digitalmars.D - Some things from GCC 5
- bearophile (46/53) Nov 30 2014 Some interesting changes in GCC 5.0:
- bearophile (6/21) Nov 30 2014 I have added this to Bugzilla, it can please the "final on
- Meta (5/11) Nov 30 2014 It seems that both of these could be added as a rule for DScanner
Some interesting changes in GCC 5.0: https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/changes.html ----------------- A new command-line option -Wlogical-not-parentheses has been added for the C and C++ compilers, which warns about "logical not" used on the left hand side operand of a comparison. bool not_equal(int x, int y) { return !x == y; // warn here } return !(x == y); // first fix-it, to negate comparison. return (!x) == y; // second fix-it, to silence warning. Its usefulness:Close to 100% true positive. That is hundreds of bugs found in millions of lines of code. For most cases, evaluating the comparison first was the correct change. For some others, the '!' was a typo and removed. A few cases involved macros.If it's close to 100% positive then perhaps it's worth turning it into an error in D. ----------------- There are now intrinsic functions to perform arithmetics with overflow guards, __builtin_add_overflow, __builtin_sub_overflow and __builtin_mul_overflow: void * calloc (size_t x, size_t y) { size_t sz; if (__builtin_mul_overflow (x, y, &sz)) return NULL; void *ret = malloc (sz); if (ret) memset (res, 0, sz); return ret; } They are the same in GCC and LLVM-Clang, so is it worth changing the API of core.checkedint to make is the same of those functions, for efficiency and GDC/LDC implementation simplicity? ----------------- New warnings -Wsuggest-final-types and -Wsuggest-final-methods helps developers to annotate programs by final specifiers (or anonymous namespaces) in the cases where code generation improves. These warnings can be used at compile time, but they are more useful in combination with link-time optimization. Some info: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg00119.html For D this can become a "tip" from the compiler. ----------------- C++ Dynamic Arrays, I miss them in D: http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/sc22/WG21/docs/papers/2013/n3662.html ----------------- Bye, bearophile
Nov 30 2014
A new command-line option -Wlogical-not-parentheses has been added for the C and C++ compilers, which warns about "logical not" used on the left hand side operand of a comparison. bool not_equal(int x, int y) { return !x == y; // warn here } return !(x == y); // first fix-it, to negate comparison. return (!x) == y; // second fix-it, to silence warning.I'll wait for your opinions before asking for this error in D.New warnings -Wsuggest-final-types and -Wsuggest-final-methods helps developers to annotate programs by final specifiers (or anonymous namespaces) in the cases where code generation improves. These warnings can be used at compile time, but they are more useful in combination with link-time optimization. Some info: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg00119.htmlI have added this to Bugzilla, it can please the "final on default" crowd: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13798 Bye, bearophile
Nov 30 2014
On Sunday, 30 November 2014 at 10:58:01 UTC, bearophile wrote:I'll wait for your opinions before asking for this error in D. I have added this to Bugzilla, it can please the "final on default" crowd: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13798 Bye, bearophileIt seems that both of these could be added as a rule for DScanner (maybe not the latter, I don't know). It's not ideal, but anyone that cares enough to want these to be warnings or errors is using DScanner anyway.
Nov 30 2014