digitalmars.D - Variant[string] associative array ... fail?
- Eljay (29/29) Apr 04 2009 Hi everyone,
- Walter Bright (2/2) Apr 04 2009 Is it this one?
- Andrei Alexandrescu (8/42) Apr 04 2009 Hey Eljay, thanks for being around :o). It's good you raise scrutiny
- Eljay (5/13) Apr 04 2009 Thanks Andrei!
Hi everyone, This code works... ---------------------- import std.variant; import std.stdio; void main() { Variant v; v = "hello"; writeln(v); } ---------------------- But this code does not... ---------------------- import std.variant; import std.stdio; void main() { Variant[string] v; v["there"] = "hello"; writeln(v["there"]); } ---------------------- ...resulting in this runtime failure: core.exception.RangeError Var(6): Range violation What did I do wrong? Using Digital Mars D Compiler v2.027, on OS X 10.5.6. Thanks, --Eljay
Apr 04 2009
Is it this one? http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2451
Apr 04 2009
Eljay wrote:Hi everyone, This code works... ---------------------- import std.variant; import std.stdio; void main() { Variant v; v = "hello"; writeln(v); } ---------------------- But this code does not... ---------------------- import std.variant; import std.stdio; void main() { Variant[string] v; v["there"] = "hello"; writeln(v["there"]); } ---------------------- ...resulting in this runtime failure: core.exception.RangeError Var(6): Range violation What did I do wrong? Using Digital Mars D Compiler v2.027, on OS X 10.5.6. Thanks, --EljayHey Eljay, thanks for being around :o). It's good you raise scrutiny about the dynamic style of coding in D. The code is correct but subject to a compiler bug: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2451 I just voted that up (it's supposed to raise its informal importance), you may want to as well. Andrei
Apr 04 2009
Hey Eljay, thanks for being around :o). It's good you raise scrutiny about the dynamic style of coding in D. The code is correct but subject to a compiler bug: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2451 I just voted that up (it's supposed to raise its informal importance), you may want to as well.Thanks Andrei! I'll put in in my vote. :-) I'm relieved that my program is correct (as per my understanding of the documentation). And that the compiler bug will be fixed in due course -- I'm very patient. Sincerely, --Eljay
Apr 04 2009