• 4tuu4k002 sneakemail.com (136/136) Jan 31 2009 Hi
• Ellery Newcomer (3/142) Feb 01 2009 What about that !in operator? That wouldn't be difficult to include in
• Jarrett Billingsley (5/7) Feb 01 2009 It's been discussed to death. The problem is that 'in' currently

4tuu4k002 sneakemail.com writes:

Hi

This is the monthly status for the unofficial d wish list: 
http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/

Right now the wish list looks like this:

Ellery Newcomer <ellery-newcomer utulsa.edu> writes:

4tuu4k002 sneakemail.com wrote:
 Hi
 
 This is the monthly status for the unofficial d wish list: 
 http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/
 
 Right now the wish list looks like this:
 






































































































































What about that !in operator? That wouldn't be difficult to include in 
D2, would it?

Jarrett Billingsley <jarrett.billingsley gmail.com> writes:

On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Ellery Newcomer
<ellery-newcomer utulsa.edu> wrote:
 What about that !in operator? That wouldn't be difficult to include in D2,
 would it?

It's been discussed to death.  The problem is that 'in' currently
returns a pointer, and if !in returned a bool, it would be
incongruous.  Personally, I don't agree, but whatever.