• bearophile (3/3) Sep 15 2010 Is it possible to modify D error messages so when the precondition of a ...
• bearophile (3/3) Sep 16 2010 Once there's a good stack trace, there is no need of this. So please ign...
• Sean Kelly (2/3) Sep 16 2010 There should be a good stack trace on Linux and OSX now. If Linux is st...

bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> writes:

Is it possible to modify D error messages so when the precondition of a
function fails, dmd shows a (more useful) error at the calling point instead of
giving an assert error at the assert line number inside the precondition? Maybe
this is possible once dmd is able to generate the stack trace on Windows too.

Bye,
bearophile

bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> writes:

Once there's a good stack trace, there is no need of this. So please ignore
this (I was sleepy).

Bye and sorry,
bearophile

Sean Kelly <sean invisibleduck.org> writes:

bearophile Wrote:

 Is it possible to modify D error messages so when the precondition of a
function fails, dmd shows a (more useful) error at the calling point instead of
giving an assert error at the assert line number inside the precondition? Maybe
this is possible once dmd is able to generate the stack trace on Windows too.

There should be a good stack trace on Linux and OSX now.  If Linux is still an
issue then -L--export-dynamic wasn't added to dmd.conf.  I haven't checked
2.049 yet.