• Joshua Niehus (9/9) May 23 2014 watching your talk was like witnessing Fermats last theorem being
• Timon Gehr (4/11) May 24 2014 Unfortunately, I missed the talk. Sounds promising (I'm using an
• =?UTF-8?B?QWxpIMOHZWhyZWxp?= (6/7) May 24 2014 deadalnix showed a piece of code that had a compilation error inside a
• Nick Sabalausky (2/8) May 24 2014 DAT DIAGNOSTIC! o_O
• deadalnix (7/26) May 25 2014 I think the talk will be available, but as it was the last one,
• Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d (5/9) May 25 2014 Once SDC is completed, that will likely be a huge leg-up over dmd, given...
• deadalnix (5/14) May 25 2014 Hi,
• deadalnix (4/13) May 25 2014 Also, while we are at it, thank to David Ellsworth, for his great

"Joshua Niehus" <jm.niehus gmail.com> writes:

watching your talk was like witnessing Fermats last theorem being 
proven...

the scheduler solution was brilliant and the semantic analysis of 
a mixin statement that resulted in a comprehensible error message 
blew my mind.

Here is a belated applause that should have happened during those 
slides.

Well done.

josh

Timon Gehr <timon.gehr gmx.ch> writes:

On 05/24/2014 05:03 AM, Joshua Niehus wrote:
 watching your talk was like witnessing Fermats last theorem being proven...

 the scheduler solution was brilliant and the semantic analysis of a
 mixin statement that resulted in a comprehensible error message blew my
 mind.

 Here is a belated applause that should have happened during those slides.

 Well done.

 josh

Unfortunately, I missed the talk. Sounds promising (I'm using an 
explicit scheduler component for semantic analysis as well.) What does 
comprehensible mixin error message mean exactly?

=?UTF-8?B?QWxpIMOHZWhyZWxp?= <acehreli yahoo.com> writes:

On 05/24/2014 03:58 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:

 What does comprehensible mixin error message mean exactly?

deadalnix showed a piece of code that had a compilation error inside a 
mixin string that was mixed in by another mixin. The compiler was 
pointing out the exact column of the mixed in error, as well as all the 
inclusion backtrace.

Ali

Nick Sabalausky <SeeWebsiteToContactMe semitwist.com> writes:

On 5/24/2014 10:41 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
 On 05/24/2014 03:58 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:

  > What does comprehensible mixin error message mean exactly?

 deadalnix showed a piece of code that had a compilation error inside a
 mixin string that was mixed in by another mixin. The compiler was
 pointing out the exact column of the mixed in error, as well as all the
 inclusion backtrace.

DAT DIAGNOSTIC!  o_O

"deadalnix" <deadalnix gmail.com> writes:

On Saturday, 24 May 2014 at 22:58:26 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
 On 05/24/2014 05:03 AM, Joshua Niehus wrote:
 watching your talk was like witnessing Fermats last theorem 
 being proven...

 the scheduler solution was brilliant and the semantic analysis 
 of a
 mixin statement that resulted in a comprehensible error 
 message blew my
 mind.

 Here is a belated applause that should have happened during 
 those slides.

 Well done.

 josh

 Unfortunately, I missed the talk. Sounds promising (I'm using 
 an explicit scheduler component for semantic analysis as well.) 
 What does comprehensible mixin error message mean exactly?

I think the talk will be available, but as it was the last one, 
probably in a long time :(

The mixin thing was an explanation of what the compiler does when 
it encounter error within mixins. Basically, it show the error 
message with the "mixed" in code, and show the mixin where that 
code come from.

Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d puremagic.com> writes:

On Sun, 25 May 2014 07:46:48 +0000
deadalnix via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d puremagic.com> wrote:

 The mixin thing was an explanation of what the compiler does when
 it encounter error within mixins. Basically, it show the error
 message with the "mixed" in code, and show the mixin where that
 code come from.

Once SDC is completed, that will likely be a huge leg-up over dmd, given how
poorly it handles those.

- Jonathan M Davis

"deadalnix" <deadalnix gmail.com> writes:

On Saturday, 24 May 2014 at 03:03:56 UTC, Joshua Niehus wrote:
 watching your talk was like witnessing Fermats last theorem 
 being proven...

 the scheduler solution was brilliant and the semantic analysis 
 of a mixin statement that resulted in a comprehensible error 
 message blew my mind.

 Here is a belated applause that should have happened during 
 those slides.

 Well done.

 josh

Hi,

I'm not sure how much this is a reference to the 'upworthy' slide 
and how much you were impressed, but whatever the ratio, thank 
you.

"deadalnix" <deadalnix gmail.com> writes:

On Saturday, 24 May 2014 at 03:03:56 UTC, Joshua Niehus wrote:
 watching your talk was like witnessing Fermats last theorem 
 being proven...

 the scheduler solution was brilliant and the semantic analysis 
 of a mixin statement that resulted in a comprehensible error 
 message blew my mind.

 Here is a belated applause that should have happened during 
 those slides.

 Well done.

 josh

Also, while we are at it, thank to David Ellsworth, for his great 
picture of Andrei. Now we will be able to advertise massively on 
the net (if you don't understand any of this, you'll know soon).