• bearophile (7/7) Jun 13 2013 Found through Reddit. I think this mess should be avoided/fixed
• David Nadlinger (3/8) Jun 13 2013 Yes, we need a clear definition of pointer aliasing rules in D.

"bearophile" <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> writes:

Found through Reddit. I think this mess should be avoided/fixed 
in D:

http://blog.regehr.org/archives/959

I think D supports the type conversions with a union, like part 
of the C99 standard says.

Bye,
bearophile

"David Nadlinger" <code klickverbot.at> writes:

On Thursday, 13 June 2013 at 16:43:01 UTC, bearophile wrote:
 Found through Reddit. I think this mess should be avoided/fixed 
 in D:

 http://blog.regehr.org/archives/959

 I think D supports the type conversions with a union, like part 
 of the C99 standard says.

Yes, we need a clear definition of pointer aliasing rules in D.

David