• Don (4/4) Nov 08 2010 If anyone would like to use the latest compiler release, but cannot
• Iain Buclaw (5/9) Nov 09 2010 Speaking for someone else, but one such bug that comes to mind is:
• div0 (8/12) Nov 09 2010 Well not a regression, but disallowing struct literals when structs have...

Don <nospam nospam.com> writes:

If anyone would like to use the latest compiler release, but cannot 
because of a compiler regression, please specify which bug is the 
blocker (and whether you are using D1 or D2).
I'll try to get any such compiler regressions fixed in the next release.

Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw ubuntu.com> writes:

== Quote from Don (nospam nospam.com)'s article
 If anyone would like to use the latest compiler release, but cannot
 because of a compiler regression, please specify which bug is the
 blocker (and whether you are using D1 or D2).
 I'll try to get any such compiler regressions fixed in the next release.

Speaking for someone else, but one such bug that comes to mind is:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5015

As far as I'm aware I think he's staying on 1.061 for the time being because of
it.

Regards.

div0 <div0 sourceforge.net> writes:

On 09/11/2010 02:01, Don wrote:
 If anyone would like to use the latest compiler release, but cannot
 because of a compiler regression, please specify which bug is the
 blocker (and whether you are using D1 or D2).
 I'll try to get any such compiler regressions fixed in the next release.

Well not a regression, but disallowing struct literals when structs have 
constructors has really ballsed up my code. Changing to using 
constructors doesn't work at the moment as you can't assign to array 
elements in CTFE.

-- 
My enormous talent is exceeded only by my outrageous laziness.
http://www.ssTk.co.uk