digitalmars.D - TIOBE Januar 2016 - D rose 2 positions
- Martin Tschierschke (8/8) Jan 08 2016 D rose again from 23th to 21th!
- JohnCK (5/13) Jan 08 2016 Old news... and there is already a topic about this:
- Martin Tschierschke (3/9) Jan 08 2016 Sorry, missed that.
- Guillaume Piolat (4/12) Jan 08 2016 TIOBE is not a fantastic source of data. It's only search engine
- Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d (16/20) Jan 08 2016 Or at least give it credit for what it is: search engine buzz.
- Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQ=?= (6/9) Jan 08 2016 I think the main problem is that the data collection appears to
- Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d (14/24) Jan 08 2016 On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 14:58 +0000, Ola Fosheim Gr=C3=B8stad via Digitalm...
- Ozan (6/10) Jan 09 2016 Tiobe's data is garbage? Already discussed? Only search engine
D rose again from 23th to 21th! http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html The rating is now more than 1% same as many other languages in the ~15+ range. Explore the history here: http://web.archive.org/web/20150101033933/http://www.tiobe.com/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html?lm:1417992224 Its an quite interesting. regards mt.
Jan 08 2016
On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 10:40:14 UTC, Martin Tschierschke wrote:D rose again from 23th to 21th! http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html The rating is now more than 1% same as many other languages in the ~15+ range. Explore the history here: http://web.archive.org/web/20150101033933/http://www.tiobe.com/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html?lm:1417992224 Its an quite interesting. regards mt.Old news... and there is already a topic about this: http://forum.dlang.org/post/orlolqpivjpddwyyhfre forum.dlang.org JohnCK.
Jan 08 2016
On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 13:22:07 UTC, JohnCK wrote:On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 10:40:14 UTC, Martin Tschierschke wrote:[...]D rose again from 23th to 21th!Old news... and there is already a topic about this: http://forum.dlang.org/post/orlolqpivjpddwyyhfre forum.dlang.org JohnCK.Sorry, missed that.
Jan 08 2016
On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 10:40:14 UTC, Martin Tschierschke wrote:D rose again from 23th to 21th! http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html The rating is now more than 1% same as many other languages in the ~15+ range. Explore the history here: http://web.archive.org/web/20150101033933/http://www.tiobe.com/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html?lm:1417992224 Its an quite interesting. regards mt.TIOBE is not a fantastic source of data. It's only search engine results. How about we stop giving it credit?
Jan 08 2016
On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 13:24 +0000, Guillaume Piolat via Digitalmars-d wrote:[=E2=80=A6] =20 TIOBE is not a fantastic source of data. It's only search engine=C2=A0 results. How about we stop giving it credit?Or at least give it credit for what it is: search engine buzz. Metrics like this can be fun, if taken in the right spirit. If you are not watching it then you cannot spot and speak out against people taking the wrong things from the metric. --=20 Russel. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.winder ekiga.n= et 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: russel winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
Jan 08 2016
On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 14:50:39 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:Metrics like this can be fun, if taken in the right spirit. If you are not watching it then you cannot spot and speak out against people taking the wrong things from the metric.I think the main problem is that the data collection appears to be fundamentally flawed. I wouldn't be surprised if it matches against "java d compiler" (weird misspelling of "java decompiler"?) and "3-D programming" etc. Seriously, how can one get absolute numbers for "D" and "Go"?
Jan 08 2016
On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 14:58 +0000, Ola Fosheim Gr=C3=B8stad via Digitalmars= - d wrote:On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 14:50:39 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:You can't. Hence dlang golang rustlang as an idiom. --=20 Russel. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.winder ekiga.n= et 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: russel winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winderMetrics like this can be fun, if taken in the right spirit. If=C2=A0 you are not watching it then you cannot spot and speak out=C2=A0 against people taking the wrong things from the metric.=20 I think the main problem is that the data collection appears to=C2=A0 be fundamentally flawed. I wouldn't be surprised if it matches=C2=A0 against "java d compiler" (weird misspelling of "java=C2=A0 decompiler"?) and "3-D programming" etc. Seriously, how can one=C2=A0 get absolute numbers for "D" and "Go"?
Jan 08 2016
On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 10:40:14 UTC, Martin Tschierschke wrote:D rose again from 23th to 21th! http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html The rating is now more than 1% same as many other languages in the ~15+ rangeTiobe's data is garbage? Already discussed? Only search engine stuff? Who cares? Looking forward to see D in the top twenty. Regards Ozan
Jan 09 2016