• Iain Buclaw (13/13) Oct 10 2013 As part of the front-end harmonising work I'm doing, will be
• David Nadlinger (8/12) Oct 17 2013 I can't speak for the other LDC devs, but I think this should be

"Iain Buclaw" <ibuclaw ubuntu.com> writes:

As part of the front-end harmonising work I'm doing, will be 
adding in a Target hook to handle compiler-specific pragmas.  
This would abstract out code like this in LDC.

https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/blob/master/dmd2/attrib.c#L1113
https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/blob/master/dmd2/attrib.c#L1182

Which implements these pragmas.

http://wiki.dlang.org/LDC-specific_language_changes#Pragmas


I have plans for adding in pragmas into GDC at a later date too 
as I plan to make the magic modules of GDC re-locatable 
(core.stdc.stdarg, gcc.builtins, etc...)


David, you OK with this? :-)


Regards
Iain.

"David Nadlinger" <code klickverbot.at> writes:

On Thursday, 10 October 2013 at 12:39:00 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
 As part of the front-end harmonising work I'm doing, will be 
 adding in a Target hook to handle compiler-specific pragmas.  
 […]
 David, you OK with this? :-)

I can't speak for the other LDC devs, but I think this should be 
fine. ;)

We still need some way to actually tag the marked up declarations 
as such internally. Currently, we have Dsymbol::llvmInternal for 
this – god, that name is awful –, but of course it would be nice 
if you could find a nicely generic solution for that as well.

David