digitalmars.D - WinAPI grossly lacking in core.c.windows.windows
- Gor Gyolchanyan (5/5) May 12 2012 What are the plans to finish the WinAPI in druntime? It's grossly
- Walter Bright (2/4) May 12 2012 Pull requests for improvements are welcome!
- Gor Gyolchanyan (7/12) May 12 2012 I can make time to adjust the binding from dsource.org bindings project ...
- Gor Gyolchanyan (8/13) May 12 2012 Also there are severe problems with the libs, distributed with DMD. They...
- Walter Bright (2/14) May 12 2012
- Paulo Pinto (3/7) May 13 2012 Is core.sys.windows.windows the right module for it?
- Jonathan M Davis (7/17) May 13 2012 No. The C OS function declarations go in druntime. The same goes for all...
- Paulo Pinto (2/24) May 14 2012 Thanks for the clarification.
What are the plans to finish the WinAPI in druntime? It's grossly lacking at the moment. -- Bye, Gor Gyolchanyan.
May 12 2012
On 5/12/2012 4:47 AM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:What are the plans to finish the WinAPI in druntime? It's grossly lacking at the moment.Pull requests for improvements are welcome!
May 12 2012
Gor Gyolchanyan <gor.f.gyolchanyan gmail.com> I can make time to adjust the binding from dsource.org bindings project to druntime, but I need the requirements for druntime WinAPI. On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Walter Bright <newshound2 digitalmars.com>wrote:On 5/12/2012 4:47 AM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:-- Bye, Gor Gyolchanyan.What are the plans to finish the WinAPI in druntime? It's grossly lacking at the moment.Pull requests for improvements are welcome!
May 12 2012
Also there are severe problems with the libs, distributed with DMD. They're totally ancient! The d modules alone won't fix the problem. What are the legal and technical problems involved in updating the libs? On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Walter Bright <newshound2 digitalmars.com>wrote:On 5/12/2012 4:47 AM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:-- Bye, Gor Gyolchanyan.What are the plans to finish the WinAPI in druntime? It's grossly lacking at the moment.Pull requests for improvements are welcome!
May 12 2012
Those libraries are internally just trampolines, no code. Hence they can be
updated.
On 5/12/2012 11:31 AM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Also there are severe problems with the libs, distributed with DMD. They're
totally ancient! The d modules alone won't fix the problem.
What are the legal and technical problems involved in updating the libs?
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Walter Bright <newshound2 digitalmars.com
<mailto:newshound2 digitalmars.com>> wrote:
On 5/12/2012 4:47 AM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
What are the plans to finish the WinAPI in druntime? It's grossly
lacking at the moment.
Pull requests for improvements are welcome!
--
Bye,
Gor Gyolchanyan.
May 12 2012
Am 12.05.2012 20:26, schrieb Walter Bright:On 5/12/2012 4:47 AM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:Is core.sys.windows.windows the right module for it? Somehow I would expect for the code to live in phobos std.windows module.What are the plans to finish the WinAPI in druntime? It's grossly lacking at the moment.Pull requests for improvements are welcome!
May 13 2012
On Sunday, May 13, 2012 11:19:12 Paulo Pinto wrote:Am 12.05.2012 20:26, schrieb Walter Bright:No. The C OS function declarations go in druntime. The same goes for all of the POSIX functions as well as any other system functions specific to Linux, Mac OS X, or FreeBSD. Any Windows stuff in Phobos which uses Windows OS functions should be wrappping OS functions rather than simply being declarations for them. - Jonathan M DavisOn 5/12/2012 4:47 AM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:Is core.sys.windows.windows the right module for it? Somehow I would expect for the code to live in phobos std.windows module.What are the plans to finish the WinAPI in druntime? It's grossly lacking at the moment.Pull requests for improvements are welcome!
May 13 2012
On Sunday, 13 May 2012 at 09:33:18 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:On Sunday, May 13, 2012 11:19:12 Paulo Pinto wrote:Thanks for the clarification.Am 12.05.2012 20:26, schrieb Walter Bright:No. The C OS function declarations go in druntime. The same goes for all of the POSIX functions as well as any other system functions specific to Linux, Mac OS X, or FreeBSD. Any Windows stuff in Phobos which uses Windows OS functions should be wrappping OS functions rather than simply being declarations for them. - Jonathan M DavisOn 5/12/2012 4:47 AM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:Is core.sys.windows.windows the right module for it? Somehow I would expect for the code to live in phobos std.windows module.What are the plans to finish the WinAPI in druntime? It's grossly lacking at the moment.Pull requests for improvements are welcome!
May 14 2012