• Sean Eskapp (19/19) Jan 20 2011 In code like this:
• =?UTF-8?B?U8O2bmtlIEx1ZHdpZw==?= (2/21) Jan 20 2011 See http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3863.
• Trass3r (1/1) Jan 20 2011 Probably related to http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5460
• Sean Eskapp (1/1) Jan 20 2011 That looks like a similar issue. Thanks!

Sean Eskapp <eatingstaples gmail.com> writes:

In code like this:

import std.stdio;

struct foo
{
	int val;

	static immutable bar = foo(1);

	this(int val)
	{
		this.val = 50;
	}
}

void main()
{
	writeln(foo.bar.val);
}

The user-defined struct constructor is not called, because it's overridden by
a built-in constructor which treats it like an initializer list. Shouldn't
constructors in structs either generate errors/warnings, or work as they would
appear to?

=?UTF-8?B?U8O2bmtlIEx1ZHdpZw==?= <ludwig informatik.uni-luebeck.de> writes:

Am 20.01.2011 19:42, schrieb Sean Eskapp:
 In code like this:

 import std.stdio;

 struct foo
 {
 	int val;

 	static immutable bar = foo(1);

 	this(int val)
 	{
 		this.val = 50;
 	}
 }

 void main()
 {
 	writeln(foo.bar.val);
 }

 The user-defined struct constructor is not called, because it's overridden by
 a built-in constructor which treats it like an initializer list. Shouldn't
 constructors in structs either generate errors/warnings, or work as they would
 appear to?

See http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3863.

Trass3r <un known.com> writes:

Probably related to http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5460

Sean Eskapp <eatingstaples gmail.com> writes:

That looks like a similar issue. Thanks!