• bearophile (5/5) Apr 11 2011 Simple slides about Nemerle language, derived from C#, so far I have nev...
• Piotr Szturmaj (3/8) Apr 11 2011 C# has yield since version 2.0:
• VladD2 (2/2) Apr 12 2011 This is a yield in method. Nemerle support it too. But Nemerle support
• spir (8/11) Apr 11 2011 Looks like a nice language, indeed... and strangely similar to Ocaml (bo...
• Nick Sabalausky (8/16) Apr 11 2011 Yea. I've still never used Nemerle (never liked the idea of being
• VladD2 (3/5) Apr 14 2011 It is better to learn a language by reading articles about it, but not l...

bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> writes:

Nemerle:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/gnaop/nemerle_vs_c/

The things I like more are yield (page 20 and 44 of the PDF), some tuple syntax
(page 51), pattern matching and algebraic types (especially page 64 and 65).
(Macros too may be cool, but they are another level of complexity). It seems it
uses a simple syntax for tuples, and the pattern matching syntax too looks
simple.

Bye,
bearophile

Piotr Szturmaj <bncrbme jadamspam.pl> writes:

bearophile wrote:

used Nemerle:
 http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/gnaop/nemerle_vs_c/

 The things I like more are yield (page 20 and 44 of the PDF), some tuple
syntax (page 51), pattern matching and algebraic types (especially page 64 and
65). (Macros too may be cool, but they are another level of complexity). It
seems it uses a simple syntax for tuples, and the pattern matching syntax too
looks simple.

 Bye,
 bearophile



http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/UploadFile/rmcochran/yieldreturn04022006113850AM/yieldreturn.aspx

VladD2 <vc rsdn.ru> writes:

This is a yield in method. Nemerle support it too. But Nemerle support
yield inside separate expression.

spir <denis.spir gmail.com> writes:

On 04/11/2011 02:05 PM, bearophile wrote:

used Nemerle:
 http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/gnaop/nemerle_vs_c/

 The things I like more are yield (page 20 and 44 of the PDF), some tuple
syntax (page 51), pattern matching and algebraic types (especially page 64 and
65). (Macros too may be cool, but they are another level of complexity). It
seems it uses a simple syntax for tuples, and the pattern matching syntax too
looks simple.

Looks like a nice language, indeed... and strangely similar to Ocaml (born 1996 
IIRC) ;-)

Denis
-- 
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com

"Nick Sabalausky" <a a.a> writes:

"bearophile" <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> wrote in message 
news:inuqqs$niq$1 digitalmars.com...

 used Nemerle:
 http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/gnaop/nemerle_vs_c/

 The things I like more are yield (page 20 and 44 of the PDF), some tuple 
 syntax (page 51), pattern matching and algebraic types (especially page 64 
 and 65). (Macros too may be cool, but they are another level of 
 complexity). It seems it uses a simple syntax for tuples, and the pattern 
 matching syntax too looks simple.

Yea. I've still never used Nemerle (never liked the idea of being 
constrained to a VM), but ever since I came across it I've been a huge fan 
of it's patten matching and, to a slightly lesser extent, it's macros too. 
So much so, in fact, that it's been really tempting to try using it for a 
few things instead of D despite the VM ball-and-chain. Seeing Nemerle's 
pattern matching added to D would make me an incredibly happy D user.

VladD2 <vc rsdn.ru> writes:

bearophile Wrote:


used Nemerle:
 http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/gnaop/nemerle_vs_c/

It is better to learn a language by reading articles about it, but not looking
to slides. Here is a simple introduction to the language:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/140tNKZrj8vgp7uGgK1tb7sVM_G45ZHTBf8McOLppy-k/edit?hl=en&authkey=CIiBucIC#