digitalmars.D.announce - Build v2.00
- Derek Parnell (13/13) Apr 07 2005 The Build utility has reached a level of stability that I'm now calling ...
- jicman (9/11) Apr 07 2005 Here is the output that I get when I run build:
- Derek Parnell (11/25) Apr 07 2005 No it wasn't correct. I compiled the executable before I updated the
- jicman (6/27) Apr 07 2005 My friend, I wouldn't call it lazy. You are a great time saver. You do...
- clayasaurus (14/27) Apr 08 2005 Nice, though I myself do not need so much extra functionality!
- Derek Parnell (10/41) Apr 08 2005 Well, if it ever gets to be a problem I'll consider that. Currently, to ...
- jicman (2/39) Apr 08 2005 That's funny... :-)
- clayasaurus (4/47) Apr 08 2005 Forgive my ignorance, but now that I think about it, a feature should
- Dejan Lekic (11/11) Apr 09 2005 Excellent!
- Andrew Fedoniouk (9/9) Apr 09 2005 To add import feature to be able to write
- zwang (13/26) Apr 10 2005 I can't seem to download the zip package from
- Brad Anderson (3/34) Apr 11 2005 Fixed. See main NG.
The Build utility has reached a level of stability that I'm now calling it version 2.00(.700) You can get it from http://www.dsource.org/projects/build/ The next major enhancements are expected to include ... ** support for macro preprocessors ** building multiple applications in one invocation. ** building multiple editions of an application in one invocation. -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?FrontPage 8/04/2005 12:23:00 PM
Apr 07 2005
Derek Parnell says...The Build utility has reached a level of stability that I'm now calling it version 2.00(.700)Here is the output that I get when I run build: 6:17:43.07>build Path and Version : d:\bin\build.exe v1.20(700) built on Fri Apr 8 11:43:17 2005 Is this correct? Since you called it version 2.00(.700), it does not look the same. Of course, versioning is not my strength. :-) Again, thanks for this utility! It has saved my typing life inmensely! josé
Apr 07 2005
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 04:16:41 +0000 (UTC), jicman wrote:Derek Parnell says...No it wasn't correct. I compiled the executable before I updated the version number. I've got the correct one uploaded now. The (.700) is just the internal build number for the application. It gets automatically updated whenever it generate a new executable for 'Build'.The Build utility has reached a level of stability that I'm now calling it version 2.00(.700)Here is the output that I get when I run build: 6:17:43.07>build Path and Version : d:\bin\build.exe v1.20(700) built on Fri Apr 8 11:43:17 2005 Is this correct? Since you called it version 2.00(.700), it does not look the same. Of course, versioning is not my strength. :-)Again, thanks for this utility! It has saved my typing life inmensely!You're welcome. However, I made it for selfish reasons - I'm lazy. ;-) -- Derek Melbourne, Australia 8/04/2005 2:29:50 PM
Apr 07 2005
jicman <jicman_member pathlink.com> Derek Parnell says...On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 04:16:41 +0000 (UTC), jicman wrote:Yep. Just downloaded it and it's now jicman approved. :-)Derek Parnell says...No it wasn't correct. I compiled the executable before I updated the version number. I've got the correct one uploaded now. The (.700) is just the internal build number for the application. It gets automatically updated whenever it generate a new executable for 'Build'.The Build utility has reached a level of stability that I'm now calling it version 2.00(.700)Here is the output that I get when I run build: 6:17:43.07>build Path and Version : d:\bin\build.exe v1.20(700) built on Fri Apr 8 11:43:17 2005 Is this correct? Since you called it version 2.00(.700), it does not look the same. Of course, versioning is not my strength. :-)My friend, I wouldn't call it lazy. You are a great time saver. You don't like to waste time typing lots of libraries when you could simply just write a program to do that job for you... yeah, that's it. ;-) jicAgain, thanks for this utility! It has saved my typing life inmensely!You're welcome. However, I made it for selfish reasons - I'm lazy. ;-)
Apr 07 2005
Derek Parnell wrote:The Build utility has reached a level of stability that I'm now calling it version 2.00(.700) You can get it from http://www.dsource.org/projects/build/ The next major enhancements are expected to include ... ** support for macro preprocessors ** building multiple applications in one invocation. ** building multiple editions of an application in one invocation.Nice, though I myself do not need so much extra functionality! Maybe you can do some versioning in the code so when you compile build you can choose which features you want and don't want, as I assume the more features the longer it takes to execute the dependency trees etc? maybe like... version(BUILD_BASIC) { ... basic version of build } version(BUILD_SWISSKNIFE) { ... supports all the neat build only things like macros's and others }
Apr 08 2005
