www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D - WAT ! Or nonsense that we should avoid in D.

reply deadalnix <deadalnix gmail.com> writes:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP5TLk4-rcY

This presentation is really funny, but also show us what we should in D.

I would add that D already have some of them and they really should be 
fixed. Anyone who doubt of this should try to assert an object. Unless 
you are crazy, it doesn't do what you think.
Jan 24 2012
next sibling parent reply "Vladimir Panteleev" <vladimir thecybershadow.net> writes:
On Tuesday, 24 January 2012 at 10:53:10 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP5TLk4-rcY

 This presentation is really funny, but also show us what we 
 should in D.
This was discussed a short time ago here: http://dfeed.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net/discussion/post/jfc1ts$2hck$1 digitalmars.com
 I would add that D already have some of them and they really 
 should be fixed. Anyone who doubt of this should try to assert 
 an object. Unless you are crazy, it doesn't do what you think.
This was fixed recently. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/358
Jan 24 2012
parent reply deadalnix <deadalnix gmail.com> writes:
Le 24/01/2012 12:08, Vladimir Panteleev a écrit :
 On Tuesday, 24 January 2012 at 10:53:10 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP5TLk4-rcY

 This presentation is really funny, but also show us what we should in D.
This was discussed a short time ago here: http://dfeed.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net/discussion/post/jfc1ts$2hck$1 digitalmars.com
Ha, I did noticed that. Sorry for the duplicate.
Jan 24 2012
parent "Nick Sabalausky" <a a.a> writes:
"deadalnix" <deadalnix gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:jfm7l2$eas$1 digitalmars.com...
 Le 24/01/2012 12:08, Vladimir Panteleev a écrit :
 On Tuesday, 24 January 2012 at 10:53:10 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP5TLk4-rcY

 This presentation is really funny, but also show us what we should in D.
This was discussed a short time ago here: http://dfeed.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net/discussion/post/jfc1ts$2hck$1 digitalmars.com
Ha, I did noticed that. Sorry for the duplicate.
Of all things to duplicate, this would certainly be the most worthy :)
Jan 24 2012
prev sibling parent Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw ubuntu.com> writes:
On 24 January 2012 10:54, deadalnix <deadalnix gmail.com> wrote:
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP5TLk4-rcY

 This presentation is really funny, but also show us what we should in D.

 I would add that D already have some of them and they really should be
 fixed. Anyone who doubt of this should try to assert an object. Unless you
 are crazy, it doesn't do what you think.
Someone posted this earlier last week. -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
Jan 24 2012