www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D - Wanted: Review manager for std.experimental.testing

reply "Atila Neves" <atila.neves gmail.com> writes:
Pretty sure I addressed all remaining comments.

Atila
Jul 27 2015
next sibling parent reply "Joakim =?UTF-8?B?QnLDpG5uc3Ryw7ZtIg==?= <notfornow dev.null.com> writes:
I'm looking forward to this addition. Good job.

Does unit-threaded (branch: experimental) contain the same as the 
pull request for std.experimental.testing?
I've only read about it (PR+forum) so far and dying of curiosity 
to test it out for real.

Questions.
Does it contain a way to plugin ones own "result writer"?
Remove/replace the current "console writer"?

//Joakim
Jul 27 2015
parent "Atila Neves" <atila.neves gmail.com> writes:
On Monday, 27 July 2015 at 14:59:48 UTC, Joakim Brännström wrote:

 I'm looking forward to this addition. Good job.

 Does unit-threaded (branch: experimental) contain the same as 
 the pull request for std.experimental.testing?


Pretty much.


 I've only read about it (PR+forum) so far and dying of 
 curiosity to test it out for real.


You can:

1) Use unit-threaded with dub and a "unittest" configuration. 
Most of the PR changes were cosmetic, it's basically the same 
thing.
2) Clone my phobos fork and use std.experimental.testing
3) Clone unit-threaded and use the "experimental" branch

Just beware that with 2.067 there's a crashing bug if you use it 
with "unittest" blocks. It's been fixed in the meanwhile, but if 
you don't use dmd HEAD then stick to test functions (which don't 
exist anymore in std.experimental.testing since there's no need 
for them anymore).


 Questions.
 Does it contain a way to plugin ones own "result writer"?


No, but it's a neat idea. I can see a demand for XML/HTML/JSON 
output for continuous integration.

Atila
Jul 27 2015
prev sibling parent "Robert burner Schadek" <rburners gmail.com> writes:
I will do the review management
Aug 17 2015