digitalmars.D - '<' and '>' are "matching delimiters"?
- Mehrdad (3/3) Jun 29 2012 They are, according to the "Nesting Delimiters" table in:
- Jonathan M Davis (8/13) Jun 29 2012 When they're used in delimited strings. That's the whole point of that
- Mehrdad (4/18) Jun 29 2012 Ooooooooooh I didn't understand that. lol it seems so obvious
They are, according to the "Nesting Delimiters" table in: http://dlang.org/lex.html When exactly are they seen as nesting delimiters?
Jun 29 2012
On Saturday, June 30, 2012 07:05:04 Mehrdad wrote:They are, according to the "Nesting Delimiters" table in: http://dlang.org/lex.html When exactly are they seen as nesting delimiters?When they're used in delimited strings. That's the whole point of that section. The examples are q"(foo(xxx))" // "foo(xxx)" q"[foo{]" // "foo{" but they could have included something like q"<foo{>" // "foo{" - Jonathan M Davis
Jun 29 2012
On Saturday, 30 June 2012 at 05:32:31 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:On Saturday, June 30, 2012 07:05:04 Mehrdad wrote:Ooooooooooh I didn't understand that. lol it seems so obvious now. >_< Thanks!They are, according to the "Nesting Delimiters" table in: http://dlang.org/lex.html When exactly are they seen as nesting delimiters?When they're used in delimited strings. That's the whole point of that section. The examples are q"(foo(xxx))" // "foo(xxx)" q"[foo{]" // "foo{" but they could have included something like q"<foo{>" // "foo{" - Jonathan M Davis
Jun 29 2012