digitalmars.D - Strange bug: dmd crash
- Amaury Pouly (32/32) Dec 31 2006 Hi,
- Jarrett Billingsley (6/38) Dec 31 2006 First, try it with 0.178 and see if it goes away.
- pamaury (5/49) Dec 31 2006 Thanks for your answer but even with v0.178 it crashes.
Hi, I'm not sure it's the right place to say it but I found a strange configuration where dmd(on windows XP) crashes. Here is the code: [test.d] import test2; abstract class UpperClass { } [test2.d] import test; abstract class MiddleClass : UpperClass { } class Generic(T) : MiddleClass { T m_value=0; } alias Generic!(byte) GenericByte; If I compile with: dmd test.d test2.d Then it crashes. Some important facts about this "bug": -if everything is coded is one file, dmd compiles well -if I import test2 AFTER the declaration of UpperClass and NOT BEFORE, dmd compiles well -if I remove "alias Generic!(byte) GenericByte;", dmd compiles well -if I change "T m_value=0;" to "T m_value;", dmd compiles well -if MiddleClass does not inherite from UpperClass or Generic inherite from MiddleClass, dmd compiles well When I say it compiles well of course, I mean without crashing :) I'm using dmd v0.177
Dec 31 2006
"Amaury Pouly" <amaury.pouly gmail.com> wrote in message news:en9dts$1qf0$1 digitaldaemon.com...Hi, I'm not sure it's the right place to say it but I found a strange configuration where dmd(on windows XP) crashes. Here is the code: [test.d] import test2; abstract class UpperClass { } [test2.d] import test; abstract class MiddleClass : UpperClass { } class Generic(T) : MiddleClass { T m_value=0; } alias Generic!(byte) GenericByte; If I compile with: dmd test.d test2.d Then it crashes. Some important facts about this "bug": -if everything is coded is one file, dmd compiles well -if I import test2 AFTER the declaration of UpperClass and NOT BEFORE, dmd compiles well -if I remove "alias Generic!(byte) GenericByte;", dmd compiles well -if I change "T m_value=0;" to "T m_value;", dmd compiles well -if MiddleClass does not inherite from UpperClass or Generic inherite from MiddleClass, dmd compiles well When I say it compiles well of course, I mean without crashing :) I'm using dmd v0.177First, try it with 0.178 and see if it goes away. If that doesn't fix it, try posting this on Bugzilla: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/ You might also try searching it to see if the bug has already been posted.
Dec 31 2006
== Extrait de l'article de « Jarrett Billingsley (kb3ctd2 yahoo.com) »"Amaury Pouly" <amaury.pouly gmail.com> wrote in message news:en9dts$1qf0$1 digitaldaemon.com...Thanks for your answer but even with v0.178 it crashes. I've not found a similar issue on BugZilla but its quite difficult to describe easily this bug so I have perhaps missed it :( I will post it on BugZilla.Hi, I'm not sure it's the right place to say it but I found a strange configuration where dmd(on windows XP) crashes. Here is the code: [test.d] import test2; abstract class UpperClass { } [test2.d] import test; abstract class MiddleClass : UpperClass { } class Generic(T) : MiddleClass { T m_value=0; } alias Generic!(byte) GenericByte; If I compile with: dmd test.d test2.d Then it crashes. Some important facts about this "bug": -if everything is coded is one file, dmd compiles well -if I import test2 AFTER the declaration of UpperClass and NOT BEFORE, dmd compiles well -if I remove "alias Generic!(byte) GenericByte;", dmd compiles well -if I change "T m_value=0;" to "T m_value;", dmd compiles well -if MiddleClass does not inherite from UpperClass or Generic inherite from MiddleClass, dmd compiles well When I say it compiles well of course, I mean without crashing :) I'm using dmd v0.177First, try it with 0.178 and see if it goes away. If that doesn't fix it, try posting this on Bugzilla: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/ You might also try searching it to see if the bug has already been posted.
Dec 31 2006