• John Kiro (34/34) Sep 07 2007 Hell There
• Don Clugston (5/42) Sep 09 2007 Yup. #1 and #4 are bugs. Put them into Bugzilla.
• John Kiro (4/46) Sep 09 2007 Thanks Don.. that would be my first bugs to report.. I'll check how to d...

John Kiro <johnkirollos yahoo.com> writes:

Hell There

I made the following example to see how far can inline asm blocks use template
args:
	========================================
	void asm_template(T)(T Tval,T* pDest)
	{
		asm{
			fld Tval;
			mov EAX,pDest;




		}//asm
	}//asm_template
		
	void main()
	{
	  float f1=4.0;
	  float f2=5.0;
	
	  asm_template!(float)(f1,&f2);
	}
	========================================
Here is the compilation result of the 4 statements marked above:






float". In other words, why would it fail if T is correctly interpreted to
float?

would be more natural).
In conclusion, I see that template args are partially (and unclearly) supported
inside ASM blocks. Me, I hope to have better support for aliases & template
args in ASM blocks.
What do you think friends?

Regards,
John

Don Clugston <dac nospam.com.au> writes:

John Kiro wrote:
 Hell There
 
 I made the following example to see how far can inline asm blocks use template
args:
 	========================================
 	void asm_template(T)(T Tval,T* pDest)
 	{
 		asm{
 			fld Tval;
 			mov EAX,pDest;




 		}//asm
 	}//asm_template
 		
 	void main()
 	{
 	  float f1=4.0;
 	  float f2=5.0;
 	
 	  asm_template!(float)(f1,&f2);
 	}
 	========================================
 Here is the compilation result of the 4 statements marked above:




 

float". In other words, why would it fail if T is correctly interpreted to
float?

would be more natural).
 In conclusion, I see that template args are partially (and unclearly)
supported inside ASM blocks. Me, I hope to have better support for aliases &
template args in ASM blocks.
 What do you think friends?
 
 Regards,
 John



is giving me a lot of grief at the moment. And in the last DMD, there's a new 
bad code generation bug with using tuple parameters from asm.

John Kiro <johnkirollos yahoo.com> writes:

Don Clugston Wrote:

 John Kiro wrote:
 Hell There
 
 I made the following example to see how far can inline asm blocks use template
args:
 	========================================
 	void asm_template(T)(T Tval,T* pDest)
 	{
 		asm{
 			fld Tval;
 			mov EAX,pDest;




 		}//asm
 	}//asm_template
 		
 	void main()
 	{
 	  float f1=4.0;
 	  float f2=5.0;
 	
 	  asm_template!(float)(f1,&f2);
 	}
 	========================================
 Here is the compilation result of the 4 statements marked above:




 

float". In other words, why would it fail if T is correctly interpreted to
float?

would be more natural).
 In conclusion, I see that template args are partially (and unclearly)
supported inside ASM blocks. Me, I hope to have better support for aliases &
template args in ASM blocks.
 What do you think friends?
 
 Regards,
 John



 is giving me a lot of grief at the moment. And in the last DMD, there's a new 
 bad code generation bug with using tuple parameters from asm.

Thanks Don.. that would be my first bugs to report.. I'll check how to do so.

Regards,
John