• w0rp (10/10) May 20 2014 I'm not going to DConf myself, but I'll make this thread so
• Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d (5/7) May 20 2014 It would be nice to solve this. There is *a ton* of const reference
• Manu via Digitalmars-d (6/15) May 20 2014 I'd really like that too.
• w0rp (3/8) May 20 2014 conferenceDiscussion(manusReferenceDiscussionFlag());

"w0rp" <devw0rp gmail.com> writes:

I'm not going to DConf myself, but I'll make this thread so 
people can list out a few things worth discussing while various 
important D contributors are all gathered together at DConf 2014.

During the last conference, people met up to discuss ref const(T) 
and references to r-values, etc. There was some feeling at the 
time of having a solution ready for the issue, and a lot of 
discussion afterwards, but the end result was that we ended up 
not having a solution in place a year later. Could this be 
brought up again? Is there a solution to be had at all? I hate to 
sound like I'm nagging, but I think it's worth talking about.

Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d puremagic.com> writes:

On 5/20/14, w0rp via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d puremagic.com> wrote:
 During the last conference, people met up to discuss ref const(T)
 and references to r-values, etc.

It would be nice to solve this. There is *a ton* of const reference
stuff in a typical C++ library. I always have to convert these into
pass-by-value, and my gut feeling is that performance suffers because
of this.

Manu via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d puremagic.com> writes:

On 21 May 2014 04:01, w0rp via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d puremagic.com> wrote:
 I'm not going to DConf myself, but I'll make this thread so people can list
 out a few things worth discussing while various important D contributors are
 all gathered together at DConf 2014.

 During the last conference, people met up to discuss ref const(T) and
 references to r-values, etc. There was some feeling at the time of having a
 solution ready for the issue, and a lot of discussion afterwards, but the
 end result was that we ended up not having a solution in place a year later.
 Could this be brought up again? Is there a solution to be had at all? I hate
 to sound like I'm nagging, but I think it's worth talking about.

I'd really like that too.
I was the main driving force behind that conversation last year, and
I'm not going this year :(
So someone else will have to carry the flag...?

"w0rp" <devw0rp gmail.com> writes:

On Tuesday, 20 May 2014 at 18:11:12 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d 
wrote:
 I'd really like that too.
 I was the main driving force behind that conversation last 
 year, and
 I'm not going this year :(
 So someone else will have to carry the flag...?

conferenceDiscussion(manusReferenceDiscussionFlag());