes, IE can be fixed, but it is nontrivial, so I won't spend time on it until I know the design will actually be used. Speaking of which, although it is not complete, some comments or suggestions from Walter would be nice :) -Nod-<snip>Right, I looked at it in IE and the "Test of Boxes" didn't look quite the same. Also the "DMD D Compiler" page, didn't work right in IE either (the graphics started overlapping some of the test). But I'm sure some .css can be developed that works well enough in all of the major browsers. jcc7
Jun 07 2005
In article <d853dv$5nh$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Nod says...In article <d84ch1$2i83$1 digitaldaemon.com>, J C Calvarese says...It's too bad Microsoft won't get with the program with web standards.Yes, IE can be fixed, but it is nontrivial, so I won't spend time on it until I know the design will actually be used.<snip>Right, I looked at it in IE and the "Test of Boxes" didn't look quite the same. Also the "DMD D Compiler" page, didn't work right in IE either (the graphics started overlapping some of the test). But I'm sure some .css can be developed that works well enough in all of the major browsers. jcc7Speaking of which, although it is not complete, some comments or suggestions from Walter would be nice :) -Nod-Yes, I'd wait for some interest from Walter, too. jcc7
Jun 07 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Trevor Parscal schrieb am Mon, 06 Jun 2005 12:57:33 -0700:So anyhoo, I have offered before, but here it is again. Maybe D's site could use a little bit of graphical help. I would love to help out (for free of course), if Walter wants some help, otherwise, it's all good, just an offer. And if my crap sucks, than there would be no obligation to use it. Some sites I have done recently (as a consultant) www.house.gov/bean www.house.gov/costa www.techpaths.com and some for free (not professionally) www.clanillogic.com www.ey3dea.comNice, only nitpick: where are the image-alt tags? Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFCpSpM3w+/yD4P9tIRApYXAJ0dUeQQaLqN6VIam7DQbkw5pHgmjgCgmmnL pg3DTZ1jkreRsJkHAAkWxv8= =IsXj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Jun 06 2005