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:42:03 -0400, clayasaurus wrote:Derek Parnell wrote:Well, if it ever gets to be a problem I'll consider that. Currently, to do a full compile of the Mango library takes about 2-3 seconds, the Phobos library about the same. So I don't think that providing the enhancements mentioned above is really going to add anymore than a few milliseconds to it. -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia 9/04/2005 6:41:23 AMThe Build utility has reached a level of stability that I'm now calling it version 2.00(.700) You can get it from http://www.dsource.org/projects/build/ The next major enhancements are expected to include ... ** support for macro preprocessors ** building multiple applications in one invocation. ** building multiple editions of an application in one invocation.Nice, though I myself do not need so much extra functionality! Maybe you can do some versioning in the code so when you compile build you can choose which features you want and don't want, as I assume the more features the longer it takes to execute the dependency trees etc? maybe like... version(BUILD_BASIC) { ... basic version of build } version(BUILD_SWISSKNIFE) { ... supports all the neat build only things like macros's and others }
Apr 08 2005
Derek Parnell says...On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:42:03 -0400, clayasaurus wrote:That's funny... :-)Derek Parnell wrote:Well, if it ever gets to be a problem I'll consider that. Currently, to do a full compile of the Mango library takes about 2-3 seconds, the Phobos library about the same. So I don't think that providing the enhancements mentioned above is really going to add anymore than a few milliseconds to it.The Build utility has reached a level of stability that I'm now calling it version 2.00(.700) You can get it from http://www.dsource.org/projects/build/ The next major enhancements are expected to include ... ** support for macro preprocessors ** building multiple applications in one invocation. ** building multiple editions of an application in one invocation.Nice, though I myself do not need so much extra functionality! Maybe you can do some versioning in the code so when you compile build you can choose which features you want and don't want, as I assume the more features the longer it takes to execute the dependency trees etc? maybe like... version(BUILD_BASIC) { ... basic version of build } version(BUILD_SWISSKNIFE) { ... supports all the neat build only things like macros's and others }
Apr 08 2005
Derek Parnell wrote:On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:42:03 -0400, clayasaurus wrote:Forgive my ignorance, but now that I think about it, a feature should only make build run slower if you decide to use it with the -feature switch? If yes, than I know upgrading won't hurt builds awesome performance :-)Derek Parnell wrote:Well, if it ever gets to be a problem I'll consider that. Currently, to do a full compile of the Mango library takes about 2-3 seconds, the Phobos library about the same. So I don't think that providing the enhancements mentioned above is really going to add anymore than a few milliseconds to it.The Build utility has reached a level of stability that I'm now calling it version 2.00(.700) You can get it from http://www.dsource.org/projects/build/ The next major enhancements are expected to include ... ** support for macro preprocessors ** building multiple applications in one invocation. ** building multiple editions of an application in one invocation.Nice, though I myself do not need so much extra functionality! Maybe you can do some versioning in the code so when you compile build you can choose which features you want and don't want, as I assume the more features the longer it takes to execute the dependency trees etc? maybe like... version(BUILD_BASIC) { ... basic version of build } version(BUILD_SWISSKNIFE) { ... supports all the neat build only things like macros's and others }
Apr 08 2005
Excellent! Mr. Parnell, build is realy a great project. I like Your coding style as well (no javaLikeMethodNames() ... :) I'll recommend build to my friends as well, that's for sure! Kind regards Dejan -- ........... Dejan Lekic http://dejan.lekic.org
Apr 09 2005
To add import feature to be able to write
something like this:
static ubyte[] myBinResource = import filename.ext;
Being preprocessed will generate
static ubyte[] myBinResource =
[
0x01, 0x02, .... // all other bytes from filename.ext
]
Huh?
Apr 09 2005
I can't seem to download the zip package from http://www.dsource.org/svn/projects/build/downloads/build_2.00.zip or http://www.dsource.org/svn/projects/build/downloads/build_win_2.00.exe. I'm using Firefox, and the error message is: <D:error> <C:error/> <m:human-readable errcode="160029"> Could not open the requested SVN filesystem </m:human-readable> </D:error> Is there any alternative link? Derek Parnell wrote:The Build utility has reached a level of stability that I'm now calling it version 2.00(.700) You can get it from http://www.dsource.org/projects/build/ The next major enhancements are expected to include ... ** support for macro preprocessors ** building multiple applications in one invocation. ** building multiple editions of an application in one invocation.
Apr 10 2005
Fixed. See main NG. BA zwang wrote:I can't seem to download the zip package from http://www.dsource.org/svn/projects/build/downloads/build_2.00.zip or http://www.dsource.org/svn/projects/build/downloads/build_win_2.00.exe. I'm using Firefox, and the error message is: <D:error> <C:error/> <m:human-readable errcode="160029"> Could not open the requested SVN filesystem </m:human-readable> </D:error> Is there any alternative link? Derek Parnell wrote:The Build utility has reached a level of stability that I'm now calling it version 2.00(.700) You can get it from http://www.dsource.org/projects/build/ The next major enhancements are expected to include ... ** support for macro preprocessors ** building multiple applications in one invocation. ** building multiple editions of an application in one invocation.
Apr 11 2005