digitalmars.D - Standard Input/Output
- BB (2/2) Aug 10 2014 A general question, Why std.stdio could not be something like
- Era Scarecrow (5/7) Aug 10 2014 From a historical point, C and C++ name their library stdio.h.
- H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d (8/16) Aug 10 2014 std.io is supposed to be in the works, and is slated to replace
A general question, Why std.stdio could not be something like ---> std.io?
Aug 10 2014
On Monday, 11 August 2014 at 04:28:53 UTC, BB wrote:A general question, Why std.stdio could not be something like ---> std.io?From a historical point, C and C++ name their library stdio.h. io by itself is just input/output, and doesn't really hint it would be using the STDIN/STDOUT. Beyond historical, i couldn't tell you why not to...
Aug 10 2014
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 04:34:52AM +0000, Era Scarecrow via Digitalmars-d wrote:On Monday, 11 August 2014 at 04:28:53 UTC, BB wrote:Because std.stdio is just a wrapper around C's stdio library.A general question, Why std.stdio could not be something like ---> std.io?From a historical point, C and C++ name their library stdio.h. io by itself is just input/output, and doesn't really hint it would be using the STDIN/STDOUT. Beyond historical, i couldn't tell you why not to...std.io is supposed to be in the works, and is slated to replace std.stream and be a superior to std.stdio. Unfortunately, std.io has yet to materialize, 'cos the guy working on it has been rather busy. :-( T -- People say I'm arrogant, and I'm proud of it.
Aug 10 2014