digitalmars.D - Thanks for putting up with me
- Trevor Parscal (10/10) Mar 05 2008 I was reading through some of the articles I posted on this group over t...
- Walter Bright (1/1) Mar 05 2008 All it means is you care about your craft, and that's good. No problem!
-
BCS
(3/37)
Mar 05 2008
It's nice to see such candor. I fear that I have just as many (if... - Saaa (1/1) Mar 06 2008 Just play nice Ty.
- Ty Tower (4/7) Mar 06 2008 I'm always nice if you are nice to me .What you send out is what you get...
- Lionello Lunesu (3/3) Mar 06 2008 Nooo! You should never re-read your old posts!
I was reading through some of the articles I posted on this group over the past few years, many written with an ignorant or at least not-yet-educated and quick to jump to rash conclusions perspective - and I must say, I was a little embarrassed. * I actually thought it was rediculous to use a single letter as a variable name. Now I do it often - like when calculating bezier curves for instance... * I really thought it was important to allow a package and a module to have the same name - now I just use package Module case. * I seriously thought it was crucial that phobos reorganize and change it's name. Now I just use tango. * I brought way to many bad C++ habits with me when i switched, and was to resistant to embrace the D style guide. * I thought too much in absolutes, and saw very little gray scale. Thus I once was bool and now am real. :) * I used the word ownedah (as in owned, see urban dictionary if you still don't get it) * I was probably annoying as hell. So, while I may still possess some of those traits from time to time, I feel I have come a very long way as a programmer, and thank you all for your patience with my antics. Even when I was probably irritating, no one ever made me feel unwelcome. I look forward to being a part of the D community for many more years to come. - Trevor Parscal
Mar 05 2008
All it means is you care about your craft, and that's good. No problem!
Mar 05 2008
Reply to Trevor,I was reading through some of the articles I posted on this group over the past few years, many written with an ignorant or at least not-yet-educated and quick to jump to rash conclusions perspective - and I must say, I was a little embarrassed. * I actually thought it was rediculous to use a single letter as a variable name. Now I do it often - like when calculating bezier curves for instance... * I really thought it was important to allow a package and a module to have the same name - now I just use package Module case. * I seriously thought it was crucial that phobos reorganize and change it's name. Now I just use tango. * I brought way to many bad C++ habits with me when i switched, and was to resistant to embrace the D style guide. * I thought too much in absolutes, and saw very little gray scale. Thus I once was bool and now am real. :) * I used the word ownedah (as in owned, see urban dictionary if you still don't get it) * I was probably annoying as hell. So, while I may still possess some of those traits from time to time, I feel I have come a very long way as a programmer, and thank you all for your patience with my antics. Even when I was probably irritating, no one ever made me feel unwelcome. I look forward to being a part of the D community for many more years to come. - Trevor Parscal<nod/> It's nice to see such candor. I fear that I have just as many (if not more) faults and am no where near as aware of them.
Mar 05 2008
Saaa Wrote:Just play nice Ty.I'm always nice if you are nice to me .What you send out is what you get back and I like your posts Sabrina isn't it ? I must go look that up. Seriously I'm being misjudged Sabrina . It takes a womans understanding to see through the clutter to the kernel of the issue. Ta Ta now , Sleep tight
Mar 06 2008
Nooo! You should never re-read your old posts! I know I always feel silly when I do :-S L.
Mar 06 2008